在早期学习环境中为创伤咨询服务生成程序理论:使用现实主义方法论的见解

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. Blewitt, Rachael Bajayo, Lee Cameron, Yihan Sun, Heather Morris, H. Skouteris
{"title":"在早期学习环境中为创伤咨询服务生成程序理论:使用现实主义方法论的见解","authors":"C. Blewitt, Rachael Bajayo, Lee Cameron, Yihan Sun, Heather Morris, H. Skouteris","doi":"10.1177/18369391221146630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Realist research is increasingly used to evaluate complex interventions. However, it can be challenging to codify and implement, with few examples to guide the process. This article describes how a team of social care leaders, practitioners and researchers developed initial program theories for the Trauma Consultancy Service (TraCS) in early learning settings, as the first phase of a realist evaluation. It explores conceptualisation of realist terminology, design and facilitation of realist interviews, and data coding and analysis using retroductive reasoning. Qualitative interviews with the TraCS team focused on understanding contextual factors, resources provided by TraCS consultants, changes in educators’ reasoning and how components interacted to generate educator and child outcomes. Eight program theories capture how TraCS supports educators to develop a trauma-informed lens and practice. This research contributes to understanding of the benefits of welfare sector-driven consultancy in early childhood.","PeriodicalId":46779,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood","volume":"48 1","pages":"163 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generating program theories for a trauma consultancy service in early learning settings: Insights on using realist methodology\",\"authors\":\"C. Blewitt, Rachael Bajayo, Lee Cameron, Yihan Sun, Heather Morris, H. Skouteris\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18369391221146630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Realist research is increasingly used to evaluate complex interventions. However, it can be challenging to codify and implement, with few examples to guide the process. This article describes how a team of social care leaders, practitioners and researchers developed initial program theories for the Trauma Consultancy Service (TraCS) in early learning settings, as the first phase of a realist evaluation. It explores conceptualisation of realist terminology, design and facilitation of realist interviews, and data coding and analysis using retroductive reasoning. Qualitative interviews with the TraCS team focused on understanding contextual factors, resources provided by TraCS consultants, changes in educators’ reasoning and how components interacted to generate educator and child outcomes. Eight program theories capture how TraCS supports educators to develop a trauma-informed lens and practice. This research contributes to understanding of the benefits of welfare sector-driven consultancy in early childhood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391221146630\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391221146630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现实主义研究越来越多地用于评估复杂的干预措施。然而,编写和实现它可能具有挑战性,因为很少有示例来指导该过程。这篇文章描述了一个由社会关怀领导者、从业者和研究人员组成的团队是如何在早期学习环境中为创伤咨询服务(TraCS)开发最初的项目理论的,作为现实主义评估的第一阶段。它探讨了现实主义术语的概念化,现实主义访谈的设计和促进,以及使用回溯推理的数据编码和分析。与TraCS团队的定性访谈侧重于了解环境因素、TraCS顾问提供的资源、教育者推理的变化以及各部分如何相互作用以产生教育者和儿童的结果。八个项目理论阐述了TraCS如何支持教育工作者发展创伤知识的视角和实践。这项研究有助于理解福利部门驱动的儿童早期咨询的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generating program theories for a trauma consultancy service in early learning settings: Insights on using realist methodology
Realist research is increasingly used to evaluate complex interventions. However, it can be challenging to codify and implement, with few examples to guide the process. This article describes how a team of social care leaders, practitioners and researchers developed initial program theories for the Trauma Consultancy Service (TraCS) in early learning settings, as the first phase of a realist evaluation. It explores conceptualisation of realist terminology, design and facilitation of realist interviews, and data coding and analysis using retroductive reasoning. Qualitative interviews with the TraCS team focused on understanding contextual factors, resources provided by TraCS consultants, changes in educators’ reasoning and how components interacted to generate educator and child outcomes. Eight program theories capture how TraCS supports educators to develop a trauma-informed lens and practice. This research contributes to understanding of the benefits of welfare sector-driven consultancy in early childhood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood
Australasian Journal of Early Childhood EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Australasian Journal of Early Childhood (AJEC) is Australasia’s foremost scholarly journal and the world’s longest-running major journal within the early childhood education and care sector. Published quarterly, AJEC offers evidence-based articles that are designed to impart new information and encourage the critical exchange of ideas among early childhood practitioners, academics and students. AJEC is peer reviewed by leading early childhood education and care academics, against quality-assurance guidelines to ensure that all articles promote best practice and disseminate high-quality information in the early childhood education and care sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信