伊朗专家对认知障碍多发性硬化症患者治疗升级的方法

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fereshteh Ghadiri, Elnaz Asadollahzadeh, Zahra Ebadi, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Amirreza Azimi, Samira Navardi, Hora Heidari, Zohreh Abna, Marzieh Aboutorabi, Iman Adibi, Seyed Mohammad Baghbanian, Sepideh Paybast, Maryam Poursadeghfard, Samaneh Hosseini, Sareh Shahmohammadi, Mehran Ghaffari, Hamidreza Ghalyanchi-Langroodi, Masoud Ghiasian, Hoda Kamali, Ebrahim Kouchaki, Farzad Mahrabi, Ehsan Mohammadianinejad, Mohammad Ali Nahayati, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi
{"title":"伊朗专家对认知障碍多发性硬化症患者治疗升级的方法","authors":"Fereshteh Ghadiri, Elnaz Asadollahzadeh, Zahra Ebadi, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Amirreza Azimi, Samira Navardi, Hora Heidari, Zohreh Abna, Marzieh Aboutorabi, Iman Adibi, Seyed Mohammad Baghbanian, Sepideh Paybast, Maryam Poursadeghfard, Samaneh Hosseini, Sareh Shahmohammadi, Mehran Ghaffari, Hamidreza Ghalyanchi-Langroodi, Masoud Ghiasian, Hoda Kamali, Ebrahim Kouchaki, Farzad Mahrabi, Ehsan Mohammadianinejad, Mohammad Ali Nahayati, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v22i1.12610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> People with multiple sclerosis ‎(MS) and their physicians recognize cognitive retention as an important desired outcome of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In this study, we attempted to gather the opinions of Iranian MS experts regarding the treatment approach toward clinical cases with different physical and cognitive conditions. <b>Methods:</b> Opinions of 20 MS specialists regarding the best approach to 6 case scenarios (with different clinical, cognitive, and imaging characteristics) were gathered via a form. <b>Results:</b> The estimated kappa of 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.159-0.163; P < 0.001] suggested a poor degree of agreement on the treatment choice among the professionals. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although most specialists agreed with treatment escalation in cases with cognitive impairment, there was no general agreement. Furthermore, there was not enough clinical evidence in the literature to develop consensus guidelines on the matter.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iranian specialists' approach to treatment escalation in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Fereshteh Ghadiri, Elnaz Asadollahzadeh, Zahra Ebadi, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Amirreza Azimi, Samira Navardi, Hora Heidari, Zohreh Abna, Marzieh Aboutorabi, Iman Adibi, Seyed Mohammad Baghbanian, Sepideh Paybast, Maryam Poursadeghfard, Samaneh Hosseini, Sareh Shahmohammadi, Mehran Ghaffari, Hamidreza Ghalyanchi-Langroodi, Masoud Ghiasian, Hoda Kamali, Ebrahim Kouchaki, Farzad Mahrabi, Ehsan Mohammadianinejad, Mohammad Ali Nahayati, Abdorreza Naser Moghadasi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/cjn.v22i1.12610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> People with multiple sclerosis ‎(MS) and their physicians recognize cognitive retention as an important desired outcome of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In this study, we attempted to gather the opinions of Iranian MS experts regarding the treatment approach toward clinical cases with different physical and cognitive conditions. <b>Methods:</b> Opinions of 20 MS specialists regarding the best approach to 6 case scenarios (with different clinical, cognitive, and imaging characteristics) were gathered via a form. <b>Results:</b> The estimated kappa of 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.159-0.163; P < 0.001] suggested a poor degree of agreement on the treatment choice among the professionals. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although most specialists agreed with treatment escalation in cases with cognitive impairment, there was no general agreement. Furthermore, there was not enough clinical evidence in the literature to develop consensus guidelines on the matter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444593/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v22i1.12610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v22i1.12610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多发性硬化症患者‎(MS)及其医生认识到认知保留是疾病改良疗法(DMTs)的一个重要预期结果。在这项研究中,我们试图收集伊朗MS专家对不同身体和认知状况的临床病例的治疗方法的意见。方法:通过表格收集20名MS专家对6种情况(具有不同的临床、认知和影像学特征)的最佳治疗方法的意见。结论:尽管大多数专家都同意认知障碍患者的治疗升级,但没有达成一致。此外,文献中没有足够的临床证据来制定关于这一问题的共识指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iranian specialists' approach to treatment escalation in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive impairment.

Background: People with multiple sclerosis ‎(MS) and their physicians recognize cognitive retention as an important desired outcome of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In this study, we attempted to gather the opinions of Iranian MS experts regarding the treatment approach toward clinical cases with different physical and cognitive conditions. Methods: Opinions of 20 MS specialists regarding the best approach to 6 case scenarios (with different clinical, cognitive, and imaging characteristics) were gathered via a form. Results: The estimated kappa of 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.159-0.163; P < 0.001] suggested a poor degree of agreement on the treatment choice among the professionals. Conclusion: Although most specialists agreed with treatment escalation in cases with cognitive impairment, there was no general agreement. Furthermore, there was not enough clinical evidence in the literature to develop consensus guidelines on the matter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信