肝细胞癌经皮治疗:提高疗效、适用性和扩大消融标准

E. Gigante, O. Sutter, P. Nahon, O. Seror, J. Nault
{"title":"肝细胞癌经皮治疗:提高疗效、适用性和扩大消融标准","authors":"E. Gigante, O. Sutter, P. Nahon, O. Seror, J. Nault","doi":"10.1002/lci2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main curative treatments of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are liver resection, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation. Monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was the most widely used percutaneous treatment but has limitations in terms of applicability and efficacy. These limitations could be responsible for downgrading the treatment of early HCC not amenable to usual monopolar RFA, transplantation or resection and to a shift to palliative treatment. However, improvement in ablation techniques during the last 10 years including the development of microwave ablation, multibipolar RFA, irreversible electroporation but also new technical tricks for ablation allowed to optimize the efficacy and promote the wide application of percutaneous treatments in patients with early HCC. It helped also to explore the ability of percutaneous ablation to treat HCC outside current guidelines in order to ablate more lesions of larger sizes. In this review, we aim to describe how the improvement of ablation methods helps to maximize the number of patients treated for early HCC and to discuss if we could extend the usual ablation criteria in order to allocate more patients in a curative setting.","PeriodicalId":93331,"journal":{"name":"Liver cancer international","volume":"3 1","pages":"37 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma: Improving efficacy, applicability and extending ablation criteria\",\"authors\":\"E. Gigante, O. Sutter, P. Nahon, O. Seror, J. Nault\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lci2.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main curative treatments of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are liver resection, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation. Monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was the most widely used percutaneous treatment but has limitations in terms of applicability and efficacy. These limitations could be responsible for downgrading the treatment of early HCC not amenable to usual monopolar RFA, transplantation or resection and to a shift to palliative treatment. However, improvement in ablation techniques during the last 10 years including the development of microwave ablation, multibipolar RFA, irreversible electroporation but also new technical tricks for ablation allowed to optimize the efficacy and promote the wide application of percutaneous treatments in patients with early HCC. It helped also to explore the ability of percutaneous ablation to treat HCC outside current guidelines in order to ablate more lesions of larger sizes. In this review, we aim to describe how the improvement of ablation methods helps to maximize the number of patients treated for early HCC and to discuss if we could extend the usual ablation criteria in order to allocate more patients in a curative setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver cancer international\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver cancer international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lci2.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lci2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期肝细胞癌的主要治疗方法是肝切除、肝移植和经皮消融。单极射频消融(RFA)是目前应用最广泛的经皮治疗方法,但在适用性和有效性方面存在局限性。这些局限性可能导致早期HCC不能接受通常的单极RFA、移植或切除治疗,并转向姑息治疗。然而,近10年来消融技术的进步,包括微波消融、多极射频消融、不可逆电穿孔的发展,以及新的消融技术,使得经皮治疗在早期HCC患者中的疗效得到优化,并促进了经皮治疗的广泛应用。它也有助于探索经皮消融治疗目前指南之外的HCC的能力,以消融更多更大的病变。在这篇综述中,我们的目的是描述消融方法的改进如何帮助最大化早期HCC患者的治疗数量,并讨论我们是否可以延长通常的消融标准,以便在治疗环境中分配更多的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma: Improving efficacy, applicability and extending ablation criteria
The main curative treatments of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are liver resection, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation. Monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was the most widely used percutaneous treatment but has limitations in terms of applicability and efficacy. These limitations could be responsible for downgrading the treatment of early HCC not amenable to usual monopolar RFA, transplantation or resection and to a shift to palliative treatment. However, improvement in ablation techniques during the last 10 years including the development of microwave ablation, multibipolar RFA, irreversible electroporation but also new technical tricks for ablation allowed to optimize the efficacy and promote the wide application of percutaneous treatments in patients with early HCC. It helped also to explore the ability of percutaneous ablation to treat HCC outside current guidelines in order to ablate more lesions of larger sizes. In this review, we aim to describe how the improvement of ablation methods helps to maximize the number of patients treated for early HCC and to discuss if we could extend the usual ablation criteria in order to allocate more patients in a curative setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信