社区内部人员和外部人员会停留多久?某城市学区数学教师的培养与保留

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrew M. Brantlinger, Ashley A. Grant, Laurel Cooley
{"title":"社区内部人员和外部人员会停留多久?某城市学区数学教师的培养与保留","authors":"Andrew M. Brantlinger, Ashley A. Grant, Laurel Cooley","doi":"10.1086/725587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Many US school districts currently face teacher-retention issues, raising questions about which new teachers might remain long term in district schools. Positing that a teacher’s local ties matter, this quantitative analysis was designed to compare the long-term retention of community-based teachers to community outsiders in the school district that recruited them and subsidized their initial training. Research Methods/Approach: To understand the extent to which individual preparation approaches might distribute different retention benefits to different teacher subgroups, the study examined teacher preparation as an interactive system. Drawing on administrative data from New York City Public Schools and project survey data, the study used logistic regression to model the 3-, 5-, and 8-year retention of 617 secondary mathematics teachers who entered teaching through a high-profile alternative teacher-certification program. Findings: Community insiders—defined in this study as the graduates of New York City high schools—had markedly and significantly estimated higher odds of district retention than that of community outsiders at all three points in time. Black community insiders who entered teaching with prior career experience were shown to have particularly high odds of retention in the district. Implications: The results indicate that the recruitment and development of community-based teachers, and particularly those who are Black career changers, promise to improve retention in district schools. They also support the thesis that retention and other program-level outcomes are the product of interactions between certain types of teachers working in particular (e.g., highly racially segregated) schools and the initial training they receive in teacher-certification programs.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"129 1","pages":"481 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Long Do Community Insiders and Outsiders Stay? Mathematics Teacher Preparation and Retention in an Urban School District\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. Brantlinger, Ashley A. Grant, Laurel Cooley\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Many US school districts currently face teacher-retention issues, raising questions about which new teachers might remain long term in district schools. Positing that a teacher’s local ties matter, this quantitative analysis was designed to compare the long-term retention of community-based teachers to community outsiders in the school district that recruited them and subsidized their initial training. Research Methods/Approach: To understand the extent to which individual preparation approaches might distribute different retention benefits to different teacher subgroups, the study examined teacher preparation as an interactive system. Drawing on administrative data from New York City Public Schools and project survey data, the study used logistic regression to model the 3-, 5-, and 8-year retention of 617 secondary mathematics teachers who entered teaching through a high-profile alternative teacher-certification program. Findings: Community insiders—defined in this study as the graduates of New York City high schools—had markedly and significantly estimated higher odds of district retention than that of community outsiders at all three points in time. Black community insiders who entered teaching with prior career experience were shown to have particularly high odds of retention in the district. Implications: The results indicate that the recruitment and development of community-based teachers, and particularly those who are Black career changers, promise to improve retention in district schools. They also support the thesis that retention and other program-level outcomes are the product of interactions between certain types of teachers working in particular (e.g., highly racially segregated) schools and the initial training they receive in teacher-certification programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"481 - 512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725587\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:许多美国学区目前面临教师保留问题,提出了哪些新教师可能长期留在学区学校的问题。假设教师的当地关系很重要,这个定量分析的目的是比较长期保留社区教师和社区外的人在学区招募他们并补贴他们的初始培训。研究方法/途径:为了了解个别备考方法在多大程度上可能会给不同的教师群体带来不同的保留效益,本研究将教师备考作为一个互动系统进行了考察。利用纽约市公立学校的行政数据和项目调查数据,该研究使用逻辑回归对617名中学数学教师进行了3年、5年和8年的留任建模,这些教师都是通过一个备受瞩目的替代教师认证计划进入教学的。研究发现:社区圈内人——在本研究中定义为纽约市高中毕业生——在所有三个时间点上都明显且显著地估计出比社区圈外人更高的留校率。有先前工作经验的黑人社区内部人士在该地区的保留率特别高。启示:结果表明,社区教师的招聘和发展,特别是那些改变职业的黑人教师,有望提高地区学校的留用率。他们还支持这样一种观点,即保留和其他项目水平的结果是特定类型的教师在特定学校(例如,高度种族隔离的学校)工作与他们在教师认证项目中接受的初步培训之间相互作用的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Long Do Community Insiders and Outsiders Stay? Mathematics Teacher Preparation and Retention in an Urban School District
Purpose: Many US school districts currently face teacher-retention issues, raising questions about which new teachers might remain long term in district schools. Positing that a teacher’s local ties matter, this quantitative analysis was designed to compare the long-term retention of community-based teachers to community outsiders in the school district that recruited them and subsidized their initial training. Research Methods/Approach: To understand the extent to which individual preparation approaches might distribute different retention benefits to different teacher subgroups, the study examined teacher preparation as an interactive system. Drawing on administrative data from New York City Public Schools and project survey data, the study used logistic regression to model the 3-, 5-, and 8-year retention of 617 secondary mathematics teachers who entered teaching through a high-profile alternative teacher-certification program. Findings: Community insiders—defined in this study as the graduates of New York City high schools—had markedly and significantly estimated higher odds of district retention than that of community outsiders at all three points in time. Black community insiders who entered teaching with prior career experience were shown to have particularly high odds of retention in the district. Implications: The results indicate that the recruitment and development of community-based teachers, and particularly those who are Black career changers, promise to improve retention in district schools. They also support the thesis that retention and other program-level outcomes are the product of interactions between certain types of teachers working in particular (e.g., highly racially segregated) schools and the initial training they receive in teacher-certification programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信