沿海地区全球重力场模型的质量评估:以土耳其伊斯坦布尔的天文大地测量垂直偏转为例研究

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Müge Albayrak, Christian Hirt, Sébastien Guillaume, Kerem Halicioglu, M. Tevfik Özlüdemir, C. K. Shum
{"title":"沿海地区全球重力场模型的质量评估:以土耳其伊斯坦布尔的天文大地测量垂直偏转为例研究","authors":"Müge Albayrak,&nbsp;Christian Hirt,&nbsp;Sébastien Guillaume,&nbsp;Kerem Halicioglu,&nbsp;M. Tevfik Özlüdemir,&nbsp;C. K. Shum","doi":"10.1007/s11200-019-0591-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present the first high-precision astrogeodetic vertical deflection (VD) observations collected in Istanbul, Turkey, using a novel lightweight total station integrated with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, the QDaedalus system. The observed VDs are unique in that, they were measured for the first time in Istanbul, and they form Turkey’s first dense astrogeodetic network. To establish the Istanbul Astrogeodetic Network (IAN), we selected 30 benchmarks (BMs) with known geodetic coordinates. A total of 21 of these BMs are located in the coastal zone allowing us to investigate the quality of global gravity field models (GGFMs) along the coast of Istanbul. The standard deviations for our VDs are approximately ±0.20″which is commensurate with the VD accuracy of early studies assessing the QDaedalus observations. In particular, dedicated comparison measurements were conducted in two geographic regions—Munich and Istanbul—to control the accuracy of the VD measurements. Our new VD data set within the IAN was compared with predicted VDs from the Global Gravity Model plus (GGMplus) and the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). The VD residuals between the QDaedalus observations, and predicted values from GGMplus and EGM2008 models tend to increase towards the coastlines, where discrepancies of several arcseconds were found. At 15 coastal BMs, the residuals in the N-S components exceed 2″ and reach values as large as 6″ while residuals in the E-W components exceeded 2″ at 3 BMs. We interpret these large differences as an indication of the current weaknesses in the GGF Ms, most likely reflecting errors in the altimetry-derived marine gravity measurements, which have been incorporated in the EGM2008 and GGMplus models, or the lack of coastal terrestrial gravity measurements, or both. We conclude that the astrogeodetic VDs observed by the QDaedalus are invaluable for independently assessing the quality of coastal-zone terrestrial gravity data sets and GGFMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"64 3","pages":"306 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-019-0591-2","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality assessment of global gravity field models in coastal zones: A case study using astrogeodetic vertical deflections in Istanbul, Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Müge Albayrak,&nbsp;Christian Hirt,&nbsp;Sébastien Guillaume,&nbsp;Kerem Halicioglu,&nbsp;M. Tevfik Özlüdemir,&nbsp;C. K. Shum\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11200-019-0591-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We present the first high-precision astrogeodetic vertical deflection (VD) observations collected in Istanbul, Turkey, using a novel lightweight total station integrated with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, the QDaedalus system. The observed VDs are unique in that, they were measured for the first time in Istanbul, and they form Turkey’s first dense astrogeodetic network. To establish the Istanbul Astrogeodetic Network (IAN), we selected 30 benchmarks (BMs) with known geodetic coordinates. A total of 21 of these BMs are located in the coastal zone allowing us to investigate the quality of global gravity field models (GGFMs) along the coast of Istanbul. The standard deviations for our VDs are approximately ±0.20″which is commensurate with the VD accuracy of early studies assessing the QDaedalus observations. In particular, dedicated comparison measurements were conducted in two geographic regions—Munich and Istanbul—to control the accuracy of the VD measurements. Our new VD data set within the IAN was compared with predicted VDs from the Global Gravity Model plus (GGMplus) and the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). The VD residuals between the QDaedalus observations, and predicted values from GGMplus and EGM2008 models tend to increase towards the coastlines, where discrepancies of several arcseconds were found. At 15 coastal BMs, the residuals in the N-S components exceed 2″ and reach values as large as 6″ while residuals in the E-W components exceeded 2″ at 3 BMs. We interpret these large differences as an indication of the current weaknesses in the GGF Ms, most likely reflecting errors in the altimetry-derived marine gravity measurements, which have been incorporated in the EGM2008 and GGMplus models, or the lack of coastal terrestrial gravity measurements, or both. We conclude that the astrogeodetic VDs observed by the QDaedalus are invaluable for independently assessing the quality of coastal-zone terrestrial gravity data sets and GGFMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"306 - 329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-019-0591-2\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-019-0591-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-019-0591-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们展示了在土耳其伊斯坦布尔收集的第一个高精度天文大地测量垂直偏转(VD)观测数据,使用了一种新型的轻型全站仪,集成了电荷耦合器件(CCD)相机,QDaedalus系统。观测到的VDs的独特之处在于,它们是在伊斯坦布尔首次测量的,它们形成了土耳其第一个密集的天体大地测量网。为了建立伊斯坦布尔天文大地测量网(IAN),我们选择了30个具有已知大地坐标的基准(bm)。这些bm中有21个位于沿海地区,使我们能够调查伊斯坦布尔沿海地区全球重力场模型(GGFMs)的质量。我们的VD的标准偏差约为±0.20″,这与评估q代达罗斯观测的早期研究的VD精度相称。特别地,在慕尼黑和伊斯坦布尔两个地理区域进行了专门的比较测量,以控制VD测量的准确性。我们在IAN内的新VD数据集与全球引力模型plus (GGMplus)和地球引力模型2008 (EGM2008)的预测VD进行了比较。QDaedalus观测值与GGMplus和EGM2008模式的预测值之间的VD残差倾向于向海岸线方向增加,在那里发现了几个弧秒的差异。在15个岸基上,N-S分量的残差超过2″,达到6″,E-W分量的残差在3个岸基上超过2″。我们将这些巨大的差异解释为GGF模型目前存在的弱点,这很可能反映了EGM2008和GGMplus模式中包含的基于测高的海洋重力测量的误差,或者缺乏沿海陆地重力测量,或者两者兼有。我们的结论是,q代达罗斯观测到的天体大地测量VDs对于独立评估海岸带陆地重力数据集和GGFMs的质量是非常宝贵的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality assessment of global gravity field models in coastal zones: A case study using astrogeodetic vertical deflections in Istanbul, Turkey

We present the first high-precision astrogeodetic vertical deflection (VD) observations collected in Istanbul, Turkey, using a novel lightweight total station integrated with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, the QDaedalus system. The observed VDs are unique in that, they were measured for the first time in Istanbul, and they form Turkey’s first dense astrogeodetic network. To establish the Istanbul Astrogeodetic Network (IAN), we selected 30 benchmarks (BMs) with known geodetic coordinates. A total of 21 of these BMs are located in the coastal zone allowing us to investigate the quality of global gravity field models (GGFMs) along the coast of Istanbul. The standard deviations for our VDs are approximately ±0.20″which is commensurate with the VD accuracy of early studies assessing the QDaedalus observations. In particular, dedicated comparison measurements were conducted in two geographic regions—Munich and Istanbul—to control the accuracy of the VD measurements. Our new VD data set within the IAN was compared with predicted VDs from the Global Gravity Model plus (GGMplus) and the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). The VD residuals between the QDaedalus observations, and predicted values from GGMplus and EGM2008 models tend to increase towards the coastlines, where discrepancies of several arcseconds were found. At 15 coastal BMs, the residuals in the N-S components exceed 2″ and reach values as large as 6″ while residuals in the E-W components exceeded 2″ at 3 BMs. We interpret these large differences as an indication of the current weaknesses in the GGF Ms, most likely reflecting errors in the altimetry-derived marine gravity measurements, which have been incorporated in the EGM2008 and GGMplus models, or the lack of coastal terrestrial gravity measurements, or both. We conclude that the astrogeodetic VDs observed by the QDaedalus are invaluable for independently assessing the quality of coastal-zone terrestrial gravity data sets and GGFMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信