作为(再)愿景的研究:宣称口述历史是一种仅适用于美国的研究方法

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I. Jackson, Doris L. Watson, Claytee D White, M. Gallo
{"title":"作为(再)愿景的研究:宣称口述历史是一种仅适用于美国的研究方法","authors":"I. Jackson, Doris L. Watson, Claytee D White, M. Gallo","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2076827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides analysis of and commentary on the Indigenous roots of oral history. Drawing from our experience with our institutional review board determining that our work was not research, we review literature to engage in a (re)vision of oral history research while asserting the legitimacy of our research process. From this, we argue that a racially-just approach to scholarship must acknowledge and redress the racist past of the development of methodologies and methods including, but not limited to, oral history. We align our research with Indigenous traditions that not only shaped our methodology but guided our ability to create a community in which we each learned to better understand ourselves. Through our analysis and storying of ourselves, we posit that connecting research practices to our Indigenous roots becomes a tool for establishing racially-just approaches to scholarship with/as Black and Latinx peoples.","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research as (re)vision: laying claim to oral history as a just-us research methodology\",\"authors\":\"I. Jackson, Doris L. Watson, Claytee D White, M. Gallo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2076827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article provides analysis of and commentary on the Indigenous roots of oral history. Drawing from our experience with our institutional review board determining that our work was not research, we review literature to engage in a (re)vision of oral history research while asserting the legitimacy of our research process. From this, we argue that a racially-just approach to scholarship must acknowledge and redress the racist past of the development of methodologies and methods including, but not limited to, oral history. We align our research with Indigenous traditions that not only shaped our methodology but guided our ability to create a community in which we each learned to better understand ourselves. Through our analysis and storying of ourselves, we posit that connecting research practices to our Indigenous roots becomes a tool for establishing racially-just approaches to scholarship with/as Black and Latinx peoples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2076827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2076827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文对口述历史的本土根源进行了分析和评论。根据我们的经验,我们的机构审查委员会决定我们的工作不是研究,我们审查文献,以参与口述历史研究的(重新)愿景,同时主张我们的研究过程的合法性。由此,我们认为,一种种族公正的学术方法必须承认并纠正方法论和方法发展的种族主义过去,包括但不限于口述历史。我们将我们的研究与土著传统结合起来,这不仅塑造了我们的方法,而且指导了我们创建一个社区的能力,在这个社区中,我们每个人都学会了更好地了解自己。通过我们对自己的分析和故事,我们认为,将研究实践与我们的土著根源联系起来,将成为一种工具,可以为黑人和拉丁裔建立种族公正的学术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research as (re)vision: laying claim to oral history as a just-us research methodology
ABSTRACT This article provides analysis of and commentary on the Indigenous roots of oral history. Drawing from our experience with our institutional review board determining that our work was not research, we review literature to engage in a (re)vision of oral history research while asserting the legitimacy of our research process. From this, we argue that a racially-just approach to scholarship must acknowledge and redress the racist past of the development of methodologies and methods including, but not limited to, oral history. We align our research with Indigenous traditions that not only shaped our methodology but guided our ability to create a community in which we each learned to better understand ourselves. Through our analysis and storying of ourselves, we posit that connecting research practices to our Indigenous roots becomes a tool for establishing racially-just approaches to scholarship with/as Black and Latinx peoples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信