Jeonghyun Lee, JunYeong Jeong, Jaeha Lee, Jae Yong Lee, Ji Ho Choi
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者气道正压治疗失败后重新处方气道正压治疗的依从性","authors":"Jeonghyun Lee, JunYeong Jeong, Jaeha Lee, Jae Yong Lee, Ji Ho Choi","doi":"10.18787/jr.2022.00417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Little is known about studies evaluating positive airway pressure (PAP) compliance after re-prescription. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate PAP compliance after re-prescription in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who failed initial PAP therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed OSA patients who had received a re-prescription for PAP from March 2020 to June 2021. We compared the compliance rate between initial prescription and re-prescription for PAP and investigated the reasons for PAP failure after the first prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 consecutive OSA patients (mean age=45.6±13.7 years and male:female=8:2) who received a re-prescription for PAP were included. Of them, 8 patients (80%) met the compliance criteria (i.e., Korean National Health Insurance criteria) for PAP after re-prescription. The compliance rate increased from 36.3±18.2% (initial prescription) to 61.3±28.8% (re-prescription); this was not of statistical significance (p=0.074). PAP/mask-related discomfort was the most common reason for PAP failure, followed by nasal obstruction, unintentional mask removal, and pressure-related discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if initial PAP therapy fails, the proportion of patients who meet the compliance criteria may be improved through various forms of clinical aid and support after re-prescription of PAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":33935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliance After Re-Prescription for Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Who Failed Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jeonghyun Lee, JunYeong Jeong, Jaeha Lee, Jae Yong Lee, Ji Ho Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.18787/jr.2022.00417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Little is known about studies evaluating positive airway pressure (PAP) compliance after re-prescription. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate PAP compliance after re-prescription in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who failed initial PAP therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed OSA patients who had received a re-prescription for PAP from March 2020 to June 2021. We compared the compliance rate between initial prescription and re-prescription for PAP and investigated the reasons for PAP failure after the first prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 consecutive OSA patients (mean age=45.6±13.7 years and male:female=8:2) who received a re-prescription for PAP were included. Of them, 8 patients (80%) met the compliance criteria (i.e., Korean National Health Insurance criteria) for PAP after re-prescription. The compliance rate increased from 36.3±18.2% (initial prescription) to 61.3±28.8% (re-prescription); this was not of statistical significance (p=0.074). PAP/mask-related discomfort was the most common reason for PAP failure, followed by nasal obstruction, unintentional mask removal, and pressure-related discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if initial PAP therapy fails, the proportion of patients who meet the compliance criteria may be improved through various forms of clinical aid and support after re-prescription of PAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"148-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2022.00417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2022.00417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compliance After Re-Prescription for Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Who Failed Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.
Background and objectives: Little is known about studies evaluating positive airway pressure (PAP) compliance after re-prescription. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate PAP compliance after re-prescription in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who failed initial PAP therapy.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed OSA patients who had received a re-prescription for PAP from March 2020 to June 2021. We compared the compliance rate between initial prescription and re-prescription for PAP and investigated the reasons for PAP failure after the first prescription.
Results: A total of 10 consecutive OSA patients (mean age=45.6±13.7 years and male:female=8:2) who received a re-prescription for PAP were included. Of them, 8 patients (80%) met the compliance criteria (i.e., Korean National Health Insurance criteria) for PAP after re-prescription. The compliance rate increased from 36.3±18.2% (initial prescription) to 61.3±28.8% (re-prescription); this was not of statistical significance (p=0.074). PAP/mask-related discomfort was the most common reason for PAP failure, followed by nasal obstruction, unintentional mask removal, and pressure-related discomfort.
Conclusion: Even if initial PAP therapy fails, the proportion of patients who meet the compliance criteria may be improved through various forms of clinical aid and support after re-prescription of PAP.