八卦和闲聊的社会学:一个元理论

Q3 Social Sciences
Ana Bilinović Rajačić, Aleksej Kišjuhas, M. Skoric
{"title":"八卦和闲聊的社会学:一个元理论","authors":"Ana Bilinović Rajačić, Aleksej Kišjuhas, M. Skoric","doi":"10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sociology of Gossip and Small Talk: A Metatheory. The present paper outlines a metatheory of gossip and small talk. While studies in the domain of the sociology of gossip are relatively sporadic, nonsystematic, and sparse, we find it possible to identify three key perspectives from which social scientists usually consider gossip. These three perspectives closely correspond to George Ritzer’s metatheory, as well as his differentiation between the social facts paradigm, the social definition paradigm, and the social behavior paradigm in sociology. Hence, in this paper, we also offer a brief overview of sociological research on the phenomenon of gossip, as well as studies conducted with the aim of answering the question of what people gossip about. Further, we thoroughly analyze the three abovementioned paradigms, which are here conceptualized as separate theoretical perspectives in the sociology of gossip. Concordantly, we argue the existence of functionalist, dramaturgical, and social exchange perspectives in the context of theoretical and empirical research on gossip in the field of sociology as well as other social sciences. Finally, we claim that gossip is one of the essential characteristics of social life and, as such, plays a crucial role in the most important social processes, such as the maintenance of group and social cohesion, the transfer of cultural values, sociocultural learning, the establishment of social control, the process of gaining social reputation and status, social exchange of information, and others, which is why we believe that gossip merits a more central position in sociological inquiries. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 6: 559-577) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23","PeriodicalId":35251,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sociology of Gossip and Small Talk: A Metatheory\",\"authors\":\"Ana Bilinović Rajačić, Aleksej Kišjuhas, M. Skoric\",\"doi\":\"10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Sociology of Gossip and Small Talk: A Metatheory. The present paper outlines a metatheory of gossip and small talk. While studies in the domain of the sociology of gossip are relatively sporadic, nonsystematic, and sparse, we find it possible to identify three key perspectives from which social scientists usually consider gossip. These three perspectives closely correspond to George Ritzer’s metatheory, as well as his differentiation between the social facts paradigm, the social definition paradigm, and the social behavior paradigm in sociology. Hence, in this paper, we also offer a brief overview of sociological research on the phenomenon of gossip, as well as studies conducted with the aim of answering the question of what people gossip about. Further, we thoroughly analyze the three abovementioned paradigms, which are here conceptualized as separate theoretical perspectives in the sociology of gossip. Concordantly, we argue the existence of functionalist, dramaturgical, and social exchange perspectives in the context of theoretical and empirical research on gossip in the field of sociology as well as other social sciences. Finally, we claim that gossip is one of the essential characteristics of social life and, as such, plays a crucial role in the most important social processes, such as the maintenance of group and social cohesion, the transfer of cultural values, sociocultural learning, the establishment of social control, the process of gaining social reputation and status, social exchange of information, and others, which is why we believe that gossip merits a more central position in sociological inquiries. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 6: 559-577) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23\",\"PeriodicalId\":35251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

八卦与闲聊的社会学:一种元理论。本文概述了八卦和闲聊的元理论。虽然八卦社会学领域的研究相对零散、非系统和稀疏,但我们发现有可能确定社会科学家通常从三个关键角度来考虑八卦。这三个视角与乔治·里泽的元理论以及他在社会学中对社会事实范式、社会定义范式和社会行为范式的区分密切相关。因此,在本文中,我们还简要概述了对八卦现象的社会学研究,以及旨在回答人们八卦的问题的研究。此外,我们深入分析了上述三种范式,它们在八卦社会学中被概念化为单独的理论视角。在社会学和其他社会科学领域对八卦的理论和实证研究中,我们一致认为功能主义、戏剧学和社会交换观点的存在。最后,我们认为八卦是社会生活的基本特征之一,因此在最重要的社会过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,如维护群体和社会凝聚力、文化价值观的传递、社会文化学习、建立社会控制、获得社会声誉和地位的过程、信息的社会交换,和其他人,这就是为什么我们认为八卦在社会学研究中应该占据更中心的地位。《社会学2020》,第52卷(第6期:559-577)https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Sociology of Gossip and Small Talk: A Metatheory
The Sociology of Gossip and Small Talk: A Metatheory. The present paper outlines a metatheory of gossip and small talk. While studies in the domain of the sociology of gossip are relatively sporadic, nonsystematic, and sparse, we find it possible to identify three key perspectives from which social scientists usually consider gossip. These three perspectives closely correspond to George Ritzer’s metatheory, as well as his differentiation between the social facts paradigm, the social definition paradigm, and the social behavior paradigm in sociology. Hence, in this paper, we also offer a brief overview of sociological research on the phenomenon of gossip, as well as studies conducted with the aim of answering the question of what people gossip about. Further, we thoroughly analyze the three abovementioned paradigms, which are here conceptualized as separate theoretical perspectives in the sociology of gossip. Concordantly, we argue the existence of functionalist, dramaturgical, and social exchange perspectives in the context of theoretical and empirical research on gossip in the field of sociology as well as other social sciences. Finally, we claim that gossip is one of the essential characteristics of social life and, as such, plays a crucial role in the most important social processes, such as the maintenance of group and social cohesion, the transfer of cultural values, sociocultural learning, the establishment of social control, the process of gaining social reputation and status, social exchange of information, and others, which is why we believe that gossip merits a more central position in sociological inquiries. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 6: 559-577) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.6.23
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信