今天是3月11日。让我们尝试以不同的方式抗击Covid。你会怎么做?

IF 0.2 Q4 BIOLOGY
Shrey Jain
{"title":"今天是3月11日。让我们尝试以不同的方式抗击Covid。你会怎么做?","authors":"Shrey Jain","doi":"10.33137/JULS.V15I1.36205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suppose you have the ability to go back to March 11th of 2020 -  the date the WHO officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic1. \nWhat could have been done differently with respect to digital health product development? \nWere domain experts utilized to the best of their abilities? What can we learn from COVID-19 for future public health crises planning? \nDigital health data is now, more than ever, deeply influencing our lives. Having robust digital health tools to support public health surveillance is no longer a problem for technocrats. \nIt’s everyone’s business now. \nThrough the COVID-19 pandemic, I had the opportunity to lead a digital health startup, Flatten.ca, that focused on collecting symptom data from people in Canada and in Somalia2. This experience led to collaborations with big-tech companies, researchers, government officials, startups, and investors. \nReflecting back on my experiences, I see many flaws in the process by which the North-American community decided to develop and deploy digital health tools. Simply put, a lack of speed and strategically allocated domain expertise hindered our success. Why did Canada take 5 months to launch a contact tracing app and Singapore only 10 days? \nThis perspective piece aims at answering the questions highlighted above and analyzing the North-American response to build digital health tools as the COVID-19 pandemic rages on. Whether you’re an investor, academic, student, founder, or otherwise involved in the digital health industry, and you’re thinking about how to effectively support product development for future public health crises, this can help better inform where your efforts are best spent.","PeriodicalId":40102,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Undergraduate Life Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REPLAY: It’s March 11th. Let’s try to fight Covid differently. How would you do it?\",\"authors\":\"Shrey Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/JULS.V15I1.36205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Suppose you have the ability to go back to March 11th of 2020 -  the date the WHO officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic1. \\nWhat could have been done differently with respect to digital health product development? \\nWere domain experts utilized to the best of their abilities? What can we learn from COVID-19 for future public health crises planning? \\nDigital health data is now, more than ever, deeply influencing our lives. Having robust digital health tools to support public health surveillance is no longer a problem for technocrats. \\nIt’s everyone’s business now. \\nThrough the COVID-19 pandemic, I had the opportunity to lead a digital health startup, Flatten.ca, that focused on collecting symptom data from people in Canada and in Somalia2. This experience led to collaborations with big-tech companies, researchers, government officials, startups, and investors. \\nReflecting back on my experiences, I see many flaws in the process by which the North-American community decided to develop and deploy digital health tools. Simply put, a lack of speed and strategically allocated domain expertise hindered our success. Why did Canada take 5 months to launch a contact tracing app and Singapore only 10 days? \\nThis perspective piece aims at answering the questions highlighted above and analyzing the North-American response to build digital health tools as the COVID-19 pandemic rages on. Whether you’re an investor, academic, student, founder, or otherwise involved in the digital health industry, and you’re thinking about how to effectively support product development for future public health crises, this can help better inform where your efforts are best spent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Undergraduate Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Undergraduate Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/JULS.V15I1.36205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Undergraduate Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/JULS.V15I1.36205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假设你有能力回到2020年3月11日——世界卫生组织正式宣布COVID-19大流行的日期。在数字健康产品开发方面,本可以做些什么不同的事情?领域专家是否充分发挥了他们的能力?我们可以从COVID-19中学到什么,以指导未来的公共卫生危机规划?数字健康数据现在比以往任何时候都更深刻地影响着我们的生活。对于技术官僚来说,拥有强大的数字卫生工具来支持公共卫生监测不再是一个问题。现在这是每个人的事。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,我有机会领导一家数字健康初创公司Flatten。该项目专注于收集加拿大和索马里人的症状数据。这段经历让我与大型科技公司、研究人员、政府官员、初创公司和投资者合作。回顾我的经历,我发现北美社区在决定开发和部署数字卫生工具的过程中存在许多缺陷。简单地说,缺乏速度和战略性分配的领域专业知识阻碍了我们的成功。为什么加拿大用了5个月才推出接触者追踪应用,而新加坡只用了10天?这篇透视文章旨在回答上述问题,并分析北美在COVID-19大流行肆虐之际建立数字卫生工具的反应。无论您是投资者、学者、学生、创始人,还是数字健康行业的其他参与者,如果您正在考虑如何有效地支持未来公共卫生危机的产品开发,这都可以帮助您更好地了解您的努力应该花在哪里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
REPLAY: It’s March 11th. Let’s try to fight Covid differently. How would you do it?
Suppose you have the ability to go back to March 11th of 2020 -  the date the WHO officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic1. What could have been done differently with respect to digital health product development? Were domain experts utilized to the best of their abilities? What can we learn from COVID-19 for future public health crises planning? Digital health data is now, more than ever, deeply influencing our lives. Having robust digital health tools to support public health surveillance is no longer a problem for technocrats. It’s everyone’s business now. Through the COVID-19 pandemic, I had the opportunity to lead a digital health startup, Flatten.ca, that focused on collecting symptom data from people in Canada and in Somalia2. This experience led to collaborations with big-tech companies, researchers, government officials, startups, and investors. Reflecting back on my experiences, I see many flaws in the process by which the North-American community decided to develop and deploy digital health tools. Simply put, a lack of speed and strategically allocated domain expertise hindered our success. Why did Canada take 5 months to launch a contact tracing app and Singapore only 10 days? This perspective piece aims at answering the questions highlighted above and analyzing the North-American response to build digital health tools as the COVID-19 pandemic rages on. Whether you’re an investor, academic, student, founder, or otherwise involved in the digital health industry, and you’re thinking about how to effectively support product development for future public health crises, this can help better inform where your efforts are best spent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信