外科Apgar评分在预测发病率和死亡率中的作用:一项前瞻性研究

Q4 Medicine
Harsha A. Huliyappa, Sreevathsa Ramachar
{"title":"外科Apgar评分在预测发病率和死亡率中的作用:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Harsha A. Huliyappa, Sreevathsa Ramachar","doi":"10.29089/paom/137489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimization of postoperative care is often contingent upon the risk stratification tools such as surgical scores that are used to prognosticate potential complications.This study evaluates the utility of surgical Apgar score (SAS) as a tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients post general surgical procedures.The study cohort comprised of 400 patients aged between 15 to 75 years, and prospectively undergoing emergency or elective general surgery. SAS of patients were extracted from the anesthesiologist’s records on estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate and lowest mean arterial pressure. Post-operative outcomes such as major complications and mortality within 30 days of surgery were monitored.Out of the 297 elective procedures, 22 (7.41%) cases had major complications. While among those undergoing emergency surgeries (103), 38 (36.86%) patients developed major complications. The odds of developing major complications in patients with the high-risk SAS scores (31; 51.67%) was 5.42 (CI: 3.03–9.70) times greater than in patients with low-risk SAS scores (29; 48.33%). The odds of expiring after a general surgery was 11.92 times higher in high-risk patients (9; 75%) when contrasted with low-risk patients (3; 25%). The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting major complications is 51.67% and 83.53%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting mortality are 75% and 79.9%, respectively.SAS serves as a simple and dependable tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures under anesthesia other than local, requiring intensive perioperative monitoring.","PeriodicalId":38569,"journal":{"name":"Polish Annals of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of the surgical Apgar score in predicting morbidity and mortality: A prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Harsha A. Huliyappa, Sreevathsa Ramachar\",\"doi\":\"10.29089/paom/137489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optimization of postoperative care is often contingent upon the risk stratification tools such as surgical scores that are used to prognosticate potential complications.This study evaluates the utility of surgical Apgar score (SAS) as a tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients post general surgical procedures.The study cohort comprised of 400 patients aged between 15 to 75 years, and prospectively undergoing emergency or elective general surgery. SAS of patients were extracted from the anesthesiologist’s records on estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate and lowest mean arterial pressure. Post-operative outcomes such as major complications and mortality within 30 days of surgery were monitored.Out of the 297 elective procedures, 22 (7.41%) cases had major complications. While among those undergoing emergency surgeries (103), 38 (36.86%) patients developed major complications. The odds of developing major complications in patients with the high-risk SAS scores (31; 51.67%) was 5.42 (CI: 3.03–9.70) times greater than in patients with low-risk SAS scores (29; 48.33%). The odds of expiring after a general surgery was 11.92 times higher in high-risk patients (9; 75%) when contrasted with low-risk patients (3; 25%). The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting major complications is 51.67% and 83.53%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting mortality are 75% and 79.9%, respectively.SAS serves as a simple and dependable tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures under anesthesia other than local, requiring intensive perioperative monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Annals of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Annals of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29089/paom/137489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Annals of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29089/paom/137489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后护理的优化通常取决于风险分层工具,如用于预测潜在并发症的手术评分。本研究评估了外科Apgar评分(SAS)作为预测普通外科手术后患者发病率和30天死亡率的工具的效用。该研究队列由400名年龄在15至75岁之间的患者组成,他们前瞻性地接受紧急或选择性普通外科手术。从麻醉师关于估计失血量、最低心率和最低平均动脉压的记录中提取患者的SAS。监测术后结果,如术后30天内的主要并发症和死亡率。在297例择期手术中,22例(7.41%)有严重并发症。在接受紧急手术的患者中(103人),有38名(36.86%)患者出现了严重并发症。高危SAS评分患者发生重大并发症的几率(31;51.67%)是低风险SAS评分患者(29;48.33%)的5.42倍(CI:3.03-9.70)。高危患者(9;75%)在普通手术后死亡的几率是低风险患者(3;25%)的11.92倍。SAS预测主要并发症的敏感性和特异性分别为51.67%和83.53%。SAS预测死亡率的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和79.9%。SAS是一种简单可靠的工具,可以预测在非局部麻醉下接受手术的患者的发病率和30天死亡率,需要加强围手术期监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of the surgical Apgar score in predicting morbidity and mortality: A prospective study
Optimization of postoperative care is often contingent upon the risk stratification tools such as surgical scores that are used to prognosticate potential complications.This study evaluates the utility of surgical Apgar score (SAS) as a tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients post general surgical procedures.The study cohort comprised of 400 patients aged between 15 to 75 years, and prospectively undergoing emergency or elective general surgery. SAS of patients were extracted from the anesthesiologist’s records on estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate and lowest mean arterial pressure. Post-operative outcomes such as major complications and mortality within 30 days of surgery were monitored.Out of the 297 elective procedures, 22 (7.41%) cases had major complications. While among those undergoing emergency surgeries (103), 38 (36.86%) patients developed major complications. The odds of developing major complications in patients with the high-risk SAS scores (31; 51.67%) was 5.42 (CI: 3.03–9.70) times greater than in patients with low-risk SAS scores (29; 48.33%). The odds of expiring after a general surgery was 11.92 times higher in high-risk patients (9; 75%) when contrasted with low-risk patients (3; 25%). The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting major complications is 51.67% and 83.53%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SAS in predicting mortality are 75% and 79.9%, respectively.SAS serves as a simple and dependable tool to predict morbidity and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgical procedures under anesthesia other than local, requiring intensive perioperative monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Annals of Medicine
Polish Annals of Medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信