乌干达两所院校医学实验室学生的生物安全和生物风险管理做法评估

IF 3.5 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
John Roberts Padde , Winnie Akiteng , William Edema , Saad Mahjub Atiku , Julius Tibyangye , Job Tekakwo , Cosmas Andruga , Derick Hope , Benson Musinguzi , Jean Brenda Gesa , Lawrence Amadile , Robert Agondua
{"title":"乌干达两所院校医学实验室学生的生物安全和生物风险管理做法评估","authors":"John Roberts Padde ,&nbsp;Winnie Akiteng ,&nbsp;William Edema ,&nbsp;Saad Mahjub Atiku ,&nbsp;Julius Tibyangye ,&nbsp;Job Tekakwo ,&nbsp;Cosmas Andruga ,&nbsp;Derick Hope ,&nbsp;Benson Musinguzi ,&nbsp;Jean Brenda Gesa ,&nbsp;Lawrence Amadile ,&nbsp;Robert Agondua","doi":"10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medical laboratory workers handle clinical specimens, which are a threat of exposure to infectious agents. Notably, medical laboratory science students report for internships with only theoretical knowledge of biosafety and biorisk management practices, predisposing them to a higher risk of laboratory hazards. In this study, we assessed the influence of entry-level students' adherence to practices and attitudes towards biosafety and biorisk management during the Internship. An online survey tool was used to explore the practices and attitudes towards laboratory biosafety and risk management. Of the 96 students, 60 (62.5%) anonymous responses were received, and of these, 60.3% were direct entrants, and 32.8% were diploma entrants. Most (91.7%) of the students attended hospital internships, with 60.2% in Biosafety Level (BSL)-2 laboratories and 70.2% rotating in all the core areas of laboratory medicine. The 8.3% who did not attend any internship were under the direct entry category. Exposure to biohazards was not significantly associated with laboratory safety level and student entry category (<em>P&gt;</em> 0.05). Recommended laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the safety level of the laboratory and student entry category (<em>P&gt;</em> 0.05). Poor attitudes towards certain laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the biosafety level of the training laboratory (<em>P&gt;</em> 0.05), whereas training (<em>P</em> = 0.021) and clean-up procedures (<em>P</em> = 0.048) were associated with laboratory safety levels, respectively. The direct entrants had no access to BSL-3 laboratories, and this category of students had a negative attitude towards internship attendance. Therefore, there is a need to create a multi-channel full range laboratory biosafety and biorisk management teaching reforms based on practical application, real case studies, and laboratory simulation to be incorporated into the curriculum to benefit the direct entrant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36178,"journal":{"name":"Biosafety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053622001288/pdfft?md5=3b499411f41f781b0dadd9ac3a39e1f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590053622001288-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of biosafety and biorisk management practices among medical laboratory students in two institutions in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"John Roberts Padde ,&nbsp;Winnie Akiteng ,&nbsp;William Edema ,&nbsp;Saad Mahjub Atiku ,&nbsp;Julius Tibyangye ,&nbsp;Job Tekakwo ,&nbsp;Cosmas Andruga ,&nbsp;Derick Hope ,&nbsp;Benson Musinguzi ,&nbsp;Jean Brenda Gesa ,&nbsp;Lawrence Amadile ,&nbsp;Robert Agondua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Medical laboratory workers handle clinical specimens, which are a threat of exposure to infectious agents. Notably, medical laboratory science students report for internships with only theoretical knowledge of biosafety and biorisk management practices, predisposing them to a higher risk of laboratory hazards. In this study, we assessed the influence of entry-level students' adherence to practices and attitudes towards biosafety and biorisk management during the Internship. An online survey tool was used to explore the practices and attitudes towards laboratory biosafety and risk management. Of the 96 students, 60 (62.5%) anonymous responses were received, and of these, 60.3% were direct entrants, and 32.8% were diploma entrants. Most (91.7%) of the students attended hospital internships, with 60.2% in Biosafety Level (BSL)-2 laboratories and 70.2% rotating in all the core areas of laboratory medicine. The 8.3% who did not attend any internship were under the direct entry category. Exposure to biohazards was not significantly associated with laboratory safety level and student entry category (<em>P&gt;</em> 0.05). Recommended laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the safety level of the laboratory and student entry category (<em>P&gt;</em> 0.05). Poor attitudes towards certain laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the biosafety level of the training laboratory (<em>P&gt;</em> 0.05), whereas training (<em>P</em> = 0.021) and clean-up procedures (<em>P</em> = 0.048) were associated with laboratory safety levels, respectively. The direct entrants had no access to BSL-3 laboratories, and this category of students had a negative attitude towards internship attendance. Therefore, there is a need to create a multi-channel full range laboratory biosafety and biorisk management teaching reforms based on practical application, real case studies, and laboratory simulation to be incorporated into the curriculum to benefit the direct entrant.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosafety and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053622001288/pdfft?md5=3b499411f41f781b0dadd9ac3a39e1f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2590053622001288-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosafety and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053622001288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosafety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053622001288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学实验室工作人员处理临床标本,这是接触传染性病原体的威胁。值得注意的是,医学实验室专业的学生只有生物安全和生物风险管理实践的理论知识来报告实习,这使他们容易面临更高的实验室危害风险。在本研究中,我们评估了实习期间初级学生对生物安全和生物风险管理的依从性和态度的影响。使用在线调查工具来探讨实验室生物安全和风险管理的做法和态度。在96名学生中,收到60名(62.5%)匿名回复,其中60.3%为直接入读生,32.8%为文凭入读生。大部分(91.7%)学生在医院实习,其中60.2%在生物安全等级(BSL)-2实验室实习,70.2%在检验医学的所有核心领域轮岗。没有参加任何实习工作的8.3%属于直接入职类别。暴露于生物危害与实验室安全水平和学生入学类别没有显著相关(P>0.05)。推荐的实验室生物安全操作与实验室和学生入门类别的安全水平没有显著关联(P>0.05)。对某些实验室生物安全操作的不良态度与培训实验室的生物安全水平没有显著相关(P>0.05),而培训(P = 0.021)和清理程序(P = 0.048)分别与实验室安全水平相关。直接进入者无法进入BSL-3实验室,这类学生对实习出勤率持消极态度。因此,有必要创建一个基于实际应用、真实案例研究和实验室模拟的多渠道全方位实验室生物安全和生物风险管理教学改革,将其纳入课程中,使直接进入者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of biosafety and biorisk management practices among medical laboratory students in two institutions in Uganda

Medical laboratory workers handle clinical specimens, which are a threat of exposure to infectious agents. Notably, medical laboratory science students report for internships with only theoretical knowledge of biosafety and biorisk management practices, predisposing them to a higher risk of laboratory hazards. In this study, we assessed the influence of entry-level students' adherence to practices and attitudes towards biosafety and biorisk management during the Internship. An online survey tool was used to explore the practices and attitudes towards laboratory biosafety and risk management. Of the 96 students, 60 (62.5%) anonymous responses were received, and of these, 60.3% were direct entrants, and 32.8% were diploma entrants. Most (91.7%) of the students attended hospital internships, with 60.2% in Biosafety Level (BSL)-2 laboratories and 70.2% rotating in all the core areas of laboratory medicine. The 8.3% who did not attend any internship were under the direct entry category. Exposure to biohazards was not significantly associated with laboratory safety level and student entry category (P> 0.05). Recommended laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the safety level of the laboratory and student entry category (P> 0.05). Poor attitudes towards certain laboratory biosafety practices were not significantly associated with the biosafety level of the training laboratory (P> 0.05), whereas training (P = 0.021) and clean-up procedures (P = 0.048) were associated with laboratory safety levels, respectively. The direct entrants had no access to BSL-3 laboratories, and this category of students had a negative attitude towards internship attendance. Therefore, there is a need to create a multi-channel full range laboratory biosafety and biorisk management teaching reforms based on practical application, real case studies, and laboratory simulation to be incorporated into the curriculum to benefit the direct entrant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biosafety and Health
Biosafety and Health Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信