Tahl Å l Muhtaw Å  Wa Mustaw Å  As'ilat Ikhtib Å  R Å  T Al Loughah Al †˜ Arabiyah Li Imtih Å  N Al Madrasah'al Å  Al Ma 'Å  Y ł r Al Wathaniyyah'al ł  Ith Å  R Al Manhaj 2013

M. Natsir
{"title":"Tahl Å l Muhtaw Å  Wa Mustaw Å  As'ilat Ikhtib Å  R Å  T Al Loughah Al †˜ Arabiyah Li Imtih Å  N Al Madrasah'al Å  Al Ma 'Å  Y ł r Al Wathaniyyah'al ł  Ith Å  R Al Manhaj 2013","authors":"M. Natsir","doi":"10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe 2013 curriculum demands a paradigm shift in learning, process, and evaluation, including in HOTS, MOTS, LOTS-based assessments. Using an evaluative research design, this study aims to analyze the Arabic language test items in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah under LP. Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara for the Academic Year 2018/2019. The analysis includes the design and approach used in preparing the test, the content (materials) of the test, and the categorization of the quality level of the test items in the 2013 Curriculum, i.e. HOTS, MOTS, or LOTS. The results showed that: first, the approach used in preparing the test was an integrative approach for multiple-choice test questions and a discrete-point test approach for essay test questions. Second, the content of the test included Arab and Indonesian culture and civilization, Muslim figures, language level, language rules, and sentence structure. Third, Arabic language test questions in UAMBN covered HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS questions. In the multiple-choice questions, 11 questions (27.5%) were included in the LOTS category, 10 questions (25%) in the MOTS category, and 19 questions (47.5%) in the HOTS category. Meanwhile, the essay questions, which presented 4 questions (80%) for the HOTS category and 1 question (20%) for the MOTS category, were considered less proportional. Overall, the format for the Arabic test in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah has been proportional because it has accommodated questions with the HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS categories. \n ","PeriodicalId":55722,"journal":{"name":"Alsinatuna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TahlÄ«l Muhtawā wa Mustawā As'ilat Ikhtibārāt Al-Lughah Al ‘Arabiyah Li Imtihān Al Madrasah 'alā al Ma'āyÄ«r Al Wathaniyyah 'alā Ithār Al Manhaj 2013\",\"authors\":\"M. Natsir\",\"doi\":\"10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThe 2013 curriculum demands a paradigm shift in learning, process, and evaluation, including in HOTS, MOTS, LOTS-based assessments. Using an evaluative research design, this study aims to analyze the Arabic language test items in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah under LP. Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara for the Academic Year 2018/2019. The analysis includes the design and approach used in preparing the test, the content (materials) of the test, and the categorization of the quality level of the test items in the 2013 Curriculum, i.e. HOTS, MOTS, or LOTS. The results showed that: first, the approach used in preparing the test was an integrative approach for multiple-choice test questions and a discrete-point test approach for essay test questions. Second, the content of the test included Arab and Indonesian culture and civilization, Muslim figures, language level, language rules, and sentence structure. Third, Arabic language test questions in UAMBN covered HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS questions. In the multiple-choice questions, 11 questions (27.5%) were included in the LOTS category, 10 questions (25%) in the MOTS category, and 19 questions (47.5%) in the HOTS category. Meanwhile, the essay questions, which presented 4 questions (80%) for the HOTS category and 1 question (20%) for the MOTS category, were considered less proportional. Overall, the format for the Arabic test in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah has been proportional because it has accommodated questions with the HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS categories. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":55722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alsinatuna\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alsinatuna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alsinatuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要2013年的课程要求在学习、过程和评估方面进行范式转变,包括基于HOTS、MOTS和LOTS的评估。采用评价研究设计,本研究旨在分析LP下UAMBN宗教学校的阿拉伯语测试项目。Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara 2018/2019学年。分析包括准备考试时使用的设计和方法、考试内容(材料)以及2013年课程中考试项目(即HOTS、MOTS或LOTS)的质量水平分类。结果表明:第一,选择题的备考方法是综合性的,作文题的备试方法是离散点测试。其次,测试内容包括阿拉伯和印尼文化和文明、穆斯林人物、语言水平、语言规则和句子结构。UAMBN的阿拉伯语测试题包括HOTS、MOTS和LOTS。在多项选择题中,LOTS类有11道题(27.5%),MOTS类有10道题(25%),HOTS类有19道题(47.5%)。同时,论文问题被认为比例较低,其中HOTS类别有4个问题(80%),MOTS类别有1个问题(20%)。总的来说,UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah阿拉伯语考试的形式是成比例的,因为它包含了HOTS、MOTS和LOTS类别的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tahlīl Muhtawā wa Mustawā As'ilat Ikhtibārāt Al-Lughah Al ‘Arabiyah Li Imtihān Al Madrasah 'alā al Ma'āyīr Al Wathaniyyah 'alā Ithār Al Manhaj 2013
Abstract The 2013 curriculum demands a paradigm shift in learning, process, and evaluation, including in HOTS, MOTS, LOTS-based assessments. Using an evaluative research design, this study aims to analyze the Arabic language test items in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah under LP. Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara for the Academic Year 2018/2019. The analysis includes the design and approach used in preparing the test, the content (materials) of the test, and the categorization of the quality level of the test items in the 2013 Curriculum, i.e. HOTS, MOTS, or LOTS. The results showed that: first, the approach used in preparing the test was an integrative approach for multiple-choice test questions and a discrete-point test approach for essay test questions. Second, the content of the test included Arab and Indonesian culture and civilization, Muslim figures, language level, language rules, and sentence structure. Third, Arabic language test questions in UAMBN covered HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS questions. In the multiple-choice questions, 11 questions (27.5%) were included in the LOTS category, 10 questions (25%) in the MOTS category, and 19 questions (47.5%) in the HOTS category. Meanwhile, the essay questions, which presented 4 questions (80%) for the HOTS category and 1 question (20%) for the MOTS category, were considered less proportional. Overall, the format for the Arabic test in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah has been proportional because it has accommodated questions with the HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS categories.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信