大学生学习评估问卷的验证

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Pulido, J. Rodríguez, María Victoria Aguiar Perera
{"title":"大学生学习评估问卷的验证","authors":"J. Pulido, J. Rodríguez, María Victoria Aguiar Perera","doi":"10.18172/CON.4504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the learning of university students based on the use of strategies and / or approaches, the distribution of study times, resources, etc.; that is, we want to know how the students approach and manage the study to obtain the academic performance they hope to achieve. The objective of this study was to design and analyze the validity of a questionnaire that meets the methodological requirements and psychometric requirements to assess the coping of learning in university students. The validation of the instrument has been carried out through expert judgment and confirmatory factor analysis of the theoretical model, with the factorial structure of this tool being reliable and with a good fit. The analyzes carried out have confirmed and demonstrated the dimensions or problems in the learning of the university student: methodological strategy, progress of the results, educational and learning environments, organization of the times, attributions in the results. The final result was a questionnaire made up of 30 items in which they are assessed on a Likert-type scale, with five response options, being 1 = “Strongly disagree” and 5 = “Strongly agree”.","PeriodicalId":43289,"journal":{"name":"Contextos Educativos-Revista de Educacion","volume":"1 1","pages":"105-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validación de un cuestionario para la evaluación del aprendizaje en el alumno universitario\",\"authors\":\"J. Pulido, J. Rodríguez, María Victoria Aguiar Perera\",\"doi\":\"10.18172/CON.4504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article addresses the learning of university students based on the use of strategies and / or approaches, the distribution of study times, resources, etc.; that is, we want to know how the students approach and manage the study to obtain the academic performance they hope to achieve. The objective of this study was to design and analyze the validity of a questionnaire that meets the methodological requirements and psychometric requirements to assess the coping of learning in university students. The validation of the instrument has been carried out through expert judgment and confirmatory factor analysis of the theoretical model, with the factorial structure of this tool being reliable and with a good fit. The analyzes carried out have confirmed and demonstrated the dimensions or problems in the learning of the university student: methodological strategy, progress of the results, educational and learning environments, organization of the times, attributions in the results. The final result was a questionnaire made up of 30 items in which they are assessed on a Likert-type scale, with five response options, being 1 = “Strongly disagree” and 5 = “Strongly agree”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contextos Educativos-Revista de Educacion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"105-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contextos Educativos-Revista de Educacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18172/CON.4504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contextos Educativos-Revista de Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18172/CON.4504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从策略和/或方法的使用、学习时间和资源的分配等方面论述了大学生的学习。;也就是说,我们想知道学生如何处理和管理学习,以获得他们希望达到的学习成绩。本研究的目的是设计和分析一份符合方法学要求和心理测量学要求的问卷的有效性,以评估大学生的学习应对能力。通过专家判断和理论模型的验证性因子分析,对该工具进行了验证,该工具的因子结构可靠,拟合良好。所进行的分析证实并证明了大学生学习中的维度或问题:方法论策略、结果的进展、教育和学习环境、时代的组织、结果的归因。最终结果是一份由30个项目组成的问卷,其中他们以Likert型量表进行评估,有五个回答选项,分别为1=“强烈不同意”和5=“强烈同意”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validación de un cuestionario para la evaluación del aprendizaje en el alumno universitario
This article addresses the learning of university students based on the use of strategies and / or approaches, the distribution of study times, resources, etc.; that is, we want to know how the students approach and manage the study to obtain the academic performance they hope to achieve. The objective of this study was to design and analyze the validity of a questionnaire that meets the methodological requirements and psychometric requirements to assess the coping of learning in university students. The validation of the instrument has been carried out through expert judgment and confirmatory factor analysis of the theoretical model, with the factorial structure of this tool being reliable and with a good fit. The analyzes carried out have confirmed and demonstrated the dimensions or problems in the learning of the university student: methodological strategy, progress of the results, educational and learning environments, organization of the times, attributions in the results. The final result was a questionnaire made up of 30 items in which they are assessed on a Likert-type scale, with five response options, being 1 = “Strongly disagree” and 5 = “Strongly agree”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contextos Educativos-Revista de Educacion
Contextos Educativos-Revista de Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信