贵宾到饭店老板?Stefan泽朋费尔德在西柏林的工作伙伴"沃利,2021 "Pp工作. 430 .Hardback€39.00 .书:978-3835350229 .

IF 0.4 3区 人文科学 Q1 HISTORY
Lauren K Stokes
{"title":"贵宾到饭店老板?Stefan泽朋费尔德在西柏林的工作伙伴\"沃利,2021 \"Pp工作. 430 .Hardback€39.00 .书:978-3835350229 .","authors":"Lauren K Stokes","doi":"10.1017/s0008938923000353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"strong racial stock. The latter charge ironically came partly from their reading of Arendt’s careless comments concerning Jewish councils. And Arab writers agreed that Israel exploited the Holocaust in order to hide its own crimes. These charges have their true believers and scholarly apologists to this day. Indeed, Michael Berkowitz’s essay in the volume debunks, yet again, the notion of a Zionist-Nazi alliance, an idea fueled in part by Eichmann’s insistence at trial that he admired Zionist aims and tried to further them. Thomas Pegelow Kaplan’s essay on 1960s student movements in West Germany and the U.S. might be the volume’s most open-ended. For the New Left, which misread Arendt’s thesis of Eichmann’s unthinking banality, “Eichmann” became the architype for the postcolonial perpetrator of racist and imperialist crimes ranging from the American South to Vietnam – the ubiquitous petit bourgeois servant of atrocity reborn in the bureaucracy. Problems with this assessment were many. One was that this universalization of “Eichmann” was never applied to communist societies where the apparatchiks were more in keeping with Arendt’s conceptions of totalitarianism. Another was that, for protest movements, Eichmann’s crimes were divorced from their essential core, namely the destruction of Europe’s Jews. Stripped of their specificity, they could be applied willy-nilly, including against Israel, an expanding bête noire of the global left. Together, the essays in Wittmann’s fine volume reflect the long reach of the Eichmann trial. Yet ironically, they also reflect the persistent reach of Arendt’s reading of the trial, for Arendt’s assessment, flawed though it was, influenced and still influences how the Jerusalem proceedings were understood in everything from international law to postmodern assessments of power. In that sense, the essays reflect that Eichmann’s ashes, though scattered at sea after his execution in 1962, were scatted further than the Israelis ever intended. His trial is truly one without end.","PeriodicalId":45053,"journal":{"name":"Central European History","volume":"56 1","pages":"344 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vom Gast zum Gastwirt? Türkische Arbeitswelten in West-Berlin By Stefan Zeppenfeld. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2021. Pp. 430. Hardback €39.00. ISBN: 978-3835350229.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren K Stokes\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0008938923000353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"strong racial stock. The latter charge ironically came partly from their reading of Arendt’s careless comments concerning Jewish councils. And Arab writers agreed that Israel exploited the Holocaust in order to hide its own crimes. These charges have their true believers and scholarly apologists to this day. Indeed, Michael Berkowitz’s essay in the volume debunks, yet again, the notion of a Zionist-Nazi alliance, an idea fueled in part by Eichmann’s insistence at trial that he admired Zionist aims and tried to further them. Thomas Pegelow Kaplan’s essay on 1960s student movements in West Germany and the U.S. might be the volume’s most open-ended. For the New Left, which misread Arendt’s thesis of Eichmann’s unthinking banality, “Eichmann” became the architype for the postcolonial perpetrator of racist and imperialist crimes ranging from the American South to Vietnam – the ubiquitous petit bourgeois servant of atrocity reborn in the bureaucracy. Problems with this assessment were many. One was that this universalization of “Eichmann” was never applied to communist societies where the apparatchiks were more in keeping with Arendt’s conceptions of totalitarianism. Another was that, for protest movements, Eichmann’s crimes were divorced from their essential core, namely the destruction of Europe’s Jews. Stripped of their specificity, they could be applied willy-nilly, including against Israel, an expanding bête noire of the global left. Together, the essays in Wittmann’s fine volume reflect the long reach of the Eichmann trial. Yet ironically, they also reflect the persistent reach of Arendt’s reading of the trial, for Arendt’s assessment, flawed though it was, influenced and still influences how the Jerusalem proceedings were understood in everything from international law to postmodern assessments of power. In that sense, the essays reflect that Eichmann’s ashes, though scattered at sea after his execution in 1962, were scatted further than the Israelis ever intended. His trial is truly one without end.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European History\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"344 - 346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938923000353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"人文科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938923000353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"人文科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强烈的种族倾向。具有讽刺意味的是,后一项指控部分来自于他们对阿伦特关于犹太议会的草率评论的解读。阿拉伯作家一致认为,以色列利用大屠杀来掩盖自己的罪行。直到今天,这些指控都有其真正的信徒和学术辩护者。事实上,Michael Berkowitz在这本书中的文章再次揭穿了犹太复国主义-纳粹联盟的概念,艾希曼在审判中坚持他钦佩犹太复国主义的目标,并试图推动这些目标,这在一定程度上推动了这一想法。托马斯·佩格洛·卡普兰(Thomas Pegelow Kaplan)关于20世纪60年代西德和美国学生运动的文章可能是该卷最开放的一篇。对于误读了阿伦特关于艾希曼不假思索的平庸的论点的新左派来说,“艾希曼”成为了从美国南部到越南等种族主义和帝国主义罪行的后殖民罪犯的原型——在官僚机构中重生的无处不在的小资产阶级暴行仆人。这种评估存在许多问题。一个是,“艾希曼”的普遍性从未适用于共产主义社会,在那里,官员们更符合阿伦特的极权主义概念。另一个原因是,对于抗议运动来说,艾希曼的罪行脱离了其基本核心,即摧毁欧洲犹太人。除去它们的特殊性,它们可以随意应用,包括针对以色列,这是全球左派不断扩大的仇恨。总之,Wittmann精品卷中的文章反映了艾希曼审判的深远影响。然而,具有讽刺意味的是,它们也反映了阿伦特对审判的持续解读,因为阿伦特的评估虽然有缺陷,但影响并仍然影响着从国际法到后现代权力评估等各个方面对耶路撒冷诉讼程序的理解。从这个意义上说,这些文章反映了艾希曼的骨灰,尽管在1962年被处决后散落在海上,但被没收的程度比以色列人预想的要远。对他的审判真是没完没了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vom Gast zum Gastwirt? Türkische Arbeitswelten in West-Berlin By Stefan Zeppenfeld. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2021. Pp. 430. Hardback €39.00. ISBN: 978-3835350229.
strong racial stock. The latter charge ironically came partly from their reading of Arendt’s careless comments concerning Jewish councils. And Arab writers agreed that Israel exploited the Holocaust in order to hide its own crimes. These charges have their true believers and scholarly apologists to this day. Indeed, Michael Berkowitz’s essay in the volume debunks, yet again, the notion of a Zionist-Nazi alliance, an idea fueled in part by Eichmann’s insistence at trial that he admired Zionist aims and tried to further them. Thomas Pegelow Kaplan’s essay on 1960s student movements in West Germany and the U.S. might be the volume’s most open-ended. For the New Left, which misread Arendt’s thesis of Eichmann’s unthinking banality, “Eichmann” became the architype for the postcolonial perpetrator of racist and imperialist crimes ranging from the American South to Vietnam – the ubiquitous petit bourgeois servant of atrocity reborn in the bureaucracy. Problems with this assessment were many. One was that this universalization of “Eichmann” was never applied to communist societies where the apparatchiks were more in keeping with Arendt’s conceptions of totalitarianism. Another was that, for protest movements, Eichmann’s crimes were divorced from their essential core, namely the destruction of Europe’s Jews. Stripped of their specificity, they could be applied willy-nilly, including against Israel, an expanding bête noire of the global left. Together, the essays in Wittmann’s fine volume reflect the long reach of the Eichmann trial. Yet ironically, they also reflect the persistent reach of Arendt’s reading of the trial, for Arendt’s assessment, flawed though it was, influenced and still influences how the Jerusalem proceedings were understood in everything from international law to postmodern assessments of power. In that sense, the essays reflect that Eichmann’s ashes, though scattered at sea after his execution in 1962, were scatted further than the Israelis ever intended. His trial is truly one without end.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Central European History offers articles, review essays, and book reviews that range widely through the history of Germany, Austria, and other German-speaking regions of Central Europe from the medieval era to the present. All topics and approaches to history are welcome, whether cultural, social, political, diplomatic, intellectual, economic, and military history, as well as historiography and methodology. Contributions that treat new fields, such as post-1945 and post-1989 history, maturing fields such as gender history, and less-represented fields such as medieval history and the history of the Habsburg lands are especially desired. The journal thus aims to be the primary venue for scholarly exchange and debate among scholars of the history of Central Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信