学生举报政策对举报同学不当行为的实验效果

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
F. DeZoort
{"title":"学生举报政策对举报同学不当行为的实验效果","authors":"F. DeZoort","doi":"10.2308/issues-2021-062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite the effectiveness of whistleblower programs in business, student policies for reporting classmate misconduct are extremely rare. This experimental study evaluates the effects a student whistleblower policy has on student likelihood of reporting classmate misconduct. Specifically, 309 undergraduate and graduate students participated in a study that manipulates whistleblower policy source randomly between-subjects. The results indicate that students receiving a professor-based policy report a higher likelihood of reporting classmate misconduct than students receiving a university-based policy or no policy at all. Students in the professor policy group also report taking the policy more seriously than students in the other two groups, while having a similarly high level of trust in the policy’s confidentiality pledge. No significant difference in whistleblowing likelihood is found between the university policy and no policy groups. The results also indicate that perceived responsibility for reporting mediates the policy-reporting link, highlighting the need to encourage student responsibility.","PeriodicalId":46324,"journal":{"name":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experimental Effects of a Student Whistleblower Policy on Reporting Classmate Misconduct\",\"authors\":\"F. DeZoort\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/issues-2021-062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Despite the effectiveness of whistleblower programs in business, student policies for reporting classmate misconduct are extremely rare. This experimental study evaluates the effects a student whistleblower policy has on student likelihood of reporting classmate misconduct. Specifically, 309 undergraduate and graduate students participated in a study that manipulates whistleblower policy source randomly between-subjects. The results indicate that students receiving a professor-based policy report a higher likelihood of reporting classmate misconduct than students receiving a university-based policy or no policy at all. Students in the professor policy group also report taking the policy more seriously than students in the other two groups, while having a similarly high level of trust in the policy’s confidentiality pledge. No significant difference in whistleblowing likelihood is found between the university policy and no policy groups. The results also indicate that perceived responsibility for reporting mediates the policy-reporting link, highlighting the need to encourage student responsibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2021-062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2021-062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管商业领域的举报项目卓有成效,但学生举报同学不当行为的政策却极为罕见。本实验研究评估学生举报政策对学生举报同学不当行为可能性的影响。具体而言,309名本科生和研究生参与了一项在受试者之间随机操纵举报人政策来源的研究。结果表明,收到以教授为基础的政策报告的学生比收到以大学为基础的政策或根本没有政策的学生更有可能报告同学的不当行为。教授政策组的学生也比其他两个组的学生更认真地对待这项政策,同时对政策的保密承诺也有同样高的信任度。大学政策组和无政策组的举报可能性无显著差异。结果还表明,对报告的感知责任介导了政策报告的联系,突出了鼓励学生责任的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Experimental Effects of a Student Whistleblower Policy on Reporting Classmate Misconduct
Despite the effectiveness of whistleblower programs in business, student policies for reporting classmate misconduct are extremely rare. This experimental study evaluates the effects a student whistleblower policy has on student likelihood of reporting classmate misconduct. Specifically, 309 undergraduate and graduate students participated in a study that manipulates whistleblower policy source randomly between-subjects. The results indicate that students receiving a professor-based policy report a higher likelihood of reporting classmate misconduct than students receiving a university-based policy or no policy at all. Students in the professor policy group also report taking the policy more seriously than students in the other two groups, while having a similarly high level of trust in the policy’s confidentiality pledge. No significant difference in whistleblowing likelihood is found between the university policy and no policy groups. The results also indicate that perceived responsibility for reporting mediates the policy-reporting link, highlighting the need to encourage student responsibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The mission of Issues in Accounting Education is to publish research, commentaries, instructional resources, and book reviews that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. The journal will consist of two major sections, “Research and Commentary” and “Instructional Resources”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信