后人道主义对教学的挑战或教学对后人道主义的挑战:教育接近性的新人道主义建议

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anna Kouppanou
{"title":"后人道主义对教学的挑战或教学对后人道主义的挑战:教育接近性的新人道主义建议","authors":"Anna Kouppanou","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2022.2033534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Pedagogical approaches emanating from posthumanist and neomaterialist theoretical frameworks can potentially redefine what learning and teaching are. In this paper, I argue, however, that these discussions are marked by a distinct absence, having to do with the role of teachers and the nature of teaching itself. Attempting to make up for this lack, I discuss here posthumanism’s and neomaterialism’s critique of humanism – indeed, in connection to certain reconfigurations of agency as relationality existing between human and non-human species and of learning as encounter between species. I then deliberate on an alternative kind of agency that reconfigures existence, as posthumanism and neomaterialsm do, but also salvages some useful aspects of human agency, which are necessary for discussing teaching and learning. In this way, I am finally able to describe a type of neohumanism illuminated by the state of being a child (childness) and by a certain reconceptualization of teaching and learning.","PeriodicalId":47908,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"766 - 784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The posthumanist challenge to teaching or teaching’s challenge to posthumanism: a neohumanist proposal of nearness in education\",\"authors\":\"Anna Kouppanou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01596306.2022.2033534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Pedagogical approaches emanating from posthumanist and neomaterialist theoretical frameworks can potentially redefine what learning and teaching are. In this paper, I argue, however, that these discussions are marked by a distinct absence, having to do with the role of teachers and the nature of teaching itself. Attempting to make up for this lack, I discuss here posthumanism’s and neomaterialism’s critique of humanism – indeed, in connection to certain reconfigurations of agency as relationality existing between human and non-human species and of learning as encounter between species. I then deliberate on an alternative kind of agency that reconfigures existence, as posthumanism and neomaterialsm do, but also salvages some useful aspects of human agency, which are necessary for discussing teaching and learning. In this way, I am finally able to describe a type of neohumanism illuminated by the state of being a child (childness) and by a certain reconceptualization of teaching and learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"766 - 784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2033534\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2033534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

源自后人文主义和新唯物主义理论框架的教育学方法可能会重新定义什么是学习和教学。然而,在本文中,我认为,这些讨论明显缺乏,这与教师的角色和教学本身的性质有关。为了弥补这一不足,我在这里讨论了后人文主义和新唯物主义对人本主义的批判——事实上,将能动性重新定义为人类和非人类物种之间存在的关系,将学习重新定义为物种之间的相遇。然后,我思考了一种替代性的能动性,它重新定义了存在,就像后人文主义和新材料主义一样,但也挽救了人类能动性的一些有用方面,这些方面对于讨论教学是必要的。通过这种方式,我终于能够描述一种新人文主义,这种新人文主义是由作为一个孩子的状态(儿童)和对教学的某种重新定义所照亮的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The posthumanist challenge to teaching or teaching’s challenge to posthumanism: a neohumanist proposal of nearness in education
ABSTRACT Pedagogical approaches emanating from posthumanist and neomaterialist theoretical frameworks can potentially redefine what learning and teaching are. In this paper, I argue, however, that these discussions are marked by a distinct absence, having to do with the role of teachers and the nature of teaching itself. Attempting to make up for this lack, I discuss here posthumanism’s and neomaterialism’s critique of humanism – indeed, in connection to certain reconfigurations of agency as relationality existing between human and non-human species and of learning as encounter between species. I then deliberate on an alternative kind of agency that reconfigures existence, as posthumanism and neomaterialsm do, but also salvages some useful aspects of human agency, which are necessary for discussing teaching and learning. In this way, I am finally able to describe a type of neohumanism illuminated by the state of being a child (childness) and by a certain reconceptualization of teaching and learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Discourse is an international, fully peer-reviewed journal publishing contemporary research and theorising in the cultural politics of education. The journal publishes academic articles from throughout the world which contribute to contemporary debates on the new social, cultural and political configurations that now mark education as a highly contested but important cultural site. Discourse adopts a broadly critical orientation, but is not tied to any particular ideological, disciplinary or methodological position. It encourages interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of educational theory, policy and practice. It welcomes papers which explore speculative ideas in education, are written in innovative ways, or are presented in experimental ways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信