促进气候行动和能源转型的未来研究方向

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Udayan Singh , Samarth Singh
{"title":"促进气候行动和能源转型的未来研究方向","authors":"Udayan Singh ,&nbsp;Samarth Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The scientific literature on climate actions, generally, and energy transitions, specifically, places a high premium on rigor and attention-to-detail when communicating their findings. While this is necessary, it may not always be most readily accessible to diverse audiences. This perspective describes the authors’ opinions on balancing future research directions and communication strategies to increase acceptance of widespread climate action among policymakers and the public. We suggest four approaches to do so: (1) use of co-benefits to appeal to diverse audiences, (2) reducing polarization in discussions, (3) use of more optimistic tones, and (4) finding the right balance between quantitative findings and qualitative narratives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future research directions to facilitate climate action and energy transitions\",\"authors\":\"Udayan Singh ,&nbsp;Samarth Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The scientific literature on climate actions, generally, and energy transitions, specifically, places a high premium on rigor and attention-to-detail when communicating their findings. While this is necessary, it may not always be most readily accessible to diverse audiences. This perspective describes the authors’ opinions on balancing future research directions and communication strategies to increase acceptance of widespread climate action among policymakers and the public. We suggest four approaches to do so: (1) use of co-benefits to appeal to diverse audiences, (2) reducing polarization in discussions, (3) use of more optimistic tones, and (4) finding the right balance between quantitative findings and qualitative narratives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and climate change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278722000228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278722000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于气候行动的科学文献,一般来说,特别是能源转型,在传达他们的发现时,高度重视严谨性和对细节的关注。虽然这是必要的,但它可能并不总是最容易被不同的受众所接受。这一视角描述了作者关于平衡未来研究方向和传播策略以提高决策者和公众对广泛气候行动的接受度的观点。我们建议采用四种方法来做到这一点:(1)利用共同利益来吸引不同的受众,(2)减少讨论中的两极分化,(3)使用更乐观的语气,(4)在定量发现和定性叙述之间找到适当的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Future research directions to facilitate climate action and energy transitions

The scientific literature on climate actions, generally, and energy transitions, specifically, places a high premium on rigor and attention-to-detail when communicating their findings. While this is necessary, it may not always be most readily accessible to diverse audiences. This perspective describes the authors’ opinions on balancing future research directions and communication strategies to increase acceptance of widespread climate action among policymakers and the public. We suggest four approaches to do so: (1) use of co-benefits to appeal to diverse audiences, (2) reducing polarization in discussions, (3) use of more optimistic tones, and (4) finding the right balance between quantitative findings and qualitative narratives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信