{"title":"致编辑的信:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉研究,评估帖莫洛尔眼液作为偏头痛急性治疗的疗效和安全性","authors":"J. Hagan","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol1315733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am an experienced and published researcher using timolol betablocker ophthalmic eyedrops for the successful treatment of acute migraines.1-5 The above referenced paper contains many errors in study design and conduct.6 The statistics, discussion, and conclusion are misleading. Beta blockers are FDA approved and often effective for chronic migraine prevention by taking daily oral doses that maintain therapeutic blood levels. For acute migraine, oral beta blockers have not worked well because they take too long to achieve therapeutic blood levels.1,2 There are three other ways beta blocker solutions can be used to quickly achieve therapeutic blood levels. The first is promptly and properly applied topical beta blocker eyedrops to normal eyes/eyelids/nasolacrimal ducts/nasal mucosa. Faster is sublingual beta blocker drops and the fastest is beta blocker nasal spray.1,2 These last two preferred methods were not discussed in Aggarwal’s paper.6 Ophthalmologists spend their careers listening to patients complain about the difficulties of using eye drops. Sublingual application has been studied and found effective for glaucoma control in a subgroup of dropchallenged patients.7 Most acute migraine patients I have treated with timolol 0.5% eye drops prefer to take them sublingual for ease of application and efficacy rather than topical to the eyes. Absorption of beta blockers and subsequent beta receptor blockade has been studied.1,8 Of these three methods, nasal application has been shown to the be fastest and equivalent to intravenous beta blocker administration in a study of 80 human volunteers.8 Until recently, no beta blocker nasal spray was commercially available. O’Brien Pharmacy (https://obrienrx.com/) now prepares a compounded nasal spray of timolol with MucoluxTM delivering 0.125 mg/0.1 ml spray. The nasal spray is shaken and one spray delivered into each nostril at first onset of migraine symptoms. Patients may also take their other acute migraine medications with the beta blocker nasal spray. If migraine headache persists a second set of one spray per nostril is repeated in 10-15 minutes. A maximum of 4 sprays per 24 hours is specified. An O’Brien pharmacist contacts the patient on receiving a prescription from a licensed physician and inquires about beta blocker contra-indication and instructs on use. The cost of the medication at this writing is $30 for a 10 ml bottle plus postage. All future research on using beta blockers for acute migraine should be done using nasal delivery. I have no financial interest in this product. The Aggarwal study6 has so many other deficiencies that for reasons of space I can only list them without much discussion: patients not beta blocker naïve were included; retrospective exclusion of them taints the already scant data; the patients were not instructed to take the eye drops as quickly as possible with migraine onset; instead they had to fill out a questionnaire about the migraine; the study does not state if or when a second set of eye drops were to be instilled (ideally 10 minutes after the first if migraine persists); it is not stated whether patients were allowed to take their usual acute migraine medications which they should have been; the migraine patients were recruited from a tertiary neurological referral center with a high number of refractory migraineurs. Most important, per their own analysis, the number of patients studied does not allow any reliable statistical validity which Aggarwal nevertheless erroneously claimed. Their discussion does not include consideration of the more effective and easier to use sublingual or nasal beta blocker administration; the discussion attributes findings and conclusions to another study9 that are inaccurate and ignores optimistic statements of those authors about further study of beta blockers for acute migraine.10 Cossack et al.9 reported that 4 of their 10 studied patients found the masked beta blocker eye drop a useful addition to their acute migraine therapy versus only 1 in favor of masked placebo. They did allow a second set of eye drops but no sooner than 30 minutes because of Institutional Review Board concerns. They did discuss that if used 10-15 minutes post first insertion it might have improved their results. They did not claim statistical significance of their study but determined that “A future crossover study will require 86 patients to power a study with α≤0.05 and β≤0.2.”9,10 Cossack and Gratton conclude their discussion, “We believe that, together, our work advances the notion that timolol drops are a safe effective, and already widely available abortive treatment in select migraineurs.”10 Neither the Cossack et al.9 or the Aggarwal studies were large enough for statistical significance so it is a misrepresentation for Aggarwal et al.6 to state “we now have two randomized-controlled trials that would not demonstrate a marked effect of the drug compared to placebo.” I hope that either the pharmaceutical industry or grant funding will soon conduct a large, adequately-powered (N ≥ 86), placebo-controlled, cross-over study using the newly available nasal spray delivery as a novel, safe, relatively inexpensive treatment for acute migraines.","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter to the Editor: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Ophthalmic Solution as an Acute Treatment of Migraine\",\"authors\":\"J. Hagan\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/kjm.vol1315733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am an experienced and published researcher using timolol betablocker ophthalmic eyedrops for the successful treatment of acute migraines.1-5 The above referenced paper contains many errors in study design and conduct.6 The statistics, discussion, and conclusion are misleading. Beta blockers are FDA approved and often effective for chronic migraine prevention by taking daily oral doses that maintain therapeutic blood levels. For acute migraine, oral beta blockers have not worked well because they take too long to achieve therapeutic blood levels.1,2 There are three other ways beta blocker solutions can be used to quickly achieve therapeutic blood levels. The first is promptly and properly applied topical beta blocker eyedrops to normal eyes/eyelids/nasolacrimal ducts/nasal mucosa. Faster is sublingual beta blocker drops and the fastest is beta blocker nasal spray.1,2 These last two preferred methods were not discussed in Aggarwal’s paper.6 Ophthalmologists spend their careers listening to patients complain about the difficulties of using eye drops. Sublingual application has been studied and found effective for glaucoma control in a subgroup of dropchallenged patients.7 Most acute migraine patients I have treated with timolol 0.5% eye drops prefer to take them sublingual for ease of application and efficacy rather than topical to the eyes. Absorption of beta blockers and subsequent beta receptor blockade has been studied.1,8 Of these three methods, nasal application has been shown to the be fastest and equivalent to intravenous beta blocker administration in a study of 80 human volunteers.8 Until recently, no beta blocker nasal spray was commercially available. O’Brien Pharmacy (https://obrienrx.com/) now prepares a compounded nasal spray of timolol with MucoluxTM delivering 0.125 mg/0.1 ml spray. The nasal spray is shaken and one spray delivered into each nostril at first onset of migraine symptoms. Patients may also take their other acute migraine medications with the beta blocker nasal spray. If migraine headache persists a second set of one spray per nostril is repeated in 10-15 minutes. A maximum of 4 sprays per 24 hours is specified. An O’Brien pharmacist contacts the patient on receiving a prescription from a licensed physician and inquires about beta blocker contra-indication and instructs on use. The cost of the medication at this writing is $30 for a 10 ml bottle plus postage. All future research on using beta blockers for acute migraine should be done using nasal delivery. I have no financial interest in this product. The Aggarwal study6 has so many other deficiencies that for reasons of space I can only list them without much discussion: patients not beta blocker naïve were included; retrospective exclusion of them taints the already scant data; the patients were not instructed to take the eye drops as quickly as possible with migraine onset; instead they had to fill out a questionnaire about the migraine; the study does not state if or when a second set of eye drops were to be instilled (ideally 10 minutes after the first if migraine persists); it is not stated whether patients were allowed to take their usual acute migraine medications which they should have been; the migraine patients were recruited from a tertiary neurological referral center with a high number of refractory migraineurs. Most important, per their own analysis, the number of patients studied does not allow any reliable statistical validity which Aggarwal nevertheless erroneously claimed. Their discussion does not include consideration of the more effective and easier to use sublingual or nasal beta blocker administration; the discussion attributes findings and conclusions to another study9 that are inaccurate and ignores optimistic statements of those authors about further study of beta blockers for acute migraine.10 Cossack et al.9 reported that 4 of their 10 studied patients found the masked beta blocker eye drop a useful addition to their acute migraine therapy versus only 1 in favor of masked placebo. They did allow a second set of eye drops but no sooner than 30 minutes because of Institutional Review Board concerns. They did discuss that if used 10-15 minutes post first insertion it might have improved their results. They did not claim statistical significance of their study but determined that “A future crossover study will require 86 patients to power a study with α≤0.05 and β≤0.2.”9,10 Cossack and Gratton conclude their discussion, “We believe that, together, our work advances the notion that timolol drops are a safe effective, and already widely available abortive treatment in select migraineurs.”10 Neither the Cossack et al.9 or the Aggarwal studies were large enough for statistical significance so it is a misrepresentation for Aggarwal et al.6 to state “we now have two randomized-controlled trials that would not demonstrate a marked effect of the drug compared to placebo.” I hope that either the pharmaceutical industry or grant funding will soon conduct a large, adequately-powered (N ≥ 86), placebo-controlled, cross-over study using the newly available nasal spray delivery as a novel, safe, relatively inexpensive treatment for acute migraines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kansas journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kansas journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol1315733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol1315733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我是一名经验丰富的研究人员,并发表了使用噻莫洛尔β受体阻滞剂眼药水成功治疗急性偏头痛的研究成果。上述引用的论文在研究设计和实施上存在许多错误统计数据、讨论和结论都具有误导性。-受体阻滞剂是美国食品和药物管理局批准的,通过每日口服剂量来维持治疗性血液水平,通常对慢性偏头痛预防有效。对于急性偏头痛,口服受体阻滞剂效果不佳,因为它们需要太长时间才能达到治疗性的血液水平。还有其他三种方法可以使用-受体阻滞剂溶液来快速达到治疗血液水平。首先是及时和适当地将-受体阻滞剂滴眼液涂抹在正常的眼睛/眼睑/鼻泪管/鼻黏膜上。更快的是舌下阻滞剂滴药最快的是阻滞剂鼻喷剂。Aggarwal的论文中没有讨论后两种首选方法眼科医生的整个职业生涯都在倾听病人抱怨使用眼药水的困难。舌下应用已被研究,并发现有效的青光眼控制在一个亚组的drop挑战患者我用0.5%噻莫洛尔滴眼液治疗过的大多数急性偏头痛患者都喜欢舌下服用,因为这样更容易使用,效果也更好,而不是局部使用。β受体阻滞剂的吸收和随后的β受体阻断已被研究。在这三种方法中,经80名志愿者参与的一项研究表明,鼻腔给药是最快的,与静脉注射受体阻滞剂相当直到最近,市面上还没有β受体阻滞剂鼻腔喷雾剂。O 'Brien Pharmacy (https://obrienrx.com/)现在准备了一种含有MucoluxTM的噻莫洛尔复合鼻喷雾剂,剂量为0.125毫克/0.1毫升。在偏头痛症状首次发作时,摇匀鼻喷雾剂,每个鼻孔各喷一剂。患者也可以将其他急性偏头痛药物与受体阻滞剂鼻喷雾剂一起服用。如果偏头痛持续存在,在10-15分钟内重复每鼻孔一次喷雾的第二组。规定每24小时最多喷4次。O 'Brien药剂师在收到执业医师的处方后与患者联系,询问受体阻滞剂的禁忌症并指导使用。在撰写本文时,这种药物的成本是每瓶10毫升外加邮费30美元。未来所有关于使用-受体阻滞剂治疗急性偏头痛的研究都应该使用鼻腔给药。我对这个产品没有经济利益。阿加沃尔的研究还有很多其他不足之处,由于篇幅有限,我只能一一列举,不作过多讨论:没有使用-受体阻滞剂naïve的患者被包括在内;回顾性地排除它们会污染本已不足的数据;没有指示患者在偏头痛发作时尽快服用眼药水;相反,他们必须填写一份关于偏头痛的调查问卷;该研究并没有说明是否或何时需要注射第二组眼药水(如果偏头痛持续,最好是在第一次滴眼药水后10分钟);没有说明患者是否被允许服用他们通常应该服用的急性偏头痛药物;偏头痛患者是从一个三级神经转诊中心招募的,该中心有大量难治性偏头痛患者。最重要的是,根据他们自己的分析,所研究的患者数量不允许任何可靠的统计有效性,而Aggarwal却错误地声称。他们的讨论不包括考虑更有效和更容易使用舌下或鼻腔阻滞剂给药;讨论将发现和结论归因于另一项不准确的研究,并且忽略了那些作者关于进一步研究治疗急性偏头痛的-受体阻滞剂的乐观陈述Cossack et al.9报道,在他们研究的10名患者中,有4名患者发现蒙面β受体阻滞剂滴眼液是急性偏头痛治疗的有效补充,而只有1名患者赞成蒙面安慰剂。他们确实允许使用第二组眼药水,但由于机构审查委员会的考虑,时间不超过30分钟。他们确实讨论过,如果在第一次插入后使用10-15分钟,可能会改善他们的结果。他们没有声称他们的研究具有统计学意义,但确定“未来的交叉研究将需要86名患者来支持α≤0.05和β≤0.2的研究。”9,10哥萨克和格拉顿总结了他们的讨论,“我们相信,我们的工作共同推进了噻莫洛尔滴剂是一种安全有效的概念,并且已经广泛用于某些偏头痛患者的流产治疗。”10哥萨克等人9和阿加瓦尔等人的研究都没有足够大的统计意义,所以阿加瓦尔等人说“我们现在有两个随机对照试验,与安慰剂相比,不会证明药物有明显的效果”是错误的。 “我希望制药行业或资助机构能够尽快开展一项大型的、足够有力的(N≥86)、安慰剂对照的交叉研究,使用最新的鼻喷雾剂作为一种新的、安全的、相对便宜的急性偏头痛治疗方法。
Letter to the Editor: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Ophthalmic Solution as an Acute Treatment of Migraine
I am an experienced and published researcher using timolol betablocker ophthalmic eyedrops for the successful treatment of acute migraines.1-5 The above referenced paper contains many errors in study design and conduct.6 The statistics, discussion, and conclusion are misleading. Beta blockers are FDA approved and often effective for chronic migraine prevention by taking daily oral doses that maintain therapeutic blood levels. For acute migraine, oral beta blockers have not worked well because they take too long to achieve therapeutic blood levels.1,2 There are three other ways beta blocker solutions can be used to quickly achieve therapeutic blood levels. The first is promptly and properly applied topical beta blocker eyedrops to normal eyes/eyelids/nasolacrimal ducts/nasal mucosa. Faster is sublingual beta blocker drops and the fastest is beta blocker nasal spray.1,2 These last two preferred methods were not discussed in Aggarwal’s paper.6 Ophthalmologists spend their careers listening to patients complain about the difficulties of using eye drops. Sublingual application has been studied and found effective for glaucoma control in a subgroup of dropchallenged patients.7 Most acute migraine patients I have treated with timolol 0.5% eye drops prefer to take them sublingual for ease of application and efficacy rather than topical to the eyes. Absorption of beta blockers and subsequent beta receptor blockade has been studied.1,8 Of these three methods, nasal application has been shown to the be fastest and equivalent to intravenous beta blocker administration in a study of 80 human volunteers.8 Until recently, no beta blocker nasal spray was commercially available. O’Brien Pharmacy (https://obrienrx.com/) now prepares a compounded nasal spray of timolol with MucoluxTM delivering 0.125 mg/0.1 ml spray. The nasal spray is shaken and one spray delivered into each nostril at first onset of migraine symptoms. Patients may also take their other acute migraine medications with the beta blocker nasal spray. If migraine headache persists a second set of one spray per nostril is repeated in 10-15 minutes. A maximum of 4 sprays per 24 hours is specified. An O’Brien pharmacist contacts the patient on receiving a prescription from a licensed physician and inquires about beta blocker contra-indication and instructs on use. The cost of the medication at this writing is $30 for a 10 ml bottle plus postage. All future research on using beta blockers for acute migraine should be done using nasal delivery. I have no financial interest in this product. The Aggarwal study6 has so many other deficiencies that for reasons of space I can only list them without much discussion: patients not beta blocker naïve were included; retrospective exclusion of them taints the already scant data; the patients were not instructed to take the eye drops as quickly as possible with migraine onset; instead they had to fill out a questionnaire about the migraine; the study does not state if or when a second set of eye drops were to be instilled (ideally 10 minutes after the first if migraine persists); it is not stated whether patients were allowed to take their usual acute migraine medications which they should have been; the migraine patients were recruited from a tertiary neurological referral center with a high number of refractory migraineurs. Most important, per their own analysis, the number of patients studied does not allow any reliable statistical validity which Aggarwal nevertheless erroneously claimed. Their discussion does not include consideration of the more effective and easier to use sublingual or nasal beta blocker administration; the discussion attributes findings and conclusions to another study9 that are inaccurate and ignores optimistic statements of those authors about further study of beta blockers for acute migraine.10 Cossack et al.9 reported that 4 of their 10 studied patients found the masked beta blocker eye drop a useful addition to their acute migraine therapy versus only 1 in favor of masked placebo. They did allow a second set of eye drops but no sooner than 30 minutes because of Institutional Review Board concerns. They did discuss that if used 10-15 minutes post first insertion it might have improved their results. They did not claim statistical significance of their study but determined that “A future crossover study will require 86 patients to power a study with α≤0.05 and β≤0.2.”9,10 Cossack and Gratton conclude their discussion, “We believe that, together, our work advances the notion that timolol drops are a safe effective, and already widely available abortive treatment in select migraineurs.”10 Neither the Cossack et al.9 or the Aggarwal studies were large enough for statistical significance so it is a misrepresentation for Aggarwal et al.6 to state “we now have two randomized-controlled trials that would not demonstrate a marked effect of the drug compared to placebo.” I hope that either the pharmaceutical industry or grant funding will soon conduct a large, adequately-powered (N ≥ 86), placebo-controlled, cross-over study using the newly available nasal spray delivery as a novel, safe, relatively inexpensive treatment for acute migraines.