电化学治疗与放疗治疗原发性皮肤恶性肿瘤或原发性实体器官恶性肿瘤皮肤转移:一项系统综述和荟萃分析方案

Angus E. McMillan, Luke McElroy, L. O’Toole, P. Matteucci, J. Totty
{"title":"电化学治疗与放疗治疗原发性皮肤恶性肿瘤或原发性实体器官恶性肿瘤皮肤转移:一项系统综述和荟萃分析方案","authors":"Angus E. McMillan, Luke McElroy, L. O’Toole, P. Matteucci, J. Totty","doi":"10.1093/jsprm/snac005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Electrochemotherapy has emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of cutaneous malignancies that are unamenable to surgical resection. Despite growing recognition and recommendation in national guidelines, to date, no Level 1 evidence exists comparing its use to radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous malignancies. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be undertaken in line with the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and checklist. A comprehensive search strategy will be applied to MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov from the time period from inception to December 2021. Supplementary searches of the grey literature will also be undertaken. Studies in humans which compare treatment with electrochemotherapy to radiotherapy and report tumour response with at least a 4-week follow-up will be eligible. Studies will be included regardless of publication language or country of origin. Screening of studies and data extraction will be undertaken independently by two authors. Our primary outcome will be tumour volume response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We will also extract any secondary outcomes reported, such as patient-reported outcome measures, pain, toxicity/adverse events and progression-free survival. Included studies will be assessed for risk of bias using recognized tools. Evidence quality will be appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. If studies are of acceptable clinical homogeneity and suitable data is extracted, a meta-analysis will be performed. If adequate data are present, various subgroup analyses will be performed. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot and Egger’s test.\n PROSPERO CRD42021285415","PeriodicalId":93590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrochemotherapy vs radiotherapy in the treatment of primary cutaneous malignancies or cutaneous metastases from primary solid organ malignancies: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Angus E. McMillan, Luke McElroy, L. O’Toole, P. Matteucci, J. Totty\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsprm/snac005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Electrochemotherapy has emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of cutaneous malignancies that are unamenable to surgical resection. Despite growing recognition and recommendation in national guidelines, to date, no Level 1 evidence exists comparing its use to radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous malignancies. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be undertaken in line with the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and checklist. A comprehensive search strategy will be applied to MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov from the time period from inception to December 2021. Supplementary searches of the grey literature will also be undertaken. Studies in humans which compare treatment with electrochemotherapy to radiotherapy and report tumour response with at least a 4-week follow-up will be eligible. Studies will be included regardless of publication language or country of origin. Screening of studies and data extraction will be undertaken independently by two authors. Our primary outcome will be tumour volume response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We will also extract any secondary outcomes reported, such as patient-reported outcome measures, pain, toxicity/adverse events and progression-free survival. Included studies will be assessed for risk of bias using recognized tools. Evidence quality will be appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. If studies are of acceptable clinical homogeneity and suitable data is extracted, a meta-analysis will be performed. If adequate data are present, various subgroup analyses will be performed. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot and Egger’s test.\\n PROSPERO CRD42021285415\",\"PeriodicalId\":93590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snac005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snac005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

电化学疗法已成为治疗不能手术切除的皮肤恶性肿瘤的一种有价值的工具。尽管在国家指南中越来越多的认可和推荐,但迄今为止,尚无一级证据将其与放疗在皮肤恶性肿瘤治疗中的应用进行比较。将按照Cochrane手册和系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目声明和清单进行系统评价和荟萃分析。从启动到2021年12月,将对MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、CENTRAL和ClinicalTrials.gov采用综合搜索策略。还将对灰色文献进行补充检索。比较电化疗和放疗治疗并报告至少4周随访后肿瘤反应的人体研究将符合条件。研究将包括在内,无论出版语言或原籍国。研究筛选和数据提取将由两位作者独立进行。我们的主要结果将是根据实体瘤反应评价标准的肿瘤体积反应。我们还将提取报告的任何次要结局,如患者报告的结局测量、疼痛、毒性/不良事件和无进展生存期。纳入的研究将使用公认的工具评估偏倚风险。证据质量将采用建议分级、评估、发展和评估方法进行评估。如果研究具有可接受的临床同质性并且提取了合适的数据,则将进行荟萃分析。如果有足够的数据,将进行各种亚组分析。发表偏倚将使用漏斗图和Egger检验进行评估。普洛斯彼罗CRD42021285415
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrochemotherapy vs radiotherapy in the treatment of primary cutaneous malignancies or cutaneous metastases from primary solid organ malignancies: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Electrochemotherapy has emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of cutaneous malignancies that are unamenable to surgical resection. Despite growing recognition and recommendation in national guidelines, to date, no Level 1 evidence exists comparing its use to radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous malignancies. A systematic review and meta-analysis will be undertaken in line with the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and checklist. A comprehensive search strategy will be applied to MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov from the time period from inception to December 2021. Supplementary searches of the grey literature will also be undertaken. Studies in humans which compare treatment with electrochemotherapy to radiotherapy and report tumour response with at least a 4-week follow-up will be eligible. Studies will be included regardless of publication language or country of origin. Screening of studies and data extraction will be undertaken independently by two authors. Our primary outcome will be tumour volume response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We will also extract any secondary outcomes reported, such as patient-reported outcome measures, pain, toxicity/adverse events and progression-free survival. Included studies will be assessed for risk of bias using recognized tools. Evidence quality will be appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. If studies are of acceptable clinical homogeneity and suitable data is extracted, a meta-analysis will be performed. If adequate data are present, various subgroup analyses will be performed. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot and Egger’s test. PROSPERO CRD42021285415
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信