半固态锂离子液流电池电解液及液浆燃烧特性实验研究

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yuhang Hu, Siyuan Cheng, Pengjie Liu, Jiaqing Zhang, Qiangling Duan, Huahua Xiao, Jinhua Sun, Qingsong Wang
{"title":"半固态锂离子液流电池电解液及液浆燃烧特性实验研究","authors":"Yuhang Hu,&nbsp;Siyuan Cheng,&nbsp;Pengjie Liu,&nbsp;Jiaqing Zhang,&nbsp;Qiangling Duan,&nbsp;Huahua Xiao,&nbsp;Jinhua Sun,&nbsp;Qingsong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Semi-solid lithium-ion flow battery (SSLFB) is a promising candidate in the field of large-scale energy storage. However, as a key component of SSLFB, the slurry presents a great fire hazard due to the extremely flammable electrolyte content in the slurry as high as 70 wt%–95 wt%. To evaluate the fire risk of SSFLB, the combustion experiments of electrolyte and slurry were conducted using cone calorimeter, and the critical fire parameters such as heat release rate (HRR), mass loss rate (MLR), and gas production were analyzed. This study firstly compared the combustion characteristics of electrolytes with the addition of different lithium salts (LiPF<sub>6</sub> and LiTFSI). The results showed that the peak HRR (pHRR) and peak MLR (pMLR) of LiTFSI-based electrolyte were reduced by 30.3% and 33.2%, respectively, compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>-based electrolyte. Also, LiTFSI-based electrolyte possessed a relatively lower toxic hazard. Overall, LiTFSI could reduce the fire hazard of the electrolyte compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>. Then, the combustion behaviour of slurries containing different electrode materials (Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>, LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, LiFePO<sub>4</sub>, and Graphite) was investigated. It was observed that the splashing occurred in the early stage combustion of slurries. The splashing of S-LTO and S-LFP was relatively violent, while only sporadic splashing occurred for S-NCM and S-graphite. Based on the pHRR and pMLR test results, the order of fire risk of the four slurries is determined as S-LTO &gt; S-LFP &gt; S-NCM &gt; S-Graphite. The pHRR and pMLR of slurries other than S-LTO are lower than that of electrolyte, thus their fire risk is lower than electrolyte. The results of this study can provide a reference for the fire hazard evaluation and safety improvement of the SSFLB system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"59 3","pages":"1199 - 1220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Electrolytes and Slurries for Semi-Solid Lithium-ion Flow Battery\",\"authors\":\"Yuhang Hu,&nbsp;Siyuan Cheng,&nbsp;Pengjie Liu,&nbsp;Jiaqing Zhang,&nbsp;Qiangling Duan,&nbsp;Huahua Xiao,&nbsp;Jinhua Sun,&nbsp;Qingsong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Semi-solid lithium-ion flow battery (SSLFB) is a promising candidate in the field of large-scale energy storage. However, as a key component of SSLFB, the slurry presents a great fire hazard due to the extremely flammable electrolyte content in the slurry as high as 70 wt%–95 wt%. To evaluate the fire risk of SSFLB, the combustion experiments of electrolyte and slurry were conducted using cone calorimeter, and the critical fire parameters such as heat release rate (HRR), mass loss rate (MLR), and gas production were analyzed. This study firstly compared the combustion characteristics of electrolytes with the addition of different lithium salts (LiPF<sub>6</sub> and LiTFSI). The results showed that the peak HRR (pHRR) and peak MLR (pMLR) of LiTFSI-based electrolyte were reduced by 30.3% and 33.2%, respectively, compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>-based electrolyte. Also, LiTFSI-based electrolyte possessed a relatively lower toxic hazard. Overall, LiTFSI could reduce the fire hazard of the electrolyte compared with LiPF<sub>6</sub>. Then, the combustion behaviour of slurries containing different electrode materials (Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub>, LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, LiFePO<sub>4</sub>, and Graphite) was investigated. It was observed that the splashing occurred in the early stage combustion of slurries. The splashing of S-LTO and S-LFP was relatively violent, while only sporadic splashing occurred for S-NCM and S-graphite. Based on the pHRR and pMLR test results, the order of fire risk of the four slurries is determined as S-LTO &gt; S-LFP &gt; S-NCM &gt; S-Graphite. The pHRR and pMLR of slurries other than S-LTO are lower than that of electrolyte, thus their fire risk is lower than electrolyte. The results of this study can provide a reference for the fire hazard evaluation and safety improvement of the SSFLB system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Technology\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"1199 - 1220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-023-01384-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半固态锂离子液流电池(SSLFB)在大规模储能领域具有广阔的应用前景。然而,作为SSLFB的关键组成部分,由于浆液中极易燃的电解质含量高达70 wt% -95 wt%,因此浆液具有很大的火灾危险。为了评估SSFLB的火灾危险性,采用锥形量热计对电解液和料浆进行了燃烧实验,并对其放热率(HRR)、质量损失率(MLR)和产气量等关键火灾参数进行了分析。本研究首先比较了添加不同锂盐(LiPF6和LiTFSI)时电解质的燃烧特性。结果表明,与lipf6基电解质相比,litfsi基电解质的峰HRR (pHRR)和峰MLR (pMLR)分别降低了30.3%和33.2%。此外,基于litfsi的电解质具有相对较低的毒性危害。总体而言,与LiPF6相比,LiTFSI可以降低电解质的火灾危险。然后,研究了不同电极材料(Li4Ti5O12、LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2、LiFePO4和石墨)的浆料的燃烧行为。结果表明,飞溅现象发生在浆料燃烧初期。S-LTO和S-LFP的溅射相对剧烈,而S-NCM和s -石墨仅发生零星溅射。根据pHRR和pMLR试验结果,确定4种浆料的火灾危险等级顺序为:S-LTO > S-LFP > S-NCM > s -石墨。除S-LTO以外的浆料的pHRR和pMLR均低于电解质,因此其火灾危险性低于电解质。研究结果可为SSFLB系统的火灾危险性评价和安全改进提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Electrolytes and Slurries for Semi-Solid Lithium-ion Flow Battery

Semi-solid lithium-ion flow battery (SSLFB) is a promising candidate in the field of large-scale energy storage. However, as a key component of SSLFB, the slurry presents a great fire hazard due to the extremely flammable electrolyte content in the slurry as high as 70 wt%–95 wt%. To evaluate the fire risk of SSFLB, the combustion experiments of electrolyte and slurry were conducted using cone calorimeter, and the critical fire parameters such as heat release rate (HRR), mass loss rate (MLR), and gas production were analyzed. This study firstly compared the combustion characteristics of electrolytes with the addition of different lithium salts (LiPF6 and LiTFSI). The results showed that the peak HRR (pHRR) and peak MLR (pMLR) of LiTFSI-based electrolyte were reduced by 30.3% and 33.2%, respectively, compared with LiPF6-based electrolyte. Also, LiTFSI-based electrolyte possessed a relatively lower toxic hazard. Overall, LiTFSI could reduce the fire hazard of the electrolyte compared with LiPF6. Then, the combustion behaviour of slurries containing different electrode materials (Li4Ti5O12, LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, LiFePO4, and Graphite) was investigated. It was observed that the splashing occurred in the early stage combustion of slurries. The splashing of S-LTO and S-LFP was relatively violent, while only sporadic splashing occurred for S-NCM and S-graphite. Based on the pHRR and pMLR test results, the order of fire risk of the four slurries is determined as S-LTO > S-LFP > S-NCM > S-Graphite. The pHRR and pMLR of slurries other than S-LTO are lower than that of electrolyte, thus their fire risk is lower than electrolyte. The results of this study can provide a reference for the fire hazard evaluation and safety improvement of the SSFLB system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信