当政府做对了:战略愿景过程如何使嵌套的政府系统保持一致,以支持地方相关性和决心

M. Marczak, Jessica Rochester, T. Bailey, Jolene Gansen, Amber Zapata, Lucas Kosobuski, Carrie Lindquist, Patricia D. Olson
{"title":"当政府做对了:战略愿景过程如何使嵌套的政府系统保持一致,以支持地方相关性和决心","authors":"M. Marczak, Jessica Rochester, T. Bailey, Jolene Gansen, Amber Zapata, Lucas Kosobuski, Carrie Lindquist, Patricia D. Olson","doi":"10.24926/IJPS.V7I2.3477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theme issue of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies addresses government/civic partnerships. Do government services always orient toward hierarchies of domination? Our answer is a resounding no. This article offers as evidence the actions of one government funder that removed hierarchical barriers, working in partnership with diverse grantees to envision a program that prioritizes community relevance and participation. Even as our article revolves around a strategic visioning event, it is a culmination of a government funder living out its guiding principles of mutual respect, joint problem solving, and valuing diversity, as well as the values, experiences, and collaborative spirit that diverse grantees brought. Our collective stories offer a clear example of how a partnership-based government program can engage and promote the strengths, needs, and priorities of the community not only because it is the appropriate and respectful approach, but also because it leads to stronger program results.","PeriodicalId":93186,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Government Gets It Right: How a Strategic Visioning Process Aligned Nested Government Systems to Champion Local Relevance and Determination\",\"authors\":\"M. Marczak, Jessica Rochester, T. Bailey, Jolene Gansen, Amber Zapata, Lucas Kosobuski, Carrie Lindquist, Patricia D. Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/IJPS.V7I2.3477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This theme issue of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies addresses government/civic partnerships. Do government services always orient toward hierarchies of domination? Our answer is a resounding no. This article offers as evidence the actions of one government funder that removed hierarchical barriers, working in partnership with diverse grantees to envision a program that prioritizes community relevance and participation. Even as our article revolves around a strategic visioning event, it is a culmination of a government funder living out its guiding principles of mutual respect, joint problem solving, and valuing diversity, as well as the values, experiences, and collaborative spirit that diverse grantees brought. Our collective stories offer a clear example of how a partnership-based government program can engage and promote the strengths, needs, and priorities of the community not only because it is the appropriate and respectful approach, but also because it leads to stronger program results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/IJPS.V7I2.3477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary journal of partnership studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/IJPS.V7I2.3477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本期《跨学科伙伴关系研究杂志》的主题是政府/公民伙伴关系。政府服务总是倾向于统治等级制度吗?我们的答案是否定的。这篇文章提供了一位政府资助者的行动作为证据,该资助者消除了等级壁垒,与不同的受赠人合作,设想一个优先考虑社区相关性和参与的计划。尽管我们的文章围绕着一个战略愿景事件展开,但它是政府资助者践行相互尊重、共同解决问题、重视多样性的指导原则,以及不同受赠人带来的价值观、经验和合作精神的结晶。我们的集体故事提供了一个明确的例子,说明基于伙伴关系的政府计划如何参与和促进社区的优势、需求和优先事项,不仅因为这是一种适当和尊重的方法,还因为它能带来更强大的计划结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Government Gets It Right: How a Strategic Visioning Process Aligned Nested Government Systems to Champion Local Relevance and Determination
This theme issue of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies addresses government/civic partnerships. Do government services always orient toward hierarchies of domination? Our answer is a resounding no. This article offers as evidence the actions of one government funder that removed hierarchical barriers, working in partnership with diverse grantees to envision a program that prioritizes community relevance and participation. Even as our article revolves around a strategic visioning event, it is a culmination of a government funder living out its guiding principles of mutual respect, joint problem solving, and valuing diversity, as well as the values, experiences, and collaborative spirit that diverse grantees brought. Our collective stories offer a clear example of how a partnership-based government program can engage and promote the strengths, needs, and priorities of the community not only because it is the appropriate and respectful approach, but also because it leads to stronger program results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信