克雷伯氏菌和不动杆菌呼吸机相关性肺炎的患病率、发病率和临床结局

IF 1.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Hossein Mahjobipoor, M. Sajadi, A. Honarmand, Mojtaba Rahimi-Varposhti, S. Yadegari, Shirin Fattahpour, M. Soleimani
{"title":"克雷伯氏菌和不动杆菌呼吸机相关性肺炎的患病率、发病率和临床结局","authors":"Hossein Mahjobipoor, M. Sajadi, A. Honarmand, Mojtaba Rahimi-Varposhti, S. Yadegari, Shirin Fattahpour, M. Soleimani","doi":"10.34172/ipp.2022.34412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance identification for each hospital has benefits in management of nosocomial infections. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial susceptibility of meropenem against Acinetobacter and Klebsiella strains in samples obtained from hospitalized patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with VAP were selected from the intensive care unit (ICU) of Amin hospital in Isfahan. Lung secretions were collected and tested for bacterial infections. In samples with the positive bacterial infection, E-test and agar diffusion test were used to determine and compare the susceptibility of Acinetobacter and Klebsiella strains to meropenem. Results: The two susceptibility testing methods – E-test and agar diffusion test – showed similar results in 87 cases (87%) therefore, 84 cases were resistant and three cases were susceptible to meropenem. However, in 13 cases, the result of the agar diffusion test was resistant and the result of E-test was sensitive. According to the Kappa test, the agreement between the two tests was 0.87 and statistically significant (P <0.001). Conclusion: Due to the high resistance of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter strains to meropenem, it should not be used as an experimental treatment in patients diagnosed with VAP caused by these strains. We recommend using meropenem for Acinetobacter and Klebsiella after susceptibility testing by E-test confirmed its efficacy.","PeriodicalId":13454,"journal":{"name":"Immunopathologia Persa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence incidence and clinical outcome of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter ventilator-associated pneumonia\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Mahjobipoor, M. Sajadi, A. Honarmand, Mojtaba Rahimi-Varposhti, S. Yadegari, Shirin Fattahpour, M. Soleimani\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ipp.2022.34412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance identification for each hospital has benefits in management of nosocomial infections. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial susceptibility of meropenem against Acinetobacter and Klebsiella strains in samples obtained from hospitalized patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with VAP were selected from the intensive care unit (ICU) of Amin hospital in Isfahan. Lung secretions were collected and tested for bacterial infections. In samples with the positive bacterial infection, E-test and agar diffusion test were used to determine and compare the susceptibility of Acinetobacter and Klebsiella strains to meropenem. Results: The two susceptibility testing methods – E-test and agar diffusion test – showed similar results in 87 cases (87%) therefore, 84 cases were resistant and three cases were susceptible to meropenem. However, in 13 cases, the result of the agar diffusion test was resistant and the result of E-test was sensitive. According to the Kappa test, the agreement between the two tests was 0.87 and statistically significant (P <0.001). Conclusion: Due to the high resistance of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter strains to meropenem, it should not be used as an experimental treatment in patients diagnosed with VAP caused by these strains. We recommend using meropenem for Acinetobacter and Klebsiella after susceptibility testing by E-test confirmed its efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunopathologia Persa\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunopathologia Persa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2022.34412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopathologia Persa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2022.34412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:每个医院的抗菌药物耐药性鉴定对医院感染的管理都有好处。目的:本研究的目的是确定美罗培南对来自呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)住院患者的样本中的不动杆菌和克雷伯菌菌株的耐药性。患者和方法:在这项横断面研究中,从伊斯法罕阿明医院的重症监护室(ICU)选择100名VAP患者。收集肺部分泌物并检测细菌感染情况。在细菌感染阳性的样品中,使用E试验和琼脂扩散试验来测定和比较不动杆菌和克雷伯菌菌株对美罗培南的易感性。结果:两种药敏试验方法——E试验和琼脂扩散试验——在87例(87%)中显示出相似的结果,因此,84例对美罗培南耐药,3例对美罗培南敏感。然而,在13例病例中,琼脂扩散试验的结果是耐药的,而E试验的结果则是敏感的。根据Kappa检验,两种检验之间的一致性为0.87,具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:由于克雷伯菌和不动杆菌菌株对美罗培南具有较高的耐药性,因此不应将其用作诊断为由这些菌株引起的VAP的患者的实验治疗。在E试验的药敏试验证实美罗培南的疗效后,我们建议对不动杆菌和克雷伯菌使用美罗培宁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence incidence and clinical outcome of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter ventilator-associated pneumonia
Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance identification for each hospital has benefits in management of nosocomial infections. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine antimicrobial susceptibility of meropenem against Acinetobacter and Klebsiella strains in samples obtained from hospitalized patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with VAP were selected from the intensive care unit (ICU) of Amin hospital in Isfahan. Lung secretions were collected and tested for bacterial infections. In samples with the positive bacterial infection, E-test and agar diffusion test were used to determine and compare the susceptibility of Acinetobacter and Klebsiella strains to meropenem. Results: The two susceptibility testing methods – E-test and agar diffusion test – showed similar results in 87 cases (87%) therefore, 84 cases were resistant and three cases were susceptible to meropenem. However, in 13 cases, the result of the agar diffusion test was resistant and the result of E-test was sensitive. According to the Kappa test, the agreement between the two tests was 0.87 and statistically significant (P <0.001). Conclusion: Due to the high resistance of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter strains to meropenem, it should not be used as an experimental treatment in patients diagnosed with VAP caused by these strains. We recommend using meropenem for Acinetobacter and Klebsiella after susceptibility testing by E-test confirmed its efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信