评估跟腱断裂在线信息的可读性

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Olivia D. Perez, Hasani W. Swindell, Carl L. Herndon, P. Noback, David P. Trofa, J. T. Vosseller
{"title":"评估跟腱断裂在线信息的可读性","authors":"Olivia D. Perez, Hasani W. Swindell, Carl L. Herndon, P. Noback, David P. Trofa, J. T. Vosseller","doi":"10.1177/1938640019888058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) currently suggest that health care materials be written at a sixth-grade reading level. Our study investigates the readability of online information on Achilles rupture and reconstruction. Achilles tendon rupture, Achilles tendon repair, and Achilles tendon reconstruction were queried using advanced search functions of Google, Bing, and Yahoo!. Individual websites and text from the first 3 pages of results for each search engine were recorded and categorized as physician based, academic, commercial, government and nongovernmental organization, or unspecified. Individual readability scores were calculated via 6 different indices: Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau index, and Automated Readability Index along with a readability classification score and average grade level. A total of 56 websites were assessed. Academic webpages composed the majority (51.8%), followed by physician-based sources (32.1%). The average overall grade level was 10.7 ± 2.54. Academic websites were written at the highest-grade level (11.5 ± 2.77), significantly higher than physician-based websites (P = .040), and only 2 were written at, or below, a sixth-grade reading level. Currently, online information on Achilles tendon rupture and reconstruction is written at an inappropriately high reading level compared with recommendations from the AMA and NIH. Level of Evidence: Level IV","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"13 1","pages":"470 - 477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640019888058","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Achilles Tendon Ruptures\",\"authors\":\"Olivia D. Perez, Hasani W. Swindell, Carl L. Herndon, P. Noback, David P. Trofa, J. T. Vosseller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1938640019888058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) currently suggest that health care materials be written at a sixth-grade reading level. Our study investigates the readability of online information on Achilles rupture and reconstruction. Achilles tendon rupture, Achilles tendon repair, and Achilles tendon reconstruction were queried using advanced search functions of Google, Bing, and Yahoo!. Individual websites and text from the first 3 pages of results for each search engine were recorded and categorized as physician based, academic, commercial, government and nongovernmental organization, or unspecified. Individual readability scores were calculated via 6 different indices: Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau index, and Automated Readability Index along with a readability classification score and average grade level. A total of 56 websites were assessed. Academic webpages composed the majority (51.8%), followed by physician-based sources (32.1%). The average overall grade level was 10.7 ± 2.54. Academic websites were written at the highest-grade level (11.5 ± 2.77), significantly higher than physician-based websites (P = .040), and only 2 were written at, or below, a sixth-grade reading level. Currently, online information on Achilles tendon rupture and reconstruction is written at an inappropriately high reading level compared with recommendations from the AMA and NIH. Level of Evidence: Level IV\",\"PeriodicalId\":39271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"470 - 477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640019888058\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640019888058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640019888058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

美国医学协会(AMA)和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)目前建议,医疗保健材料应达到六年级的阅读水平。我们的研究调查了关于跟腱断裂和重建的在线信息的可读性。使用谷歌、必应和雅虎的高级搜索功能查询跟腱断裂、跟腱修复和跟腱重建!。记录每个搜索引擎的个人网站和前3页搜索结果的文本,并将其分类为医生、学术、商业、政府和非政府组织,或未指明。个人可读性得分通过6个不同的指数计算:Flesch-Kincaid等级水平、Flesch-Reading Ease、Gunning Fog、SMOG、Coleman-Liau指数和自动化可读性指数,以及可读性分类得分和平均等级水平。共对56个网站进行了评估。学术网页占大多数(51.8%),其次是基于医生的来源(32.1%)。平均总体评分水平为10.7±2.54。学术网站的写作水平最高(11.5±2.77),显著高于基于医生的网站(P=.040),只有2个网站的阅读水平达到或低于六年级。目前,与美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院的建议相比,关于跟腱断裂和重建的在线信息的阅读水平过高。证据级别:四级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Readability of Online Information About Achilles Tendon Ruptures
The American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) currently suggest that health care materials be written at a sixth-grade reading level. Our study investigates the readability of online information on Achilles rupture and reconstruction. Achilles tendon rupture, Achilles tendon repair, and Achilles tendon reconstruction were queried using advanced search functions of Google, Bing, and Yahoo!. Individual websites and text from the first 3 pages of results for each search engine were recorded and categorized as physician based, academic, commercial, government and nongovernmental organization, or unspecified. Individual readability scores were calculated via 6 different indices: Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, Gunning Fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau index, and Automated Readability Index along with a readability classification score and average grade level. A total of 56 websites were assessed. Academic webpages composed the majority (51.8%), followed by physician-based sources (32.1%). The average overall grade level was 10.7 ± 2.54. Academic websites were written at the highest-grade level (11.5 ± 2.77), significantly higher than physician-based websites (P = .040), and only 2 were written at, or below, a sixth-grade reading level. Currently, online information on Achilles tendon rupture and reconstruction is written at an inappropriately high reading level compared with recommendations from the AMA and NIH. Level of Evidence: Level IV
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信