从利益相关者的参与中产生环境信息述评

Josh Rosa
{"title":"从利益相关者的参与中产生环境信息述评","authors":"Josh Rosa","doi":"10.15365/cate.2023.160106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides practice-informed advice, guided by and responsive to theory, for policymakers who seek to improve their environmental policies by generating their own informational value from their interactions with stakeholders. First, the article explains a self-reinforcing opaqueness of conventional environmental policymaking and how this opaqueness disproportionately and cumulatively impacts underrepresented communities. Drawing from the literature of social ecology, political economy, and political methodology, the article adumbrates opaqueness’ contributions to environmental injustice and identifies potential benefits of a more informative approach to stakeholder engagement. Next, the article explains specific methods that policymakers can use to convert stakeholder input into greater awareness of the costs, benefits, risks, and tradeoffs presented by a given environmental policymaking. By conducting stakeholder engagement as an interactive and investigative pursuit, oriented toward underrepresented constituencies as well as policymakers’ own problem statement, policymakers can better inform their policies while also improving relationships with the parties those policies affect.","PeriodicalId":89339,"journal":{"name":"Cities and the environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on Producing Environmental Information from Stakeholder Engagement\",\"authors\":\"Josh Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.15365/cate.2023.160106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides practice-informed advice, guided by and responsive to theory, for policymakers who seek to improve their environmental policies by generating their own informational value from their interactions with stakeholders. First, the article explains a self-reinforcing opaqueness of conventional environmental policymaking and how this opaqueness disproportionately and cumulatively impacts underrepresented communities. Drawing from the literature of social ecology, political economy, and political methodology, the article adumbrates opaqueness’ contributions to environmental injustice and identifies potential benefits of a more informative approach to stakeholder engagement. Next, the article explains specific methods that policymakers can use to convert stakeholder input into greater awareness of the costs, benefits, risks, and tradeoffs presented by a given environmental policymaking. By conducting stakeholder engagement as an interactive and investigative pursuit, oriented toward underrepresented constituencies as well as policymakers’ own problem statement, policymakers can better inform their policies while also improving relationships with the parties those policies affect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities and the environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities and the environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15365/cate.2023.160106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities and the environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15365/cate.2023.160106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文为寻求通过与利益相关者的互动产生自己的信息价值来改善其环境政策的政策制定者提供了以实践为依据、以理论为指导和响应理论的建议。首先,本文解释了传统环境政策制定的自我强化的不透明性,以及这种不透明性如何不成比例地累积影响代表性不足的社区。从社会生态学、政治经济学和政治方法论的文献中,本文指出了不透明度对环境不公正的贡献,并确定了一种更有信息的方法对利益相关者参与的潜在好处。接下来,本文解释了决策者可以使用的具体方法,将利益相关者的投入转化为对特定环境政策制定所带来的成本、收益、风险和权衡的更大认识。通过将利益相关者参与作为一种互动和调查的追求,面向代表性不足的选区以及决策者自己的问题陈述,决策者可以更好地为他们的政策提供信息,同时也改善与这些政策所影响的各方的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commentary on Producing Environmental Information from Stakeholder Engagement
This article provides practice-informed advice, guided by and responsive to theory, for policymakers who seek to improve their environmental policies by generating their own informational value from their interactions with stakeholders. First, the article explains a self-reinforcing opaqueness of conventional environmental policymaking and how this opaqueness disproportionately and cumulatively impacts underrepresented communities. Drawing from the literature of social ecology, political economy, and political methodology, the article adumbrates opaqueness’ contributions to environmental injustice and identifies potential benefits of a more informative approach to stakeholder engagement. Next, the article explains specific methods that policymakers can use to convert stakeholder input into greater awareness of the costs, benefits, risks, and tradeoffs presented by a given environmental policymaking. By conducting stakeholder engagement as an interactive and investigative pursuit, oriented toward underrepresented constituencies as well as policymakers’ own problem statement, policymakers can better inform their policies while also improving relationships with the parties those policies affect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信