多元文化主义:隐姓埋名的多样性还是无关紧要的多样性?

IF 11.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Helen H. Chung, Anne E. Kato
{"title":"多元文化主义:隐姓埋名的多样性还是无关紧要的多样性?","authors":"Helen H. Chung, Anne E. Kato","doi":"10.1017/iop.2023.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Valenzuela and Bernardo (2023) propose the benefits of adopting a polycultural framework for diversity management in organizations. On the surface, the authors offer a diversity incognito approach, where a commitment to diversity drives organizational practice but is not readily visible or marked by pro-diversity language and labels. It is a seemingly attractive approach, particularly because it could mitigate defensive routines related to the experience of identity threat (Dover et al., 2020; Leslie et al., 2020). However, it also has some real limitations that may short-circuit the goals of diversity management. We discuss the benefits alongside the critical challenges that ultimately limit the use of polyculturalism.","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"398 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polyculturalism: Diversity incognito or diversity made irrelevant?\",\"authors\":\"Helen H. Chung, Anne E. Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2023.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Valenzuela and Bernardo (2023) propose the benefits of adopting a polycultural framework for diversity management in organizations. On the surface, the authors offer a diversity incognito approach, where a commitment to diversity drives organizational practice but is not readily visible or marked by pro-diversity language and labels. It is a seemingly attractive approach, particularly because it could mitigate defensive routines related to the experience of identity threat (Dover et al., 2020; Leslie et al., 2020). However, it also has some real limitations that may short-circuit the goals of diversity management. We discuss the benefits alongside the critical challenges that ultimately limit the use of polyculturalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"398 - 400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.45\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.45","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Valenzuela和Bernardo(2023)提出了在组织中采用多文化多样性管理框架的好处。从表面上看,作者提供了一种隐姓埋名的多样性方法,对多样性的承诺推动了组织实践,但并不容易被支持多样性的语言和标签所看到或标记。这似乎是一种有吸引力的方法,特别是因为它可以减轻与身份威胁体验相关的防御常规(Dover等人,2020;Leslie等人,2020)。然而,它也有一些实际的局限性,可能会缩短多样性管理的目标。我们讨论了最终限制多元文化主义使用的好处和关键挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polyculturalism: Diversity incognito or diversity made irrelevant?
Valenzuela and Bernardo (2023) propose the benefits of adopting a polycultural framework for diversity management in organizations. On the surface, the authors offer a diversity incognito approach, where a commitment to diversity drives organizational practice but is not readily visible or marked by pro-diversity language and labels. It is a seemingly attractive approach, particularly because it could mitigate defensive routines related to the experience of identity threat (Dover et al., 2020; Leslie et al., 2020). However, it also has some real limitations that may short-circuit the goals of diversity management. We discuss the benefits alongside the critical challenges that ultimately limit the use of polyculturalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
10.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice is a peer-reviewed academic journal published on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. The journal focuses on interactive exchanges on topics of importance to the science and practice of the field. It features articles that present new ideas or different takes on existing ideas, stimulating dialogue about important issues in the field. Additionally, the journal is indexed and abstracted in Clarivate Analytics SSCI, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信