测量对整体设备有效性结果的先入为主的信念-汽车制造业的一个案例研究

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
M. Bengtsson, L. Andersson, Pontus Ekström
{"title":"测量对整体设备有效性结果的先入为主的信念-汽车制造业的一个案例研究","authors":"M. Bengtsson, L. Andersson, Pontus Ekström","doi":"10.1108/JQME-03-2020-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of the study is to test if it, by the use of a survey methodology, is possible to measure managers’ awareness on, and specifically if there exist preconceived beliefs on, overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) results. The paper presents the design of the survey methodology as well as a test of the survey in one case company. Design/methodology/approach – Actual OEE logs from a case company are collected and a survey on the data is designed and managers at the same case company are asked to answer the survey. The survey results are followed-up by an interview study in order to get deeper insights to both the results of the survey as well as the OEE strategy at the case company. Findings – The findings show that the managers at this particular case company, on a general level, does not suffer too much from preconceived beliefs. However, it is clear that the managers have a preconceived belief that lack of material is logged as a loss much more often than what it actually is. Research limitations/implications – The test has only been performed with data from one case company within the automotive manufacturing industry and only the managers at that case company has been active in the test. Practical implications –The surveymethodology can be replicated and used by other companies to find out how aware their employees are on their OEE results and if possible preconceived beliefs exists. Originality/value – To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt at measuring if preconceived beliefs on OEE results exist.","PeriodicalId":16938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring preconceived beliefs on the results of overall equipment effectiveness – A case study in the automotive manufacturing industry\",\"authors\":\"M. Bengtsson, L. Andersson, Pontus Ekström\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JQME-03-2020-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of the study is to test if it, by the use of a survey methodology, is possible to measure managers’ awareness on, and specifically if there exist preconceived beliefs on, overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) results. The paper presents the design of the survey methodology as well as a test of the survey in one case company. Design/methodology/approach – Actual OEE logs from a case company are collected and a survey on the data is designed and managers at the same case company are asked to answer the survey. The survey results are followed-up by an interview study in order to get deeper insights to both the results of the survey as well as the OEE strategy at the case company. Findings – The findings show that the managers at this particular case company, on a general level, does not suffer too much from preconceived beliefs. However, it is clear that the managers have a preconceived belief that lack of material is logged as a loss much more often than what it actually is. Research limitations/implications – The test has only been performed with data from one case company within the automotive manufacturing industry and only the managers at that case company has been active in the test. Practical implications –The surveymethodology can be replicated and used by other companies to find out how aware their employees are on their OEE results and if possible preconceived beliefs exists. Originality/value – To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt at measuring if preconceived beliefs on OEE results exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-03-2020-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-03-2020-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的-该研究的目的是测试是否可以通过使用调查方法来衡量管理人员对整体设备有效性(OEE)结果的认识,特别是是否存在先入为主的信念。本文介绍了调查方法的设计,并在一个案例公司中对调查结果进行了检验。设计/方法/方法-收集案例公司的实际OEE日志,设计数据调查,并要求同一案例公司的经理回答调查。调查结果通过访谈研究跟进,以便对调查结果和案例公司的OEE战略有更深入的了解。调查结果-调查结果表明,在这个特殊案例公司的经理,在一般水平上,没有太多的先入为主的信念。然而,很明显,管理人员有一种先入为主的信念,认为缺乏材料被记录为损失的情况要比实际情况多得多。研究限制/影响-该测试仅使用了汽车制造行业中一家案例公司的数据,并且只有该案例公司的管理人员参与了测试。实际意义-调查方法可以被其他公司复制和使用,以了解他们的员工对他们的OEE结果的了解程度,以及是否可能存在先入为主的信念。原创性/价值——据作者所知,这是第一次尝试衡量是否存在对电子商务效率结果的先入为主的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring preconceived beliefs on the results of overall equipment effectiveness – A case study in the automotive manufacturing industry
Purpose – The purpose of the study is to test if it, by the use of a survey methodology, is possible to measure managers’ awareness on, and specifically if there exist preconceived beliefs on, overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) results. The paper presents the design of the survey methodology as well as a test of the survey in one case company. Design/methodology/approach – Actual OEE logs from a case company are collected and a survey on the data is designed and managers at the same case company are asked to answer the survey. The survey results are followed-up by an interview study in order to get deeper insights to both the results of the survey as well as the OEE strategy at the case company. Findings – The findings show that the managers at this particular case company, on a general level, does not suffer too much from preconceived beliefs. However, it is clear that the managers have a preconceived belief that lack of material is logged as a loss much more often than what it actually is. Research limitations/implications – The test has only been performed with data from one case company within the automotive manufacturing industry and only the managers at that case company has been active in the test. Practical implications –The surveymethodology can be replicated and used by other companies to find out how aware their employees are on their OEE results and if possible preconceived beliefs exists. Originality/value – To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt at measuring if preconceived beliefs on OEE results exist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering
Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: This exciting journal looks at maintenance engineering from a positive standpoint, and clarifies its recently elevatedstatus as a highly technical, scientific, and complex field. Typical areas examined include: ■Budget and control ■Equipment management ■Maintenance information systems ■Process capability and maintenance ■Process monitoring techniques ■Reliability-based maintenance ■Replacement and life cycle costs ■TQM and maintenance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信