扫盲研究的终结——重读布兰特和克林顿的《地方的局限》

IF 1.4 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Daniel E. Ferguson, Amélie Lemieux
{"title":"扫盲研究的终结——重读布兰特和克林顿的《地方的局限》","authors":"Daniel E. Ferguson, Amélie Lemieux","doi":"10.1177/1086296X221096671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In processing the impact of the pandemic amidst other global crises, we found rereading Brandt and Clinton's “The Limits of the Local” article, published 20 years ago next year, to offer much, both theoretically and practically. Written within its own tumultuous time, according to its editors, it argues for transcontextualizing accounts of literacy and employing thingness as a means to subvert local/global dichotomies in literacy studies. In this essay, we reflect on this work 20 years later, and propose an extension of Brandt and Clinton's transcontextualizing perspective through an affirmative ontology of éclosion. We hope this actualization will provide an orientation for furthering transcontextual literacy studies that meet the urgency of our own tumultuous times.","PeriodicalId":47294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"54 1","pages":"208 - 215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Éclosions in Literacy Research: Rereading Brandt and Clinton’s “Limits of the Local”\",\"authors\":\"Daniel E. Ferguson, Amélie Lemieux\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1086296X221096671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In processing the impact of the pandemic amidst other global crises, we found rereading Brandt and Clinton's “The Limits of the Local” article, published 20 years ago next year, to offer much, both theoretically and practically. Written within its own tumultuous time, according to its editors, it argues for transcontextualizing accounts of literacy and employing thingness as a means to subvert local/global dichotomies in literacy studies. In this essay, we reflect on this work 20 years later, and propose an extension of Brandt and Clinton's transcontextualizing perspective through an affirmative ontology of éclosion. We hope this actualization will provide an orientation for furthering transcontextual literacy studies that meet the urgency of our own tumultuous times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Literacy Research\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"208 - 215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Literacy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X221096671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Literacy Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X221096671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在处理疫情在其他全球危机中的影响时,我们发现重读布兰特和克林顿20年前于明年发表的《地方的极限》一文,无论是理论上还是实践上,都能提供很多东西。据其编辑称,这本书是在其动荡的时代写成的,它主张将识字的描述文本化,并将物性作为颠覆识字研究中地方/全球二分制的一种手段。在这篇文章中,我们对20年后的这项工作进行了反思,并通过一种肯定的封闭本体论,对布兰特和克林顿的跨文本化视角进行了扩展。我们希望这一实现将为进一步推进跨文本识字研究提供一个方向,以满足我们动荡时代的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Éclosions in Literacy Research: Rereading Brandt and Clinton’s “Limits of the Local”
In processing the impact of the pandemic amidst other global crises, we found rereading Brandt and Clinton's “The Limits of the Local” article, published 20 years ago next year, to offer much, both theoretically and practically. Written within its own tumultuous time, according to its editors, it argues for transcontextualizing accounts of literacy and employing thingness as a means to subvert local/global dichotomies in literacy studies. In this essay, we reflect on this work 20 years later, and propose an extension of Brandt and Clinton's transcontextualizing perspective through an affirmative ontology of éclosion. We hope this actualization will provide an orientation for furthering transcontextual literacy studies that meet the urgency of our own tumultuous times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Journal of Literacy Research (JLR) is a peer-reviewed journal contributes to the advancement research related to literacy and literacy education. Current focuses include, but are not limited to: -Literacies from preschool to adulthood -Evolving and expanding definitions of ‘literacy’ -Innovative applications of theory, pedagogy and instruction -Methodological developments in literacy and language research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信