机器学习——一种新的文化工具?机器学习+跨专业学习的“再文本化”视角

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David Guile
{"title":"机器学习——一种新的文化工具?机器学习+跨专业学习的“再文本化”视角","authors":"David Guile","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper argues that (a) Machine Learning (ML) constitutes a cultural tool capable of learning through perceiving patterns in data, (b) the kind of learning ML is capable of nevertheless constitutes a more circumscribed kind of learning compared with how that concept has been interpreted in sociocultural (S-c) theory; and, (c) the development of ML is therefore further extending and distributing the complex relationship between human and machine cognition and learning. The paper explores these contentions by firstly, providing a broad-based account of the conception of cultural tools in S-c Theory. Secondly, offering a genealogy of ML, including the model of learning that underpins ML and highlights the challenge that a cultural too capable of some kind of learning presents for the extant S-c conception of a cultural tool. Thirdly, identifying the new human-machine working-learning problem the ML model of learning is generating. Finally, argues the concept of <em>recontextualization</em> offers a way to address that problem by providing a holistic perspective on the relationship between ML and IPL models of learning. In making this argument the paper distinguishes between the ML predictive and the Chat GPT answer to question(s) model of learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning – A new kind of cultural tool? A “recontextualisation” perspective on machine learning + interprofessional learning\",\"authors\":\"David Guile\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The paper argues that (a) Machine Learning (ML) constitutes a cultural tool capable of learning through perceiving patterns in data, (b) the kind of learning ML is capable of nevertheless constitutes a more circumscribed kind of learning compared with how that concept has been interpreted in sociocultural (S-c) theory; and, (c) the development of ML is therefore further extending and distributing the complex relationship between human and machine cognition and learning. The paper explores these contentions by firstly, providing a broad-based account of the conception of cultural tools in S-c Theory. Secondly, offering a genealogy of ML, including the model of learning that underpins ML and highlights the challenge that a cultural too capable of some kind of learning presents for the extant S-c conception of a cultural tool. Thirdly, identifying the new human-machine working-learning problem the ML model of learning is generating. Finally, argues the concept of <em>recontextualization</em> offers a way to address that problem by providing a holistic perspective on the relationship between ML and IPL models of learning. In making this argument the paper distinguishes between the ML predictive and the Chat GPT answer to question(s) model of learning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Culture and Social Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000545\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文认为(a)机器学习(ML)构成了一种能够通过感知数据模式进行学习的文化工具,(b)与社会文化(S-c)理论中对该概念的解释相比,机器学习(ML)能够构成一种更有限的学习类型;(c)因此,ML的发展进一步扩展和分布了人与机器认知和学习之间的复杂关系。本文首先对S-c理论中的文化工具概念进行了广泛的阐述,探讨了这些争论。其次,提供ML的谱系,包括支持ML的学习模型,并强调具有某种学习能力的文化对现有的S-c文化工具概念提出的挑战。第三,识别机器学习模型产生的新的人机工作学习问题。最后,作者认为重新语境化的概念提供了一种解决这个问题的方法,它提供了一个关于ML和IPL学习模型之间关系的整体视角。在提出这一论点时,本文区分了ML预测和Chat GPT回答问题的学习模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning – A new kind of cultural tool? A “recontextualisation” perspective on machine learning + interprofessional learning

The paper argues that (a) Machine Learning (ML) constitutes a cultural tool capable of learning through perceiving patterns in data, (b) the kind of learning ML is capable of nevertheless constitutes a more circumscribed kind of learning compared with how that concept has been interpreted in sociocultural (S-c) theory; and, (c) the development of ML is therefore further extending and distributing the complex relationship between human and machine cognition and learning. The paper explores these contentions by firstly, providing a broad-based account of the conception of cultural tools in S-c Theory. Secondly, offering a genealogy of ML, including the model of learning that underpins ML and highlights the challenge that a cultural too capable of some kind of learning presents for the extant S-c conception of a cultural tool. Thirdly, identifying the new human-machine working-learning problem the ML model of learning is generating. Finally, argues the concept of recontextualization offers a way to address that problem by providing a holistic perspective on the relationship between ML and IPL models of learning. In making this argument the paper distinguishes between the ML predictive and the Chat GPT answer to question(s) model of learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信