黎巴嫩市场有机柠檬和黄瓜酚类含量、农药残留及生物活性评价

IF 1 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jana Dwaidy, Dina Cheaib, A. Jammoul, N. Darra
{"title":"黎巴嫩市场有机柠檬和黄瓜酚类含量、农药残留及生物活性评价","authors":"Jana Dwaidy, Dina Cheaib, A. Jammoul, N. Darra","doi":"10.1108/NFS-01-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to evaluate the safety and quality of organic food product versus conventional ones in the Lebanese market.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSelected organic and conventional Lemon and cucumber were assessed for the presence of pesticides residues using LC-MS/MS and GC/MS/MS, also compared at the level of total polyphenols content, flavonoids, tannins and tested for their antiradical and antibacterial activities.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings indicate that organic lemons were contaminated by four types of pesticide residues (33.33%), while one pesticide residue (22.22%) was detected in conventional one, which were all below the European Union Maximum Residue Limits. For cucumber, six pesticide residues (66.66%) were detected in organic samples, while in conventional, eight pesticide residues (55.55%) were detected. However, absolutely four samples (44.44%) in each of conventional and organic cucumber samples surpass the maximum residue levels. Both lemon and cucumber, regardless of the farming systems, possess potent antioxidant activity with no significant difference, except for lemon, where total polyphenol was highly significant in conventional. Additionally, this study showed that lemon of conventional origin was slightly more effective in inhibiting the growth of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains compared to organic samples, while both cucumber types did not exert any antibacterial effect.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first paper to assess the polyphenols, pesticide residue and biological activities of organic lemon and cucumber in Lebanese market as well as comparing conventional to organic.\n","PeriodicalId":19376,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Food Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of phenolic content, pesticide residue and biological activities of organic lemon and cucumber in Lebanese market\",\"authors\":\"Jana Dwaidy, Dina Cheaib, A. Jammoul, N. Darra\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/NFS-01-2021-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to evaluate the safety and quality of organic food product versus conventional ones in the Lebanese market.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nSelected organic and conventional Lemon and cucumber were assessed for the presence of pesticides residues using LC-MS/MS and GC/MS/MS, also compared at the level of total polyphenols content, flavonoids, tannins and tested for their antiradical and antibacterial activities.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings indicate that organic lemons were contaminated by four types of pesticide residues (33.33%), while one pesticide residue (22.22%) was detected in conventional one, which were all below the European Union Maximum Residue Limits. For cucumber, six pesticide residues (66.66%) were detected in organic samples, while in conventional, eight pesticide residues (55.55%) were detected. However, absolutely four samples (44.44%) in each of conventional and organic cucumber samples surpass the maximum residue levels. Both lemon and cucumber, regardless of the farming systems, possess potent antioxidant activity with no significant difference, except for lemon, where total polyphenol was highly significant in conventional. Additionally, this study showed that lemon of conventional origin was slightly more effective in inhibiting the growth of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains compared to organic samples, while both cucumber types did not exert any antibacterial effect.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis is the first paper to assess the polyphenols, pesticide residue and biological activities of organic lemon and cucumber in Lebanese market as well as comparing conventional to organic.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Food Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-01-2021-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-01-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估黎巴嫩市场上有机食品与传统食品的安全性和质量。设计/方法/方法使用LC-MS/MS和GC/MS评估选定的有机和传统柠檬和黄瓜是否存在农药残留,并在总多酚含量、类黄酮、单宁水平上进行比较,并测试其抗自由基和抗菌活性。调查结果表明,有机柠檬被四种农药残留污染(33.33%),而传统柠檬中检测到一种农药残留(22.22%),均低于欧盟最高残留限量。在黄瓜中,有机样品中检测到6种农药残留(66.66%),而在常规样品中,检测到8种农药残留,占55.55%。然而,在常规和有机黄瓜样品中,每个样品中绝对有四个样品(44.44%)超过了最大残留水平。柠檬和黄瓜,无论耕作制度如何,都具有强大的抗氧化活性,没有显著差异,除了柠檬,柠檬中的总多酚在传统农业中非常显著。此外,这项研究表明,与有机样品相比,传统来源的柠檬在抑制革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌株生长方面略为有效,而这两种黄瓜类型都没有发挥任何抗菌作用。独创性/价值这是第一篇评估黎巴嫩市场上有机柠檬和黄瓜的多酚、农药残留和生物活性,并将传统与有机进行比较的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of phenolic content, pesticide residue and biological activities of organic lemon and cucumber in Lebanese market
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the safety and quality of organic food product versus conventional ones in the Lebanese market. Design/methodology/approach Selected organic and conventional Lemon and cucumber were assessed for the presence of pesticides residues using LC-MS/MS and GC/MS/MS, also compared at the level of total polyphenols content, flavonoids, tannins and tested for their antiradical and antibacterial activities. Findings The findings indicate that organic lemons were contaminated by four types of pesticide residues (33.33%), while one pesticide residue (22.22%) was detected in conventional one, which were all below the European Union Maximum Residue Limits. For cucumber, six pesticide residues (66.66%) were detected in organic samples, while in conventional, eight pesticide residues (55.55%) were detected. However, absolutely four samples (44.44%) in each of conventional and organic cucumber samples surpass the maximum residue levels. Both lemon and cucumber, regardless of the farming systems, possess potent antioxidant activity with no significant difference, except for lemon, where total polyphenol was highly significant in conventional. Additionally, this study showed that lemon of conventional origin was slightly more effective in inhibiting the growth of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains compared to organic samples, while both cucumber types did not exert any antibacterial effect. Originality/value This is the first paper to assess the polyphenols, pesticide residue and biological activities of organic lemon and cucumber in Lebanese market as well as comparing conventional to organic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Food Science
Nutrition & Food Science FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Food Science* (NFS) is an international, double blind peer-reviewed journal offering accessible and comprehensive coverage of food, beverage and nutrition research. The journal draws out the practical and social applications of research, demonstrates best practice through applied research and case studies and showcases innovative or controversial practices and points of view. The journal is an invaluable resource to inform individuals, organisations and the public on modern thinking, research and attitudes to food science and nutrition. NFS welcomes empirical and applied research, viewpoint papers, conceptual and technical papers, case studies, meta-analysis studies, literature reviews and general reviews which take a scientific approach to the following topics: -Attitudes to food and nutrition -Healthy eating/ nutritional public health initiatives, policies and legislation -Clinical and community nutrition and health (including public health and multiple or complex co-morbidities) -Nutrition in different cultural and ethnic groups -Nutrition during pregnancy, lactation, childhood, and young adult years -Nutrition for adults and older people -Nutrition in the workplace -Nutrition in lower and middle income countries (incl. comparisons with higher income countries) -Food science and technology, including food processing and microbiological quality -Genetically engineered foods -Food safety / quality, including chemical, physical and microbiological analysis of how these aspects effect health or nutritional quality of foodstuffs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信