IF 0.3 0 THEATER
Graham Saunders
{"title":"#MeToo Pinter and David Mamet’s Oleanna","authors":"Graham Saunders","doi":"10.5325/haropintrevi.7.1.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While reviews of David Mamet’s last stage play Bitter Wheat (2019) have dismissed it as a misjudged reaction, both to the Harvey Weinstein and #MeToo movement, when it premiered in London, his earlier play Oleanna (1992) had a more profound effect on debates around sexual politics in the early 1990s. This article looks at Harold Pinter’s direction of the 1993 London premiere of Oleanna. Drawing closely on archival materials from the David Mamet, Harold Pinter, and Royal Court archives, discussion will focus on Pinter’s use of Mamet’s rejected original ending that gives the character of Carol greater agency. Given Pinter’s insistence that Carol’s accusations of rape against her tutor have absolute legitimacy, the article also argues that this attitude offers a reassessment on how issues of sexual consent and assault can be interpreted in his own drama, especially when—as like Mamet—Pinter has been periodically criticized for misogynism.","PeriodicalId":40140,"journal":{"name":"Harold Pinter Review-Essays on Contemporary Drama","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harold Pinter Review-Essays on Contemporary Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/haropintrevi.7.1.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对大卫·马梅特上一部舞台剧《苦小麦》(2019)的评论认为这是对哈维·韦恩斯坦和#MeToo运动的误判,当时该剧在伦敦首演,但他早期的戏剧《奥莉安娜》(1992)对20世纪90年代初围绕性政治的辩论产生了更深远的影响。这篇文章着眼于哈罗德·品特对1993年《奥莉安娜》伦敦首映式的指导。根据David Mamet、Harold Pinter和皇家宫廷档案中的档案材料,讨论将集中在Pinter对Mamet被拒绝的原始结局的使用上,这赋予了Carol这个角色更大的代理权。鉴于品特坚持认为卡罗尔对其导师的强奸指控具有绝对合法性,文章还认为,这种态度重新评估了性同意和性侵犯问题在他自己的戏剧中如何被解读,尤其是当品特和玛米特一样,因厌女症而定期受到批评时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
#MeToo Pinter and David Mamet’s Oleanna
While reviews of David Mamet’s last stage play Bitter Wheat (2019) have dismissed it as a misjudged reaction, both to the Harvey Weinstein and #MeToo movement, when it premiered in London, his earlier play Oleanna (1992) had a more profound effect on debates around sexual politics in the early 1990s. This article looks at Harold Pinter’s direction of the 1993 London premiere of Oleanna. Drawing closely on archival materials from the David Mamet, Harold Pinter, and Royal Court archives, discussion will focus on Pinter’s use of Mamet’s rejected original ending that gives the character of Carol greater agency. Given Pinter’s insistence that Carol’s accusations of rape against her tutor have absolute legitimacy, the article also argues that this attitude offers a reassessment on how issues of sexual consent and assault can be interpreted in his own drama, especially when—as like Mamet—Pinter has been periodically criticized for misogynism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信