{"title":"《婆罗洲疗愈罗曼史:仪式故事讲述与苏吉萨基特》,克利福德·萨瑟的《萨里巴斯-伊班疗愈仪式》(评论)","authors":"Kamal Solhaimi Fadzil","doi":"10.1353/ras.2021.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a nationalist leader who dared to challenge the West. He made Indonesians proud (p. 441). In terms of historical figure research, the cases provided in this book are thought-provoking. Jose Rizal, a significant historical figure in the history of the Philippines, is an awkward person in the scholarship of Malaysian and Indonesian studies. On the one hand, Filipino scholars are clear that one dimension of his nationalist identity is ‘Malay’. On the other hand, many studies on Malayness in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and Singapore, intentionally or unintentionally ignore the case of the Philippines. Rommel A. Curaming’s study of Rizal enriches our understanding of Malayness: an image of a non-Muslim, Christian Malay leader. Ramon Guillermo elaborated Tan Malaka’s account of Andreas Bonifacio, another Filipino leader, recognised as a proletarian leader and ‘pure Indonesian’ (p. 424). From Thum Ping Tjin’s in-depth study of Lim Chin Siong, we have a good reference for academic researchers to study leftist political leaders. Thum’s penetration through several sources of historical material and his articulation of Lim's political ideas sheds light in dealing with the ideological development of the left-wing political parties and leaders in Singapore and Malaya. Teo Lee Ken discussed Usman Awang’s poems in the context of Malaysian politics. While the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) leadership advocated Malay political primacy and Malay economic privilege as a notion of justice, Usman Awang’s poetry has repeatedly highlighted that justice should instead be based on political equality (p. 236). Southeast Asia has attracted much attention as a region worthy of study in recent years. The geographical scope of Nusantara mentioned in this book is Peninsular Malaya, Borneo, Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippines. Brunei is absent while there is only one article related to Sarawak. What the book does is to re-examine the linkages of Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines in the context of the historical consciousness of the 1950s and 1960s, bringing to light aspects which have been neglected in history left-wing history, anti-colonialist struggles and ethnic tensions in the new nation-states.","PeriodicalId":39524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","volume":"94 1","pages":"236 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Borneo Healing Romance: Ritual Storytelling and the Sugi Sakit, A Saribas Iban Rite of Healing by Clifford Sather (review)\",\"authors\":\"Kamal Solhaimi Fadzil\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ras.2021.0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"a nationalist leader who dared to challenge the West. He made Indonesians proud (p. 441). In terms of historical figure research, the cases provided in this book are thought-provoking. Jose Rizal, a significant historical figure in the history of the Philippines, is an awkward person in the scholarship of Malaysian and Indonesian studies. On the one hand, Filipino scholars are clear that one dimension of his nationalist identity is ‘Malay’. On the other hand, many studies on Malayness in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and Singapore, intentionally or unintentionally ignore the case of the Philippines. Rommel A. Curaming’s study of Rizal enriches our understanding of Malayness: an image of a non-Muslim, Christian Malay leader. Ramon Guillermo elaborated Tan Malaka’s account of Andreas Bonifacio, another Filipino leader, recognised as a proletarian leader and ‘pure Indonesian’ (p. 424). From Thum Ping Tjin’s in-depth study of Lim Chin Siong, we have a good reference for academic researchers to study leftist political leaders. Thum’s penetration through several sources of historical material and his articulation of Lim's political ideas sheds light in dealing with the ideological development of the left-wing political parties and leaders in Singapore and Malaya. Teo Lee Ken discussed Usman Awang’s poems in the context of Malaysian politics. While the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) leadership advocated Malay political primacy and Malay economic privilege as a notion of justice, Usman Awang’s poetry has repeatedly highlighted that justice should instead be based on political equality (p. 236). Southeast Asia has attracted much attention as a region worthy of study in recent years. The geographical scope of Nusantara mentioned in this book is Peninsular Malaya, Borneo, Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippines. Brunei is absent while there is only one article related to Sarawak. What the book does is to re-examine the linkages of Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines in the context of the historical consciousness of the 1950s and 1960s, bringing to light aspects which have been neglected in history left-wing history, anti-colonialist struggles and ethnic tensions in the new nation-states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"236 - 238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2021.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
敢于挑战西方的民族主义领袖他使印度尼西亚人感到骄傲(第441页)。在历史人物研究方面,本书提供的案例发人深省。Jose Rizal是菲律宾历史上重要的历史人物,在马来西亚和印度尼西亚的学术研究中是一个尴尬的人。一方面,菲律宾学者很清楚,他的民族主义身份的一个方面是“马来人”。另一方面,印度尼西亚、马来西亚、文莱和新加坡的许多马来人性研究有意无意地忽略了菲律宾的情况。隆美尔·库拉明对黎刹的研究丰富了我们对马来西亚人的理解:黎刹是一个非穆斯林、基督教的马来领袖形象。Ramon Guillermo详细阐述了Tan Malaka对另一位菲律宾领导人Andreas Bonifacio的描述,他被认为是无产阶级领袖和“纯粹的印度尼西亚人”(第424页)。从覃平津对林清祥的深入研究中,我们可以为学术研究者研究左派政治领袖提供很好的参考。图姆通过对多个历史材料来源的解读,以及他对林的政治理念的阐述,为我们解读新加坡和马来亚左翼政党及其领导人的意识形态发展提供了一些启示。Teo Lee Ken在马来西亚政治的背景下讨论了乌斯曼·阿旺的诗歌。马来人民族统一组织(巫统)的领导层主张马来人的政治优先和马来人的经济特权是一种正义的概念,而乌斯曼·阿旺的诗歌则反复强调正义应该建立在政治平等的基础上(236页)。近年来,东南亚作为一个值得研究的地区备受关注。书中提到的努沙达拉的地理范围是马来亚半岛、婆罗洲、印度尼西亚、新加坡、菲律宾。文莱没有,只有一篇与沙捞越有关的文章。这本书所做的是在20世纪50年代和60年代的历史意识背景下重新审视马来西亚、新加坡、印度尼西亚和菲律宾之间的联系,揭示了历史上被忽视的方面左翼历史、反殖民主义斗争和新兴民族国家的种族紧张关系。
A Borneo Healing Romance: Ritual Storytelling and the Sugi Sakit, A Saribas Iban Rite of Healing by Clifford Sather (review)
a nationalist leader who dared to challenge the West. He made Indonesians proud (p. 441). In terms of historical figure research, the cases provided in this book are thought-provoking. Jose Rizal, a significant historical figure in the history of the Philippines, is an awkward person in the scholarship of Malaysian and Indonesian studies. On the one hand, Filipino scholars are clear that one dimension of his nationalist identity is ‘Malay’. On the other hand, many studies on Malayness in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and Singapore, intentionally or unintentionally ignore the case of the Philippines. Rommel A. Curaming’s study of Rizal enriches our understanding of Malayness: an image of a non-Muslim, Christian Malay leader. Ramon Guillermo elaborated Tan Malaka’s account of Andreas Bonifacio, another Filipino leader, recognised as a proletarian leader and ‘pure Indonesian’ (p. 424). From Thum Ping Tjin’s in-depth study of Lim Chin Siong, we have a good reference for academic researchers to study leftist political leaders. Thum’s penetration through several sources of historical material and his articulation of Lim's political ideas sheds light in dealing with the ideological development of the left-wing political parties and leaders in Singapore and Malaya. Teo Lee Ken discussed Usman Awang’s poems in the context of Malaysian politics. While the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) leadership advocated Malay political primacy and Malay economic privilege as a notion of justice, Usman Awang’s poetry has repeatedly highlighted that justice should instead be based on political equality (p. 236). Southeast Asia has attracted much attention as a region worthy of study in recent years. The geographical scope of Nusantara mentioned in this book is Peninsular Malaya, Borneo, Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippines. Brunei is absent while there is only one article related to Sarawak. What the book does is to re-examine the linkages of Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines in the context of the historical consciousness of the 1950s and 1960s, bringing to light aspects which have been neglected in history left-wing history, anti-colonialist struggles and ethnic tensions in the new nation-states.