撰写大公主义的历史

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Keith Clements
{"title":"撰写大公主义的历史","authors":"Keith Clements","doi":"10.1111/erev.12732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intended as a review of the first volume of the new multi-volume publication <i>A History of the Desire for Christian Unity</i>, this article also considers approaches to the writing of ecumenical history, which can, it asserts, quickly become contested history, and on two fronts. First, ecumenical history cannot isolate itself from the modern, secular approach to historiography, where historical developments are accounted for within the framework of human, social, psychological, economic, and cultural forces without regard to specifically religious factors (still less, divine involvement). Second, advocacy for Christian unity takes different forms, promoted variously by particular churches and traditions, or by the ecumenical organizations themselves, or by certain interest groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":43636,"journal":{"name":"ECUMENICAL REVIEW","volume":"74 4","pages":"671-678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing the History of Ecumenism\",\"authors\":\"Keith Clements\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/erev.12732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intended as a review of the first volume of the new multi-volume publication <i>A History of the Desire for Christian Unity</i>, this article also considers approaches to the writing of ecumenical history, which can, it asserts, quickly become contested history, and on two fronts. First, ecumenical history cannot isolate itself from the modern, secular approach to historiography, where historical developments are accounted for within the framework of human, social, psychological, economic, and cultural forces without regard to specifically religious factors (still less, divine involvement). Second, advocacy for Christian unity takes different forms, promoted variously by particular churches and traditions, or by the ecumenical organizations themselves, or by certain interest groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECUMENICAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"671-678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECUMENICAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/erev.12732\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECUMENICAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/erev.12732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为对新出版的多卷本出版物《渴望基督教合一的历史》第一卷的回顾,本文还考虑了撰写基督教合一历史的方法,它断言,这可能很快成为有争议的历史,并且在两个方面。首先,基督教历史不能将自己与现代的、世俗的史学方法隔离开来,在现代的、世俗的史学方法中,历史的发展是在人类、社会、心理、经济和文化力量的框架内进行的,而不考虑具体的宗教因素(更不用说神的参与)。第二,对基督教合一的倡导有不同的形式,由特定的教会和传统,或由基督教组织本身,或由某些利益集团以不同的方式推动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing the History of Ecumenism

Intended as a review of the first volume of the new multi-volume publication A History of the Desire for Christian Unity, this article also considers approaches to the writing of ecumenical history, which can, it asserts, quickly become contested history, and on two fronts. First, ecumenical history cannot isolate itself from the modern, secular approach to historiography, where historical developments are accounted for within the framework of human, social, psychological, economic, and cultural forces without regard to specifically religious factors (still less, divine involvement). Second, advocacy for Christian unity takes different forms, promoted variously by particular churches and traditions, or by the ecumenical organizations themselves, or by certain interest groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ECUMENICAL REVIEW
ECUMENICAL REVIEW RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Ecumenical Review is a quarterly theological journal. Each issue focuses on a theme of current importance to the movement for Christian unity, and each volume includes academic as well as practical analysis of significant moments in the quest for closer church fellowship and inter-religious dialogue. Recent issues have communicated the visions of a new generation of ecumenical leadership, the voices of women involved in Orthodox-Protestant conversations, churches" ministries in an age of HIV/AIDS and a celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信