新冠肺炎疫情期间影响高校教师教学信念的因素

Q2 Social Sciences
W. Hsu
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情期间影响高校教师教学信念的因素","authors":"W. Hsu","doi":"10.33788/rcis.78.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taiwanese university educators’ efficacy is traditionally associated with the belief in aligning teaching and learning outcomes. However, existing research on teacher efficacy involving modern university educators is limited. We bridge this gap by exploring university educators’ perceived efficacy and the factors that influence those perceptions. We surveyed teachers from a national university in southern Taiwan using the Teacher Efficacy Scale and interviews about the source of efficacy beliefs. We obtained 74 survey responses and descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were performed. During the interviews, four qualitative data sets were collected, and we analyzed the data using a continuous comparison analysis method. Generally, participants had medium- to high-levels of perceived efficacy; however, levels differed by gender. Efficacy scores were also higher in course design, technology usage, and classroom management, compared to instructional strategies and learning assessments. The main sources of efficacy perception included mastery experience, role models, student-teacher relationship, professional growth, and student support. Our findings suggest several strategies for follow-up research to promote university educators’ sense of efficacy.","PeriodicalId":45087,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing the Teaching Beliefs of University Faculty Members during Covid-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"W. Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.33788/rcis.78.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taiwanese university educators’ efficacy is traditionally associated with the belief in aligning teaching and learning outcomes. However, existing research on teacher efficacy involving modern university educators is limited. We bridge this gap by exploring university educators’ perceived efficacy and the factors that influence those perceptions. We surveyed teachers from a national university in southern Taiwan using the Teacher Efficacy Scale and interviews about the source of efficacy beliefs. We obtained 74 survey responses and descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were performed. During the interviews, four qualitative data sets were collected, and we analyzed the data using a continuous comparison analysis method. Generally, participants had medium- to high-levels of perceived efficacy; however, levels differed by gender. Efficacy scores were also higher in course design, technology usage, and classroom management, compared to instructional strategies and learning assessments. The main sources of efficacy perception included mastery experience, role models, student-teacher relationship, professional growth, and student support. Our findings suggest several strategies for follow-up research to promote university educators’ sense of efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.78.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.78.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,台湾大学教育工作者的效能感与教学和学习结果相一致的信念有关。然而,现有涉及现代大学教育工作者的教师效能感研究是有限的。我们通过探索大学教育工作者的感知效能和影响这些感知的因素来弥合这一差距。本研究以台湾南部一所国立大学的教师为研究对象,采用教师效能感量表及访谈方式,探讨效能信念的来源。我们获得了74份调查回复,并进行了描述性统计和方差分析。在访谈过程中,我们收集了四个定性数据集,并使用连续比较分析方法对数据进行了分析。一般来说,参与者具有中等至高水平的感知效能;然而,不同性别的水平不同。与教学策略和学习评估相比,在课程设计、技术使用和课堂管理方面的有效性得分也更高。效能感的主要来源包括掌握经验、榜样、师生关系、专业成长和学生支持。我们的研究结果为后续研究提出了几种策略,以提高大学教育工作者的效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing the Teaching Beliefs of University Faculty Members during Covid-19 Pandemic
Taiwanese university educators’ efficacy is traditionally associated with the belief in aligning teaching and learning outcomes. However, existing research on teacher efficacy involving modern university educators is limited. We bridge this gap by exploring university educators’ perceived efficacy and the factors that influence those perceptions. We surveyed teachers from a national university in southern Taiwan using the Teacher Efficacy Scale and interviews about the source of efficacy beliefs. We obtained 74 survey responses and descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were performed. During the interviews, four qualitative data sets were collected, and we analyzed the data using a continuous comparison analysis method. Generally, participants had medium- to high-levels of perceived efficacy; however, levels differed by gender. Efficacy scores were also higher in course design, technology usage, and classroom management, compared to instructional strategies and learning assessments. The main sources of efficacy perception included mastery experience, role models, student-teacher relationship, professional growth, and student support. Our findings suggest several strategies for follow-up research to promote university educators’ sense of efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala
Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信