{"title":"半固态锂离子液流电池电解液及液浆燃烧特性实验研究","authors":"Yuhang Hu, Siyuan Cheng, Pengjie Liu, Jiaqing Zhang, Qiangling Duan, Huahua Xiao, Jinhua Sun, Qingsong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Semi-solid lithium-ion flow battery (SSLFB) is a promising candidate in the field of large-scale energy storage. However, as a key component of SSLFB, the slurry presents a great fire hazard due to the extremely flammable electrolyte content in the slurry as high as 70 wt%–95 wt%. To evaluate the fire risk of SSFLB, the combustion experiments of electrolyte and slurry were conducted using cone calorimeter, and the critical fire parameters such as heat release rate (HRR), mass loss rate (MLR), and gas production were analyzed. This study firstly compared the combustion characteristics of electrolytes with the addition of different lithium salts (LiPF<sub>6</sub> and LiTFSI). The results showed that the peak HRR (pHRR) and peak MLR (pMLR) of LiTFSI-based electrolyte were reduced by 30.3% and 33.2%, respectively, compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>-based electrolyte. Also, LiTFSI-based electrolyte possessed a relatively lower toxic hazard. Overall, LiTFSI could reduce the fire hazard of the electrolyte compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>. Then, the combustion behaviour of slurries containing different electrode materials (Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>, LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, LiFePO<sub>4</sub>, and Graphite) was investigated. It was observed that the splashing occurred in the early stage combustion of slurries. The splashing of S-LTO and S-LFP was relatively violent, while only sporadic splashing occurred for S-NCM and S-graphite. Based on the pHRR and pMLR test results, the order of fire risk of the four slurries is determined as S-LTO > S-LFP > S-NCM > S-Graphite. The pHRR and pMLR of slurries other than S-LTO are lower than that of electrolyte, thus their fire risk is lower than electrolyte. The results of this study can provide a reference for the fire hazard evaluation and safety improvement of the SSFLB system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"59 3","pages":"1199 - 1220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Electrolytes and Slurries for Semi-Solid Lithium-ion Flow Battery\",\"authors\":\"Yuhang Hu, Siyuan Cheng, Pengjie Liu, Jiaqing Zhang, Qiangling Duan, Huahua Xiao, Jinhua Sun, Qingsong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Semi-solid lithium-ion flow battery (SSLFB) is a promising candidate in the field of large-scale energy storage. However, as a key component of SSLFB, the slurry presents a great fire hazard due to the extremely flammable electrolyte content in the slurry as high as 70 wt%–95 wt%. To evaluate the fire risk of SSFLB, the combustion experiments of electrolyte and slurry were conducted using cone calorimeter, and the critical fire parameters such as heat release rate (HRR), mass loss rate (MLR), and gas production were analyzed. This study firstly compared the combustion characteristics of electrolytes with the addition of different lithium salts (LiPF<sub>6</sub> and LiTFSI). The results showed that the peak HRR (pHRR) and peak MLR (pMLR) of LiTFSI-based electrolyte were reduced by 30.3% and 33.2%, respectively, compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>-based electrolyte. Also, LiTFSI-based electrolyte possessed a relatively lower toxic hazard. Overall, LiTFSI could reduce the fire hazard of the electrolyte compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>. Then, the combustion behaviour of slurries containing different electrode materials (Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>, LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, LiFePO<sub>4</sub>, and Graphite) was investigated. It was observed that the splashing occurred in the early stage combustion of slurries. The splashing of S-LTO and S-LFP was relatively violent, while only sporadic splashing occurred for S-NCM and S-graphite. Based on the pHRR and pMLR test results, the order of fire risk of the four slurries is determined as S-LTO > S-LFP > S-NCM > S-Graphite. The pHRR and pMLR of slurries other than S-LTO are lower than that of electrolyte, thus their fire risk is lower than electrolyte. The results of this study can provide a reference for the fire hazard evaluation and safety improvement of the SSFLB system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Technology\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"1199 - 1220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Electrolytes and Slurries for Semi-Solid Lithium-ion Flow Battery
Semi-solid lithium-ion flow battery (SSLFB) is a promising candidate in the field of large-scale energy storage. However, as a key component of SSLFB, the slurry presents a great fire hazard due to the extremely flammable electrolyte content in the slurry as high as 70 wt%–95 wt%. To evaluate the fire risk of SSFLB, the combustion experiments of electrolyte and slurry were conducted using cone calorimeter, and the critical fire parameters such as heat release rate (HRR), mass loss rate (MLR), and gas production were analyzed. This study firstly compared the combustion characteristics of electrolytes with the addition of different lithium salts (LiPF6 and LiTFSI). The results showed that the peak HRR (pHRR) and peak MLR (pMLR) of LiTFSI-based electrolyte were reduced by 30.3% and 33.2%, respectively, compared with LiPF6-based electrolyte. Also, LiTFSI-based electrolyte possessed a relatively lower toxic hazard. Overall, LiTFSI could reduce the fire hazard of the electrolyte compared with LiPF6. Then, the combustion behaviour of slurries containing different electrode materials (Li4Ti5O12, LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, LiFePO4, and Graphite) was investigated. It was observed that the splashing occurred in the early stage combustion of slurries. The splashing of S-LTO and S-LFP was relatively violent, while only sporadic splashing occurred for S-NCM and S-graphite. Based on the pHRR and pMLR test results, the order of fire risk of the four slurries is determined as S-LTO > S-LFP > S-NCM > S-Graphite. The pHRR and pMLR of slurries other than S-LTO are lower than that of electrolyte, thus their fire risk is lower than electrolyte. The results of this study can provide a reference for the fire hazard evaluation and safety improvement of the SSFLB system.
期刊介绍:
Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis.
The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large.
It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.