利用计算环境下的预测与反思丰富大学生的组合思维

IF 2.3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
E. Lockwood
{"title":"利用计算环境下的预测与反思丰富大学生的组合思维","authors":"E. Lockwood","doi":"10.1080/07370008.2021.2020793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, I discuss undergraduate students’ engagement in basic Python programming while solving combinatorial problems. Students solved tasks that were designed to involve programming, and they were encouraged to engage in activities of prediction and reflection. I provide data from two paired teaching experiments, and I outline how the task design and instructional interventions particularly supported students’ combinatorial reasoning. I argue that emergent computational representations and the prompts for prediction and reflection were especially useful in supporting students’ reasoning about fundamental combinatorial ideas. I argue that this particular mathematical example informs broader notions of disciplinary reflexivity and representational heterogeneity, providing insight into computational thinking practices in the domain of mathematics. Ultimately, I aim to explore the nature of computing and enumeration, shedding light on why the two disciplines are particularly well-suited to support each other. I conclude with implications and avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":47945,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Instruction","volume":"40 1","pages":"413 - 455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Prediction and Reflection in a Computational Setting to Enrich Undergraduate Students’ Combinatorial Thinking\",\"authors\":\"E. Lockwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370008.2021.2020793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper, I discuss undergraduate students’ engagement in basic Python programming while solving combinatorial problems. Students solved tasks that were designed to involve programming, and they were encouraged to engage in activities of prediction and reflection. I provide data from two paired teaching experiments, and I outline how the task design and instructional interventions particularly supported students’ combinatorial reasoning. I argue that emergent computational representations and the prompts for prediction and reflection were especially useful in supporting students’ reasoning about fundamental combinatorial ideas. I argue that this particular mathematical example informs broader notions of disciplinary reflexivity and representational heterogeneity, providing insight into computational thinking practices in the domain of mathematics. Ultimately, I aim to explore the nature of computing and enumeration, shedding light on why the two disciplines are particularly well-suited to support each other. I conclude with implications and avenues for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"413 - 455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2020793\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2020793","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要在本文中,我讨论了本科生在解决组合问题时对基本Python编程的参与。学生们解决了设计涉及编程的任务,并鼓励他们参与预测和反思活动。我提供了两个配对教学实验的数据,并概述了任务设计和教学干预如何特别支持学生的组合推理。我认为,涌现的计算表示以及预测和反思的提示在支持学生对基本组合思想的推理方面尤其有用。我认为,这个特殊的数学例子为学科自反性和表征异质性提供了更广泛的概念,为数学领域的计算思维实践提供了见解。最终,我的目标是探索计算和枚举的本质,阐明为什么这两个学科特别适合相互支持。最后,我提出了对未来研究的启示和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging Prediction and Reflection in a Computational Setting to Enrich Undergraduate Students’ Combinatorial Thinking
Abstract In this paper, I discuss undergraduate students’ engagement in basic Python programming while solving combinatorial problems. Students solved tasks that were designed to involve programming, and they were encouraged to engage in activities of prediction and reflection. I provide data from two paired teaching experiments, and I outline how the task design and instructional interventions particularly supported students’ combinatorial reasoning. I argue that emergent computational representations and the prompts for prediction and reflection were especially useful in supporting students’ reasoning about fundamental combinatorial ideas. I argue that this particular mathematical example informs broader notions of disciplinary reflexivity and representational heterogeneity, providing insight into computational thinking practices in the domain of mathematics. Ultimately, I aim to explore the nature of computing and enumeration, shedding light on why the two disciplines are particularly well-suited to support each other. I conclude with implications and avenues for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Among education journals, Cognition and Instruction"s distinctive niche is rigorous study of foundational issues concerning the mental, socio-cultural, and mediational processes and conditions of learning and intellectual competence. For these purposes, both “cognition” and “instruction” must be interpreted broadly. The journal preferentially attends to the “how” of learning and intellectual practices. A balance of well-reasoned theory and careful and reflective empirical technique is typical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信