人机交互的信任量表:人机信任量表的翻译、改编和验证

IF 3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ana Pinto, Sónia Sousa, Ana Simões, Joana Santos
{"title":"人机交互的信任量表:人机信任量表的翻译、改编和验证","authors":"Ana Pinto,&nbsp;Sónia Sousa,&nbsp;Ana Simões,&nbsp;Joana Santos","doi":"10.1155/2022/6437441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Recently there has been an increasing demand for technologies (automated and intelligent machines) that brings benefits to organizations and society. Similar to the widespread use of personal computers in the past, today’s needs are towards facilitating human-machine technology appropriation, especially in highly risky and regulated industries like robotics, manufacturing, automation, military, finance, or healthcare. In this context, trust can be used as a critical element to instruct how human-machine interaction should occur. Considering the context-dependency and multidimensional trust, this study seeks to find a way to measure the effects of perceived trust in a collaborative robot (cobot), regardless of its literal credibility as a real person. This article aims at translating, adapting, and validating a Human-Computer Trust Scale (HCTM) in human-robot interaction (HRI) context and its application to cobots. The Human-Robot Interaction Trust Scale (HRITS) involved 239 participants and included eleven items. The 2nd order CFA with a general factor called “trust” have proven to be empirically robust (CFI = .94; TLI = .93; SRMR = .04; and RMSEA = .05) [CR = .84; AVE = .58, and MaxR(H) = .92]; results indicated a good measurement of the general factor trust, and the model satisfied the criteria for measure trust. An analysis of the differences in perceptions of trust by gender was conducted using a <i>t</i>-test. This analysis showed that statistical differences by gender exist (<i>p</i> = .04). This study’s results allowed for a better understanding of trust in HRI, specifically regarding cobots. The validation of a Portuguese scale for trust assessment in HRI can give a valuable contribution to designing collaborative environments between humans and robots.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2022/6437441","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Trust Scale for Human-Robot Interaction: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Human Computer Trust Scale\",\"authors\":\"Ana Pinto,&nbsp;Sónia Sousa,&nbsp;Ana Simões,&nbsp;Joana Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/6437441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Recently there has been an increasing demand for technologies (automated and intelligent machines) that brings benefits to organizations and society. Similar to the widespread use of personal computers in the past, today’s needs are towards facilitating human-machine technology appropriation, especially in highly risky and regulated industries like robotics, manufacturing, automation, military, finance, or healthcare. In this context, trust can be used as a critical element to instruct how human-machine interaction should occur. Considering the context-dependency and multidimensional trust, this study seeks to find a way to measure the effects of perceived trust in a collaborative robot (cobot), regardless of its literal credibility as a real person. This article aims at translating, adapting, and validating a Human-Computer Trust Scale (HCTM) in human-robot interaction (HRI) context and its application to cobots. The Human-Robot Interaction Trust Scale (HRITS) involved 239 participants and included eleven items. The 2nd order CFA with a general factor called “trust” have proven to be empirically robust (CFI = .94; TLI = .93; SRMR = .04; and RMSEA = .05) [CR = .84; AVE = .58, and MaxR(H) = .92]; results indicated a good measurement of the general factor trust, and the model satisfied the criteria for measure trust. An analysis of the differences in perceptions of trust by gender was conducted using a <i>t</i>-test. This analysis showed that statistical differences by gender exist (<i>p</i> = .04). This study’s results allowed for a better understanding of trust in HRI, specifically regarding cobots. The validation of a Portuguese scale for trust assessment in HRI can give a valuable contribution to designing collaborative environments between humans and robots.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":\"2022 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2022/6437441\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/6437441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/6437441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,对为组织和社会带来利益的技术(自动化和智能机器)的需求越来越大。与过去个人电脑的广泛使用类似,今天的需求是促进人机技术的使用,特别是在机器人、制造、自动化、军事、金融或医疗保健等高风险和受监管的行业。在这种情况下,信任可以作为指导人机交互应该如何发生的关键因素。考虑到上下文依赖和多维信任,本研究试图找到一种方法来衡量协作机器人(cobot)中感知信任的影响,无论其作为真人的字面可信度如何。本文旨在翻译、改编和验证人机交互(HRI)环境中的人机信任量表(HCTM)及其在cobot中的应用。人机交互信任量表(HRITS)涉及239名参与者,包括11个项目。具有称为“信任”的一般因子的二阶CFA已被证明在经验上是稳健的(CFI=.94;TLI=.93;SRMR=.04;和RMSEA=.05)[CR=.84;AVE=.58,和MaxR H=.92];结果表明,该模型能够很好地度量一般因素的信任度,满足度量信任度的标准。采用t检验对不同性别的信任认知差异进行了分析。该分析表明,存在按性别划分的统计差异(p=0.04)。这项研究的结果有助于更好地理解对HRI的信任,特别是对cobot的信任。葡萄牙HRI信任评估量表的验证可以为设计人类和机器人之间的协作环境做出宝贵贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Trust Scale for Human-Robot Interaction: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Human Computer Trust Scale

A Trust Scale for Human-Robot Interaction: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Human Computer Trust Scale

Recently there has been an increasing demand for technologies (automated and intelligent machines) that brings benefits to organizations and society. Similar to the widespread use of personal computers in the past, today’s needs are towards facilitating human-machine technology appropriation, especially in highly risky and regulated industries like robotics, manufacturing, automation, military, finance, or healthcare. In this context, trust can be used as a critical element to instruct how human-machine interaction should occur. Considering the context-dependency and multidimensional trust, this study seeks to find a way to measure the effects of perceived trust in a collaborative robot (cobot), regardless of its literal credibility as a real person. This article aims at translating, adapting, and validating a Human-Computer Trust Scale (HCTM) in human-robot interaction (HRI) context and its application to cobots. The Human-Robot Interaction Trust Scale (HRITS) involved 239 participants and included eleven items. The 2nd order CFA with a general factor called “trust” have proven to be empirically robust (CFI = .94; TLI = .93; SRMR = .04; and RMSEA = .05) [CR = .84; AVE = .58, and MaxR(H) = .92]; results indicated a good measurement of the general factor trust, and the model satisfied the criteria for measure trust. An analysis of the differences in perceptions of trust by gender was conducted using a t-test. This analysis showed that statistical differences by gender exist (p = .04). This study’s results allowed for a better understanding of trust in HRI, specifically regarding cobots. The validation of a Portuguese scale for trust assessment in HRI can give a valuable contribution to designing collaborative environments between humans and robots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信