{"title":"新加坡海岛小说中的边缘性与乡愁","authors":"S. Perks","doi":"10.1080/14649373.2023.2182937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Singapore’s celebrated economic development during the post-independence period involved the wholesale reshaping of Singapore’s landscape. This had well-documented effects upon Singaporean cultural imaginaries and public history. The transformation of Singapore’s rivers and peripheral islands, however, is rarely cited in the national narrative. Many of Singapore’s peripheral islands were repurposed during the development drive, as islanders were relocated to the main island and supplanted by oil refineries, tourism attractions, and landfill. Commemoration of this history of resettlement is scant, and the islands remain peripheral and relatively inaccessible to most Singaporeans. This article draws on Vyjayanthi Rao’s conceptualisation of the “city-as-archive” in tandem with Elizabeth DeLoughrey’s “tidalectics” to put forward a method of reading literature for its fluid construction of historical meaning in relation to places. By positioning Singapore’s islands and rivers in world-historical processes, it explores representations of living cultures and cultural memory to show how the bounded places of the southern islands and Seletar Reservoir act as repositories for cultural memory and practice. Through analysis of Isa Kamari’s novel Rawa and Suratman Markasan’s novel Penghulu, this article foregrounds these peripheries, illustrating how cultural histories are brought to the fore as living and dynamic, rather than merely preserved.","PeriodicalId":46080,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","volume":"24 1","pages":"223 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripherality and nostalgia in Singapore island fiction\",\"authors\":\"S. Perks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649373.2023.2182937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Singapore’s celebrated economic development during the post-independence period involved the wholesale reshaping of Singapore’s landscape. This had well-documented effects upon Singaporean cultural imaginaries and public history. The transformation of Singapore’s rivers and peripheral islands, however, is rarely cited in the national narrative. Many of Singapore’s peripheral islands were repurposed during the development drive, as islanders were relocated to the main island and supplanted by oil refineries, tourism attractions, and landfill. Commemoration of this history of resettlement is scant, and the islands remain peripheral and relatively inaccessible to most Singaporeans. This article draws on Vyjayanthi Rao’s conceptualisation of the “city-as-archive” in tandem with Elizabeth DeLoughrey’s “tidalectics” to put forward a method of reading literature for its fluid construction of historical meaning in relation to places. By positioning Singapore’s islands and rivers in world-historical processes, it explores representations of living cultures and cultural memory to show how the bounded places of the southern islands and Seletar Reservoir act as repositories for cultural memory and practice. Through analysis of Isa Kamari’s novel Rawa and Suratman Markasan’s novel Penghulu, this article foregrounds these peripheries, illustrating how cultural histories are brought to the fore as living and dynamic, rather than merely preserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2182937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Asia Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2023.2182937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peripherality and nostalgia in Singapore island fiction
ABSTRACT Singapore’s celebrated economic development during the post-independence period involved the wholesale reshaping of Singapore’s landscape. This had well-documented effects upon Singaporean cultural imaginaries and public history. The transformation of Singapore’s rivers and peripheral islands, however, is rarely cited in the national narrative. Many of Singapore’s peripheral islands were repurposed during the development drive, as islanders were relocated to the main island and supplanted by oil refineries, tourism attractions, and landfill. Commemoration of this history of resettlement is scant, and the islands remain peripheral and relatively inaccessible to most Singaporeans. This article draws on Vyjayanthi Rao’s conceptualisation of the “city-as-archive” in tandem with Elizabeth DeLoughrey’s “tidalectics” to put forward a method of reading literature for its fluid construction of historical meaning in relation to places. By positioning Singapore’s islands and rivers in world-historical processes, it explores representations of living cultures and cultural memory to show how the bounded places of the southern islands and Seletar Reservoir act as repositories for cultural memory and practice. Through analysis of Isa Kamari’s novel Rawa and Suratman Markasan’s novel Penghulu, this article foregrounds these peripheries, illustrating how cultural histories are brought to the fore as living and dynamic, rather than merely preserved.
期刊介绍:
The cultural question is among the most important yet difficult subjects facing inter-Asia today. Throughout the 20th century, worldwide competition over capital, colonial history, and the Cold War has jeopardized interactions among cultures. Globalization of technology, regionalization of economy and the end of the Cold War have opened up a unique opportunity for cultural exchanges to take place. In response to global cultural changes, cultural studies has emerged internationally as an energetic field of scholarship. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies gives a long overdue voice, throughout the global intellectual community, to those concerned with inter-Asia processes.