分权治理与集体行动困境:中国地方政府应对COVID - 19

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
G. Xin, Jia Chen
{"title":"分权治理与集体行动困境:中国地方政府应对COVID - 19","authors":"G. Xin, Jia Chen","doi":"10.1002/pad.2004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the Chinese government's responses to COVID-19 since its outbreak have been widely discussed, scant attention has been paid to the cross-regional variation in China in handling the pandemic in the early stage. This article adopts and synthesizes the theory of regionally decentralized governance and the institutional collective action dilemma framework to offer a novel analytical characterization of the pattern of sub-national governments' counter-COVID-19 initiatives in different policy areas and highlights the peer effect and regional competition dynamics. We provide three brief case studies to illustrate various institutional collective action dilemmas under this framework that emerged in pandemic responses and must be addressed through re-centralization. Despite its focus on China's regional responses to COVID-19, this paper prompts the construction of a broad analytical framework for precipitating a better understanding of the complex structure of China's political and governance system in a time of crisis.","PeriodicalId":39679,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralized governance and collective action dilemma: Sub‐national governments' responses to COVID‐19 in China\",\"authors\":\"G. Xin, Jia Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pad.2004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the Chinese government's responses to COVID-19 since its outbreak have been widely discussed, scant attention has been paid to the cross-regional variation in China in handling the pandemic in the early stage. This article adopts and synthesizes the theory of regionally decentralized governance and the institutional collective action dilemma framework to offer a novel analytical characterization of the pattern of sub-national governments' counter-COVID-19 initiatives in different policy areas and highlights the peer effect and regional competition dynamics. We provide three brief case studies to illustrate various institutional collective action dilemmas under this framework that emerged in pandemic responses and must be addressed through re-centralization. Despite its focus on China's regional responses to COVID-19, this paper prompts the construction of a broad analytical framework for precipitating a better understanding of the complex structure of China's political and governance system in a time of crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情爆发以来,中国政府的应对措施引起了广泛讨论,但人们很少关注中国在疫情早期处理方面的跨地区差异。本文采用并综合了区域分权治理理论和制度性集体行动困境框架,对地方政府在不同政策领域的抗疫举措模式进行了全新的分析表征,并突出了同行效应和区域竞争动态。我们提供了三个简短的案例研究,以说明在这一框架下,在大流行应对中出现的各种机构集体行动困境,必须通过重新集中来解决。尽管本文关注的是中国应对新冠肺炎疫情的区域措施,但本文仍建议构建一个广泛的分析框架,以便更好地理解危机时期中国政治和治理体系的复杂结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decentralized governance and collective action dilemma: Sub‐national governments' responses to COVID‐19 in China
While the Chinese government's responses to COVID-19 since its outbreak have been widely discussed, scant attention has been paid to the cross-regional variation in China in handling the pandemic in the early stage. This article adopts and synthesizes the theory of regionally decentralized governance and the institutional collective action dilemma framework to offer a novel analytical characterization of the pattern of sub-national governments' counter-COVID-19 initiatives in different policy areas and highlights the peer effect and regional competition dynamics. We provide three brief case studies to illustrate various institutional collective action dilemmas under this framework that emerged in pandemic responses and must be addressed through re-centralization. Despite its focus on China's regional responses to COVID-19, this paper prompts the construction of a broad analytical framework for precipitating a better understanding of the complex structure of China's political and governance system in a time of crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Administration and Development
Public Administration and Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1949, Public Administration and Development (PAD) has been reviewing and assessing the practice of public administration at the local, regional, national and international levels where it is directed to managing development processes in low and medium income countries. It gives special attention to investigations of the management of all phases of public policy formulation and implementation which have an interest and importance beyond a particular government and state. PAD has a particular interest in the link between public administration practice and management research and provides a professional and academic forum for reporting on new experiences and experiments. PAD also publishes articles on development management research in the NGO sector. It is widely read by academics and practitioners alike, including consultants, donors and policy advisers. With its case study approach, it is also frequently used for teaching and training purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信