碳纤维增强层合复合材料断裂模式及分层行为的实验研究

Q3 Engineering
Diagnostyka Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.29354/diag/156749
Mustafa Musafir, Zuhair Ameer, A. Hamzah
{"title":"碳纤维增强层合复合材料断裂模式及分层行为的实验研究","authors":"Mustafa Musafir, Zuhair Ameer, A. Hamzah","doi":"10.29354/diag/156749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanically, composite laminates perform exceptionally well in-plane but poorly out-of-plane. Interlaminar damage, known as \"delamination,\" is a major issue for composite laminates. Results from Mode-I and Mode-II experimental testing on twill-woven carbon fiber reinforced (CFRP) laminates are analyzed in this paper. Composite Mode-I fracture toughness was determined using three different methods in accordance with ASTM D5528: modified beam theory, compliance calibration, and a codified compliance calibration. Two methods, the Compliance Calibration Method and the Compliance-Based Beam Method, were used to determine the Mode-II fracture toughness in accordance with ASTM D7905. Stick-slip behavior is quite evident in the composite's Mode-I fracture toughness test findings. The MBT technique's 𝐺 Ic values for initiation and propagation are 0.533 and 0.679 KJ/m 2 , respectively. When comparing the MBT approach to the industry-standard ASTM procedure for determining fracture toughness Mode-I, the MBT method was shown to be highly compatible. Furthermore, the 𝐺 IIc values for the CBBM technique are 1.65 KJ/m 2 for non-pre cracked and 1.4 KJ/m 2 for pre-cracked materials. The CBBM method shows a good method to evaluate fracture toughness Mode-II, due to not needing to monitor the length of the crack during delamination growth to get the value of the fracture toughness.","PeriodicalId":52164,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostyka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An experimental investigation of fracture modes and delamination behavior of carbon fiber reinforced laminated composite materials\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Musafir, Zuhair Ameer, A. Hamzah\",\"doi\":\"10.29354/diag/156749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mechanically, composite laminates perform exceptionally well in-plane but poorly out-of-plane. Interlaminar damage, known as \\\"delamination,\\\" is a major issue for composite laminates. Results from Mode-I and Mode-II experimental testing on twill-woven carbon fiber reinforced (CFRP) laminates are analyzed in this paper. Composite Mode-I fracture toughness was determined using three different methods in accordance with ASTM D5528: modified beam theory, compliance calibration, and a codified compliance calibration. Two methods, the Compliance Calibration Method and the Compliance-Based Beam Method, were used to determine the Mode-II fracture toughness in accordance with ASTM D7905. Stick-slip behavior is quite evident in the composite's Mode-I fracture toughness test findings. The MBT technique's 𝐺 Ic values for initiation and propagation are 0.533 and 0.679 KJ/m 2 , respectively. When comparing the MBT approach to the industry-standard ASTM procedure for determining fracture toughness Mode-I, the MBT method was shown to be highly compatible. Furthermore, the 𝐺 IIc values for the CBBM technique are 1.65 KJ/m 2 for non-pre cracked and 1.4 KJ/m 2 for pre-cracked materials. The CBBM method shows a good method to evaluate fracture toughness Mode-II, due to not needing to monitor the length of the crack during delamination growth to get the value of the fracture toughness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostyka\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostyka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/156749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostyka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/156749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机械上,复合层压板在平面内的表现非常好,但在平面外的表现很差。层间损伤,被称为“分层”,是复合层压板的一个主要问题。对斜纹织物碳纤维增强(CFRP)层压板的i型和ii型试验结果进行了分析。根据ASTM D5528,采用三种不同的方法测定复合材料的i型断裂韧性:修正梁理论、柔度校准和规范柔度校准。根据ASTM D7905的要求,采用柔度校准法和基于柔度的梁法两种方法来确定ii型断裂韧性。黏滑行为在复合材料i型断裂韧性试验中非常明显。MBT技术产生和传播的𝐺Ic值分别为0.533和0.679 KJ/ m2。当将MBT方法与行业标准ASTM程序进行比较以确定断裂韧性模型i时,MBT方法被证明是高度兼容的。此外,CBBM技术的𝐺IIc值对于未预裂材料为1.65 KJ/ m2,对于预裂材料为1.4 KJ/ m2。CBBM方法是一种很好的评估断裂韧性的方法,因为它不需要监测分层扩展过程中裂纹的长度来获得断裂韧性的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An experimental investigation of fracture modes and delamination behavior of carbon fiber reinforced laminated composite materials
Mechanically, composite laminates perform exceptionally well in-plane but poorly out-of-plane. Interlaminar damage, known as "delamination," is a major issue for composite laminates. Results from Mode-I and Mode-II experimental testing on twill-woven carbon fiber reinforced (CFRP) laminates are analyzed in this paper. Composite Mode-I fracture toughness was determined using three different methods in accordance with ASTM D5528: modified beam theory, compliance calibration, and a codified compliance calibration. Two methods, the Compliance Calibration Method and the Compliance-Based Beam Method, were used to determine the Mode-II fracture toughness in accordance with ASTM D7905. Stick-slip behavior is quite evident in the composite's Mode-I fracture toughness test findings. The MBT technique's 𝐺 Ic values for initiation and propagation are 0.533 and 0.679 KJ/m 2 , respectively. When comparing the MBT approach to the industry-standard ASTM procedure for determining fracture toughness Mode-I, the MBT method was shown to be highly compatible. Furthermore, the 𝐺 IIc values for the CBBM technique are 1.65 KJ/m 2 for non-pre cracked and 1.4 KJ/m 2 for pre-cracked materials. The CBBM method shows a good method to evaluate fracture toughness Mode-II, due to not needing to monitor the length of the crack during delamination growth to get the value of the fracture toughness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostyka
Diagnostyka Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnostyka – is a quarterly published by the Polish Society of Technical Diagnostics (PSTD). The journal “Diagnostyka” was established by the decision of the Presidium of Main Board of the Polish Society of Technical Diagnostics on August, 21st 2000 and replaced published since 1990 reference book of the PSTD named “Diagnosta”. In the years 2000-2003 there were issued annually two numbers of the journal, since 2004 “Diagnostyka” is issued as a quarterly. Research areas covered include: -theory of the technical diagnostics, -experimental diagnostic research of processes, objects and systems, -analytical, symptom and simulation models of technical objects, -algorithms, methods and devices for diagnosing, prognosis and genesis of condition of technical objects, -methods for detection, localization and identification of damages of technical objects, -artificial intelligence in diagnostics, neural nets, fuzzy systems, genetic algorithms, expert systems, -application of technical diagnostics, -diagnostic issues in mechanical and civil engineering, -medical and biological diagnostics with signal processing application, -structural health monitoring, -machines, -noise and vibration, -analysis of technical and civil systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信