在一个蓄积的原生草原牧场,在补充和未补充的牛肉犊牛之间,落叶动态遵循相似的模式

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Fiorella Cazzuli, Carolina Bremm, Martín Jaurena, Dennis Poppi, Martín Durante, Marcelo Adolfo Benvenutti, Jean Victor Savian, Thais Devincenzi, Pablo Rovira, Ximena Lagomarsino, Andrés Hirigoyen, Fernando A. Lattanzi
{"title":"在一个蓄积的原生草原牧场,在补充和未补充的牛肉犊牛之间,落叶动态遵循相似的模式","authors":"Fiorella Cazzuli,&nbsp;Carolina Bremm,&nbsp;Martín Jaurena,&nbsp;Dennis Poppi,&nbsp;Martín Durante,&nbsp;Marcelo Adolfo Benvenutti,&nbsp;Jean Victor Savian,&nbsp;Thais Devincenzi,&nbsp;Pablo Rovira,&nbsp;Ximena Lagomarsino,&nbsp;Andrés Hirigoyen,&nbsp;Fernando A. Lattanzi","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is unclear to what extent and on which variables does supplementing beef cattle on native grasslands affect sward structure, specifically on the dynamics of its grazing horizons. Three hypotheses were tested: (i) during a grazing down process under similar forage allowance, supplemented animals take longer to finish each grazing stratum, than their unsupplemented counterparts, (ii) in both cases, the upper stratum will be heavily depleted before the subsequent strata are grazed, (iii) some species and/or forage fractions are consumed faster than others, regardless of the animals being supplemented (corn dried distillers grains with solubles, DDGS, at 0.7% of their body weight, BW, on a dry matter, DM, basis) or not. Three blocks of stockpiled native grasslands were used and split into two treatments plots (n = 6), on which either supplemented (S) or control (C) heifers of 10.6 ± 0.6 months of age and an initial BW of 143 ± 9 kg, were used. A 2.5 × 0.5 m observation grid was installed on the sward, generating 384 observation points on each plot. On these observation plots, sward height (SH) and visually assessed green forage mass percentage (%G) were registered every other day for 12 consecutive days. No differences were found between the horizontal grazing dynamics between supplemented and control animals in terms of how they switched from the upper grazing horizon to the successive ones. In both cases, when the upper grazing horizon was heavily depleted, the subsequent horizon was being depleted by its half. Differences of preference for C3 species over C4 was observed for both treatments, but this effect was more meaningful for control animals. Grazing time never fully compensated for the decline in intake rate during depletion throughout the grazing horizons. Pasture intake declined when the animals transition from grazing the top grazing horizons to the lower horizons, irrespective of the level of supplementation. Managing the sward structure in terms of sward height will be beneficial to maximizing individual animal performance, for both C and S animals. Native grasslands paddocks with a greater C3 gasses predominance will always be preferred to C4 dominated paddocks, regardless of an eventual supplementation practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The defoliation dynamics of a stockpiled native grassland pasture follow similar patterns between supplemented and unsupplemented beef calves\",\"authors\":\"Fiorella Cazzuli,&nbsp;Carolina Bremm,&nbsp;Martín Jaurena,&nbsp;Dennis Poppi,&nbsp;Martín Durante,&nbsp;Marcelo Adolfo Benvenutti,&nbsp;Jean Victor Savian,&nbsp;Thais Devincenzi,&nbsp;Pablo Rovira,&nbsp;Ximena Lagomarsino,&nbsp;Andrés Hirigoyen,&nbsp;Fernando A. Lattanzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It is unclear to what extent and on which variables does supplementing beef cattle on native grasslands affect sward structure, specifically on the dynamics of its grazing horizons. Three hypotheses were tested: (i) during a grazing down process under similar forage allowance, supplemented animals take longer to finish each grazing stratum, than their unsupplemented counterparts, (ii) in both cases, the upper stratum will be heavily depleted before the subsequent strata are grazed, (iii) some species and/or forage fractions are consumed faster than others, regardless of the animals being supplemented (corn dried distillers grains with solubles, DDGS, at 0.7% of their body weight, BW, on a dry matter, DM, basis) or not. Three blocks of stockpiled native grasslands were used and split into two treatments plots (n = 6), on which either supplemented (S) or control (C) heifers of 10.6 ± 0.6 months of age and an initial BW of 143 ± 9 kg, were used. A 2.5 × 0.5 m observation grid was installed on the sward, generating 384 observation points on each plot. On these observation plots, sward height (SH) and visually assessed green forage mass percentage (%G) were registered every other day for 12 consecutive days. No differences were found between the horizontal grazing dynamics between supplemented and control animals in terms of how they switched from the upper grazing horizon to the successive ones. In both cases, when the upper grazing horizon was heavily depleted, the subsequent horizon was being depleted by its half. Differences of preference for C3 species over C4 was observed for both treatments, but this effect was more meaningful for control animals. Grazing time never fully compensated for the decline in intake rate during depletion throughout the grazing horizons. Pasture intake declined when the animals transition from grazing the top grazing horizons to the lower horizons, irrespective of the level of supplementation. Managing the sward structure in terms of sward height will be beneficial to maximizing individual animal performance, for both C and S animals. Native grasslands paddocks with a greater C3 gasses predominance will always be preferred to C4 dominated paddocks, regardless of an eventual supplementation practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前尚不清楚在原生草原上补充肉牛对草地结构,特别是放牧界的动态影响有多大程度和哪些变量。我们检验了三个假设:(i)在相同饲料量的放牧过程中,补充饲料的动物比未补充饲料的动物需要更长的时间来完成每一个放牧层,(ii)在这两种情况下,上层在随后的层被放牧之前就会严重枯竭,(iii)一些物种和/或饲料馏分比其他物种消耗得更快,无论补充饲料的动物是什么(玉米干酒糟和可溶性物,DDGS,占其体重的0.7%,体重,干物质)。DM,基础)或不。利用3块原始草原,将其分成2个处理地块(n = 6),分别饲喂10.6±0.6月龄、初始体重为143±9 kg的补种(S)和对照(C)母牛。在草地上设置2.5 × 0.5 m的观测网格,每个地块上产生384个观测点。在这些观察样地,每隔一天记录一次草皮高度(SH)和目测绿草质量百分比(%G),连续12 d。在水平放牧动态方面,补充组和对照组动物从上层放牧水平向下层放牧水平切换的方式没有差异。在这两种情况下,当上层放牧地面严重枯竭时,随后的地面将被消耗一半。两种处理对C3物种的偏好差异大于C4物种,但这种效应在对照动物中更有意义。放牧时间从来没有完全补偿在整个放牧视界的消耗期间采食量的下降。无论饲粮添加水平如何,当动物从上层放牧过渡到下层放牧时,采食量都有所下降。根据草的高度来管理草的结构将有利于最大化个体动物的生产性能,对于C和S动物都是如此。无论最终是否补充,C3气体优势较大的天然草地围场总是优于C4气体优势的围场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The defoliation dynamics of a stockpiled native grassland pasture follow similar patterns between supplemented and unsupplemented beef calves

It is unclear to what extent and on which variables does supplementing beef cattle on native grasslands affect sward structure, specifically on the dynamics of its grazing horizons. Three hypotheses were tested: (i) during a grazing down process under similar forage allowance, supplemented animals take longer to finish each grazing stratum, than their unsupplemented counterparts, (ii) in both cases, the upper stratum will be heavily depleted before the subsequent strata are grazed, (iii) some species and/or forage fractions are consumed faster than others, regardless of the animals being supplemented (corn dried distillers grains with solubles, DDGS, at 0.7% of their body weight, BW, on a dry matter, DM, basis) or not. Three blocks of stockpiled native grasslands were used and split into two treatments plots (n = 6), on which either supplemented (S) or control (C) heifers of 10.6 ± 0.6 months of age and an initial BW of 143 ± 9 kg, were used. A 2.5 × 0.5 m observation grid was installed on the sward, generating 384 observation points on each plot. On these observation plots, sward height (SH) and visually assessed green forage mass percentage (%G) were registered every other day for 12 consecutive days. No differences were found between the horizontal grazing dynamics between supplemented and control animals in terms of how they switched from the upper grazing horizon to the successive ones. In both cases, when the upper grazing horizon was heavily depleted, the subsequent horizon was being depleted by its half. Differences of preference for C3 species over C4 was observed for both treatments, but this effect was more meaningful for control animals. Grazing time never fully compensated for the decline in intake rate during depletion throughout the grazing horizons. Pasture intake declined when the animals transition from grazing the top grazing horizons to the lower horizons, irrespective of the level of supplementation. Managing the sward structure in terms of sward height will be beneficial to maximizing individual animal performance, for both C and S animals. Native grasslands paddocks with a greater C3 gasses predominance will always be preferred to C4 dominated paddocks, regardless of an eventual supplementation practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信