货币作为制度与货币作为客体

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1515/jso-2020-0028

F. Guala

{"title":"货币作为制度与货币作为客体","authors":"F. Guala","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The folk conception of money as an object is not a promising starting point to develop general, explanatory metaphysical accounts of the social world. A theory of institutions as rules in equilibrium is more consistent with scientific theories of money, is able to shed light on the folk view, and side-steps some unnecessary puzzles.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"6 1","pages":"265 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0028","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Money as an Institution and Money as an Object\",\"authors\":\"F. Guala\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jso-2020-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The folk conception of money as an object is not a promising starting point to develop general, explanatory metaphysical accounts of the social world. A theory of institutions as rules in equilibrium is more consistent with scientific theories of money, is able to shed light on the folk view, and side-steps some unnecessary puzzles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Ontology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"265 - 279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0028\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Ontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Ontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要民间将金钱视为一种客体的概念并不是发展对社会世界的一般性、解释性形而上学描述的一个有希望的起点。制度作为均衡规则的理论更符合科学的货币理论，能够揭示民间观点，并回避一些不必要的困惑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Money as an Institution and Money as an Object

Abstract The folk conception of money as an object is not a promising starting point to develop general, explanatory metaphysical accounts of the social world. A theory of institutions as rules in equilibrium is more consistent with scientific theories of money, is able to shed light on the folk view, and side-steps some unnecessary puzzles.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Social Ontology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks