同质性和交叉性:对Ásta“我们赖以生存的类别”的回应

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1515/jso-2020-2004

K. Jenkins

{"title":"同质性和交叉性:对Ásta“我们赖以生存的类别”的回应","authors":"K. Jenkins","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-2004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The conferralist account of social properties that Ásta develops and defends in Categories We Live By is persuasive in many ways. Conferralism could however do better, by its own lights, at handling the phenomenon of intersectionality. This paper first suggests a friendly amendment to the schema for conferrals that Asta offers. This helps to explain the difficulty concerning intersectionality. Finally, the paper suggests a way of developing the conferralist account that would resolve this difficulty.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"5 1","pages":"261 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-2004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conferralism and Intersectionality: A Response to Ásta’s Categories We Live By\",\"authors\":\"K. Jenkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jso-2020-2004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The conferralist account of social properties that Ásta develops and defends in Categories We Live By is persuasive in many ways. Conferralism could however do better, by its own lights, at handling the phenomenon of intersectionality. This paper first suggests a friendly amendment to the schema for conferrals that Asta offers. This helps to explain the difficulty concerning intersectionality. Finally, the paper suggests a way of developing the conferralist account that would resolve this difficulty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Ontology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-2004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Ontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-2004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Ontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-2004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

Ásta在《我们赖以生存的范畴》一书中发展和捍卫的社会属性的归属论在很多方面都是有说服力的。然而，在处理交叉性现象方面，共治主义可以用它自己的方式做得更好。本文首先建议对亚洲提供的授权模式进行友好修正。这有助于解释关于交叉性的困难。最后，本文提出了一种可以解决这一困难的发展赋予主义解释的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Conferralism and Intersectionality: A Response to Ásta’s Categories We Live By

Abstract The conferralist account of social properties that Ásta develops and defends in Categories We Live By is persuasive in many ways. Conferralism could however do better, by its own lights, at handling the phenomenon of intersectionality. This paper first suggests a friendly amendment to the schema for conferrals that Asta offers. This helps to explain the difficulty concerning intersectionality. Finally, the paper suggests a way of developing the conferralist account that would resolve this difficulty.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Social Ontology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks