欧盟雇主组织的社会政策偏好:探索性分析

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Igor Guardiancich, Andrea Terlizzi, D. Natali
{"title":"欧盟雇主组织的社会政策偏好:探索性分析","authors":"Igor Guardiancich, Andrea Terlizzi, D. Natali","doi":"10.1177/09596801231153928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite decades of European social dialogue, little is known about the social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations (EEOs). Building on the literature on industrial relations and the role of business in welfare state development, this article explores the preferences of key EEOs (BusinessEurope, SGI Europe and SMEunited) in vocational education and training (VET), active and passive labour market policies, pensions and work–family reconciliation. Software-based qualitative content analysis of 75 position papers and 19 joint declarations, triangulated with four elite semi-structured interviews, is employed to assess employers’ preferences along four national and two European dimensions. Largely in line with the power resources theory, EEOs favour cost containment and social investment, by strengthening labour market flexicurity and reducing skills mismatches through VET. Conflicting logics of membership and influence guide the actions of EEOs: members are wary of legislation impinging on national social policy traditions; yet, greater European assertiveness makes lobbying efforts unavoidable.","PeriodicalId":47034,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"29 1","pages":"243 - 269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations: An exploratory analysis\",\"authors\":\"Igor Guardiancich, Andrea Terlizzi, D. Natali\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09596801231153928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite decades of European social dialogue, little is known about the social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations (EEOs). Building on the literature on industrial relations and the role of business in welfare state development, this article explores the preferences of key EEOs (BusinessEurope, SGI Europe and SMEunited) in vocational education and training (VET), active and passive labour market policies, pensions and work–family reconciliation. Software-based qualitative content analysis of 75 position papers and 19 joint declarations, triangulated with four elite semi-structured interviews, is employed to assess employers’ preferences along four national and two European dimensions. Largely in line with the power resources theory, EEOs favour cost containment and social investment, by strengthening labour market flexicurity and reducing skills mismatches through VET. Conflicting logics of membership and influence guide the actions of EEOs: members are wary of legislation impinging on national social policy traditions; yet, greater European assertiveness makes lobbying efforts unavoidable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Industrial Relations\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"243 - 269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Industrial Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801231153928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801231153928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管欧洲进行了几十年的社会对话,但人们对欧盟雇主组织的社会政策偏好知之甚少。在有关劳资关系和企业在福利国家发展中的作用的文献的基础上,本文探讨了主要EEO(BusinessEurope、SGI Europe和SMEunited)在职业教育和培训(VET)、主动和被动劳动力市场政策、养老金和工作-家庭和解方面的偏好。对75份职位文件和19份联合声明进行了基于软件的定性内容分析,并通过四次精英半结构化访谈进行了三角分析,以评估雇主在四个国家和两个欧洲层面的偏好。在很大程度上符合权力资源理论,EEO通过VET加强劳动力市场的灵活性和减少技能错配,支持成本控制和社会投资。成员资格和影响力的冲突逻辑指导着EEO的行动:成员们对侵犯国家社会政策传统的立法持谨慎态度;然而,欧洲更大的自信使得游说活动不可避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations: An exploratory analysis
Despite decades of European social dialogue, little is known about the social policy preferences of EU employers’ organizations (EEOs). Building on the literature on industrial relations and the role of business in welfare state development, this article explores the preferences of key EEOs (BusinessEurope, SGI Europe and SMEunited) in vocational education and training (VET), active and passive labour market policies, pensions and work–family reconciliation. Software-based qualitative content analysis of 75 position papers and 19 joint declarations, triangulated with four elite semi-structured interviews, is employed to assess employers’ preferences along four national and two European dimensions. Largely in line with the power resources theory, EEOs favour cost containment and social investment, by strengthening labour market flexicurity and reducing skills mismatches through VET. Conflicting logics of membership and influence guide the actions of EEOs: members are wary of legislation impinging on national social policy traditions; yet, greater European assertiveness makes lobbying efforts unavoidable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Industrial Relations
European Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: It embraces a broad definition of industrial relations and includes articles which relate to any aspect of work and employment. It publishes rigorous and innovative work on and from all European countries, from the Atlantic to the Urals. All social science disciplines are relevant to its remit, and interdisciplinary approaches are particulary encouraged. A major objective is to foster cross-national comparative analysis; and in this context, work which relates European developments to broader global experience is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信