单技能数学CBM的精度:群体与个人管理

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jillian M. Dawes, Benjamin G. Solomon, Daniel F. McCleary, Cutler Ruby, Brian C. Poncy
{"title":"单技能数学CBM的精度:群体与个人管理","authors":"Jillian M. Dawes, Benjamin G. Solomon, Daniel F. McCleary, Cutler Ruby, Brian C. Poncy","doi":"10.1177/15345084211035055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current availability of research examining the precision of single-skill mathematics (SSM) curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) for progress monitoring is limited. Given the observed variance in administration conditions across current practice and research use, we examined potential differences between student responding and precision of slope when SSM-CBMs were administered individually and in group (classroom) conditions. No differences in student performance or measure precision were observed between conditions, indicating flexibility in the practical and research use of SSM-CBMs across administration conditions. In addition, findings contributed to the literature examining the stability of SSM-CBMs slopes of progress when used for instructional decision-making. Implications for the administration and interpretation of SSM-CBMs in practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"47 1","pages":"170 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15345084211035055","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision of Single-Skill Mathematics CBM: Group Versus Individual Administration\",\"authors\":\"Jillian M. Dawes, Benjamin G. Solomon, Daniel F. McCleary, Cutler Ruby, Brian C. Poncy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15345084211035055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current availability of research examining the precision of single-skill mathematics (SSM) curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) for progress monitoring is limited. Given the observed variance in administration conditions across current practice and research use, we examined potential differences between student responding and precision of slope when SSM-CBMs were administered individually and in group (classroom) conditions. No differences in student performance or measure precision were observed between conditions, indicating flexibility in the practical and research use of SSM-CBMs across administration conditions. In addition, findings contributed to the literature examining the stability of SSM-CBMs slopes of progress when used for instructional decision-making. Implications for the administration and interpretation of SSM-CBMs in practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15345084211035055\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084211035055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084211035055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,对基于单技能数学(SSM)课程的测量(CBM)精度进行研究的进展监测的可用性有限。鉴于当前实践和研究使用中观察到的管理条件的差异,我们研究了当单独和在小组(课堂)条件下管理SSM CBM时,学生反应和斜率精度之间的潜在差异。不同条件下的学生表现或测量精度没有差异,这表明在不同管理条件下,SSM CBM的实践和研究使用具有灵活性。此外,研究结果有助于研究SSM CBM在用于教学决策时的进步斜率的稳定性。讨论了SSM CBM在实践中的管理和解释意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Precision of Single-Skill Mathematics CBM: Group Versus Individual Administration
The current availability of research examining the precision of single-skill mathematics (SSM) curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) for progress monitoring is limited. Given the observed variance in administration conditions across current practice and research use, we examined potential differences between student responding and precision of slope when SSM-CBMs were administered individually and in group (classroom) conditions. No differences in student performance or measure precision were observed between conditions, indicating flexibility in the practical and research use of SSM-CBMs across administration conditions. In addition, findings contributed to the literature examining the stability of SSM-CBMs slopes of progress when used for instructional decision-making. Implications for the administration and interpretation of SSM-CBMs in practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信