时间浪费在任务、关系和流程冲突上

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Phyllis Dirrler, S. Podruzsik
{"title":"时间浪费在任务、关系和流程冲突上","authors":"Phyllis Dirrler, S. Podruzsik","doi":"10.3846/btp.2023.17774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are various ways to measure conflict costs, however no study has considered the distinction of conflict types in the approaches yet. The purpose of this study is to measure internal indirect conflict costs in terms of lost time and to evaluate the association to task-, relationship-, and process conflict. An online survey with 507 respondents was conducted to gather data on individual conflict situations. The measurement of internal indirect conflict costs and different conflict types was based on former research. Multiple Regression and Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to test our hypotheses. We found support that relationship conflict influences the amount of lost time on internal indirect conflict costs. Task conflict did not indicate any significant association. Process conflict demonstrated mixed results. The overall variable did not have a significant effect, however in case of international conflict set-ups process conflict was significantly linked to conflict costs. The multiple regression has an explanatory power of approximately 25%. Future research should consider other variables to be included affecting internal indirect conflict costs. Process conflict should also be researched thoroughly again. The distinction of logistical and contribution conflict was not possible.","PeriodicalId":40066,"journal":{"name":"Business: Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIME LOST ON TASK-, RELATIONSHIP AND PROCESS CONFLICT\",\"authors\":\"Phyllis Dirrler, S. Podruzsik\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/btp.2023.17774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are various ways to measure conflict costs, however no study has considered the distinction of conflict types in the approaches yet. The purpose of this study is to measure internal indirect conflict costs in terms of lost time and to evaluate the association to task-, relationship-, and process conflict. An online survey with 507 respondents was conducted to gather data on individual conflict situations. The measurement of internal indirect conflict costs and different conflict types was based on former research. Multiple Regression and Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to test our hypotheses. We found support that relationship conflict influences the amount of lost time on internal indirect conflict costs. Task conflict did not indicate any significant association. Process conflict demonstrated mixed results. The overall variable did not have a significant effect, however in case of international conflict set-ups process conflict was significantly linked to conflict costs. The multiple regression has an explanatory power of approximately 25%. Future research should consider other variables to be included affecting internal indirect conflict costs. Process conflict should also be researched thoroughly again. The distinction of logistical and contribution conflict was not possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.17774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2023.17774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

衡量冲突成本的方法多种多样,但目前还没有研究考虑到方法中冲突类型的区分。本研究旨在以时间损失来衡量内部间接冲突成本,并评估其与任务冲突、关系冲突和过程冲突的关联。对507名受访者进行了一项在线调查,以收集个人冲突情况的数据。内部间接冲突成本和不同冲突类型的度量是在前人研究的基础上进行的。我们使用多元回归和Kruskal-Wallis检验来检验我们的假设。我们发现支持关系冲突影响时间损失量对内部间接冲突成本的影响。任务冲突没有显示出任何显著的关联。过程冲突显示了混合的结果。总的变量没有显著的影响,但是在国际冲突的情况下,进程冲突与冲突成本有显著的联系。多元回归的解释力约为25%。未来的研究应考虑影响内部间接冲突成本的其他变量。过程冲突也应该再次深入研究。不可能区分后勤冲突和捐款冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TIME LOST ON TASK-, RELATIONSHIP AND PROCESS CONFLICT
There are various ways to measure conflict costs, however no study has considered the distinction of conflict types in the approaches yet. The purpose of this study is to measure internal indirect conflict costs in terms of lost time and to evaluate the association to task-, relationship-, and process conflict. An online survey with 507 respondents was conducted to gather data on individual conflict situations. The measurement of internal indirect conflict costs and different conflict types was based on former research. Multiple Regression and Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to test our hypotheses. We found support that relationship conflict influences the amount of lost time on internal indirect conflict costs. Task conflict did not indicate any significant association. Process conflict demonstrated mixed results. The overall variable did not have a significant effect, however in case of international conflict set-ups process conflict was significantly linked to conflict costs. The multiple regression has an explanatory power of approximately 25%. Future research should consider other variables to be included affecting internal indirect conflict costs. Process conflict should also be researched thoroughly again. The distinction of logistical and contribution conflict was not possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business: Theory and Practice
Business: Theory and Practice Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Business: Theory and Practice" is published from 2000. 1 vol (4 issues) per year are published. Articles in Lithuanian, English, German, Russian. The Journal has been included into database "ICONDA" and "Business Source Complete".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信