{"title":"用超声波解剖器解剖腋窝淋巴结有好处吗？","authors":"U. Krishnaswamy, Balachandar Kariappa Reddy, Srinivasan Yasvanth Kumar, Kathirazhagan Thulasilingam, Sivaranjani Sivakumar, Vasanth Kumar","doi":"10.4103/am.am_83_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n There are conflicting reports about the merits of an Ultrasonic Dissector for Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) in Carcinoma breasts. Ours was a retrospective study to analyse its advantages and possible disadvantages.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively analyzed the data of 86 patients who underwent (ALND Level 2 and Level 3) with Ultrasonic Dissector, for Breast Cancer, in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.\n \n \n \n There was a reduction in ALND time. ALND Level 2: 15.99 (standard deviation [SD] ±6.45) min and ALND Level 3: 21.09 (SD ± 9.25) min. Intraoperative blood loss was minimal at <25 mL, no instances of reactionary hemorrhage, wound, or flap complications.\n \n \n \n There was a reduction in operative time, incidence of seroma and postoperative pain, with no instances of reactionary hemorrhage, hematoma, wound and flap complications.\n","PeriodicalId":34670,"journal":{"name":"Apollo Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection by Ultrasonic Dissector Advantageous?\",\"authors\":\"U. Krishnaswamy, Balachandar Kariappa Reddy, Srinivasan Yasvanth Kumar, Kathirazhagan Thulasilingam, Sivaranjani Sivakumar, Vasanth Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/am.am_83_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n There are conflicting reports about the merits of an Ultrasonic Dissector for Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) in Carcinoma breasts. Ours was a retrospective study to analyse its advantages and possible disadvantages.\\n \\n \\n \\n We retrospectively analyzed the data of 86 patients who underwent (ALND Level 2 and Level 3) with Ultrasonic Dissector, for Breast Cancer, in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n There was a reduction in ALND time. ALND Level 2: 15.99 (standard deviation [SD] ±6.45) min and ALND Level 3: 21.09 (SD ± 9.25) min. Intraoperative blood loss was minimal at <25 mL, no instances of reactionary hemorrhage, wound, or flap complications.\\n \\n \\n \\n There was a reduction in operative time, incidence of seroma and postoperative pain, with no instances of reactionary hemorrhage, hematoma, wound and flap complications.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apollo Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apollo Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_83_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apollo Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_83_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Axillary Lymph Node Dissection by Ultrasonic Dissector Advantageous?
There are conflicting reports about the merits of an Ultrasonic Dissector for Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) in Carcinoma breasts. Ours was a retrospective study to analyse its advantages and possible disadvantages.
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 86 patients who underwent (ALND Level 2 and Level 3) with Ultrasonic Dissector, for Breast Cancer, in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
There was a reduction in ALND time. ALND Level 2: 15.99 (standard deviation [SD] ±6.45) min and ALND Level 3: 21.09 (SD ± 9.25) min. Intraoperative blood loss was minimal at <25 mL, no instances of reactionary hemorrhage, wound, or flap complications.
There was a reduction in operative time, incidence of seroma and postoperative pain, with no instances of reactionary hemorrhage, hematoma, wound and flap complications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
