桑格拉总医院创伤与急症外科颌面部创伤病例骨折部位类型及处理

I. K. Wiargitha, A. A. A. Wiradana
{"title":"桑格拉总医院创伤与急症外科颌面部创伤病例骨折部位类型及处理","authors":"I. K. Wiargitha, A. A. A. Wiradana","doi":"10.24843/jbn.2019.v03.i02.p05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To know the patterns of fracture site and management of maxillofacial cases in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital Denpasar Bali. Methods: this is a retrospective study, based on medical record were concluded, samples taken in Sanglah General Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018. All of maxillofacial trauma medical records were taken. The data of age, gender, patterns of fractures site and management were taken and described. Results: There were total of 257 cases of maxillofacial trauma managed in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital. Two-hundred and forty-one medical records of maxillofacial trauma were included in this study. About 16 medical records were excluded due to incomplete medical records and could not be contacted. Mostly cases found in male, aged 18-40 years old. The site of fractures majorly located in the mandible (60.12%). About 48% fractures were identified at symphysis or parasymphysis of mandible, followed by the body and angular of mandible. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were the gold standard of the treatment (83,73%) followed by Archbarr (16,27%). Conclusion: The most common site of maxillofacial fracture was mandible, specifically at symphysis or parasymphysis part. ORIF miniplate, together with Archbarr and interdental wiring fixation were the most common modality of management.","PeriodicalId":52988,"journal":{"name":"JBN Jurnal Bedah Nasional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.24843/jbn.2019.v03.i02.p05","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Fracture Site and Management of Maxillofacial Trauma Cases in The Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital\",\"authors\":\"I. K. Wiargitha, A. A. A. Wiradana\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/jbn.2019.v03.i02.p05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To know the patterns of fracture site and management of maxillofacial cases in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital Denpasar Bali. Methods: this is a retrospective study, based on medical record were concluded, samples taken in Sanglah General Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018. All of maxillofacial trauma medical records were taken. The data of age, gender, patterns of fractures site and management were taken and described. Results: There were total of 257 cases of maxillofacial trauma managed in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital. Two-hundred and forty-one medical records of maxillofacial trauma were included in this study. About 16 medical records were excluded due to incomplete medical records and could not be contacted. Mostly cases found in male, aged 18-40 years old. The site of fractures majorly located in the mandible (60.12%). About 48% fractures were identified at symphysis or parasymphysis of mandible, followed by the body and angular of mandible. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were the gold standard of the treatment (83,73%) followed by Archbarr (16,27%). Conclusion: The most common site of maxillofacial fracture was mandible, specifically at symphysis or parasymphysis part. ORIF miniplate, together with Archbarr and interdental wiring fixation were the most common modality of management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBN Jurnal Bedah Nasional\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.24843/jbn.2019.v03.i02.p05\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBN Jurnal Bedah Nasional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/jbn.2019.v03.i02.p05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBN Jurnal Bedah Nasional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/jbn.2019.v03.i02.p05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:了解巴厘岛登巴萨桑拉综合医院创伤和急性护理外科颌面部病例的骨折部位类型和处理方法。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,根据医疗记录得出结论,于2012年1月至2018年12月在桑拉综合医院采集样本。所有颌面部创伤的医疗记录都被记录下来。采集并描述了年龄、性别、骨折部位和治疗方式的数据。结果:桑拉综合医院创伤与急诊外科共治疗颌面部创伤257例。本研究纳入了241份颌面部创伤的医疗记录。由于医疗记录不完整,约有16份医疗记录被排除在外,无法联系。病例多为男性,年龄18-40岁。骨折部位主要位于下颌骨(60.12%),约48%的骨折位于下颌骨联合或副联合,其次为下颌骨体部和角部。开放复位内固定(ORIF)是治疗的金标准(83,73%),其次是Archbarr(16,27%)。结论:颌面部骨折最常见的部位是下颌骨,尤其是联合部或副联合部。ORIF微型接骨板、Archbarr和齿间布线固定是最常见的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Fracture Site and Management of Maxillofacial Trauma Cases in The Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital
Aim: To know the patterns of fracture site and management of maxillofacial cases in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital Denpasar Bali. Methods: this is a retrospective study, based on medical record were concluded, samples taken in Sanglah General Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018. All of maxillofacial trauma medical records were taken. The data of age, gender, patterns of fractures site and management were taken and described. Results: There were total of 257 cases of maxillofacial trauma managed in the Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery in Sanglah General Hospital. Two-hundred and forty-one medical records of maxillofacial trauma were included in this study. About 16 medical records were excluded due to incomplete medical records and could not be contacted. Mostly cases found in male, aged 18-40 years old. The site of fractures majorly located in the mandible (60.12%). About 48% fractures were identified at symphysis or parasymphysis of mandible, followed by the body and angular of mandible. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were the gold standard of the treatment (83,73%) followed by Archbarr (16,27%). Conclusion: The most common site of maxillofacial fracture was mandible, specifically at symphysis or parasymphysis part. ORIF miniplate, together with Archbarr and interdental wiring fixation were the most common modality of management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信