人跌落跳跃的双力板与单力板分析

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
S. Jørgensen, J. Bojsen-Møller, Thue Skalgard, H. B. Olsen, P. Aagaard
{"title":"人跌落跳跃的双力板与单力板分析","authors":"S. Jørgensen, J. Bojsen-Møller, Thue Skalgard, H. B. Olsen, P. Aagaard","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim was to develop a Drop Jump (DJ) protocol on dual force plate recordings (Dual Force Plate method: DFPM) to assess lower limb power production and quantify impact loading, and range of body center of mass (BCM) excursion during human DJ, and to examine if single‐plate analysis (Reverse Integration Method: RIM) was a valid alternative. Nineteen male subjects performed DJs from an elevated platform (48 cm). Kinematic (BCM displacement and velocity, rebound jump height) and kinetic (BCM power, work, rate of force development (RFD), lower limb stiffness (LLS)) variables were obtained by force plate recording during the drop take‐off phase (DFPM) and rebound phase (RIM, DFPM). DFPM and RIM did not differ at the group level for any outcome parameter. However, large intra‐individual differences in BCM displacement were observed between DFPM and RIM (CV 9‐10%) as well as for rebound jump height, LLS, and work performed on BCM (CV 9.8‐14%). A majority of the remaining variables demonstrated low intra‐individual variability between the two methods (r= 0.73‐0.96, CV 1‐5%). In conclusion, No systematic differences were revealed between DFPM and RIM, suggesting that RIM is a valid approach for assessing DJ performance. Substantial between‐method intra‐individual variability was noted for key outcome parameters.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.255","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual vs single force plate analysis of human drop jumping\",\"authors\":\"S. Jørgensen, J. Bojsen-Møller, Thue Skalgard, H. B. Olsen, P. Aagaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tsm2.255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim was to develop a Drop Jump (DJ) protocol on dual force plate recordings (Dual Force Plate method: DFPM) to assess lower limb power production and quantify impact loading, and range of body center of mass (BCM) excursion during human DJ, and to examine if single‐plate analysis (Reverse Integration Method: RIM) was a valid alternative. Nineteen male subjects performed DJs from an elevated platform (48 cm). Kinematic (BCM displacement and velocity, rebound jump height) and kinetic (BCM power, work, rate of force development (RFD), lower limb stiffness (LLS)) variables were obtained by force plate recording during the drop take‐off phase (DFPM) and rebound phase (RIM, DFPM). DFPM and RIM did not differ at the group level for any outcome parameter. However, large intra‐individual differences in BCM displacement were observed between DFPM and RIM (CV 9‐10%) as well as for rebound jump height, LLS, and work performed on BCM (CV 9.8‐14%). A majority of the remaining variables demonstrated low intra‐individual variability between the two methods (r= 0.73‐0.96, CV 1‐5%). In conclusion, No systematic differences were revealed between DFPM and RIM, suggesting that RIM is a valid approach for assessing DJ performance. Substantial between‐method intra‐individual variability was noted for key outcome parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational sports medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.255\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的是在双力板记录(双力板法:DFPM)上开发一种Drop - Jump (DJ)协议,以评估人类DJ期间下肢力量产生和量化冲击负荷,以及身体重心(BCM)偏移范围,并检查单板分析(反向积分法:RIM)是否是一种有效的替代方案。19名男性受试者在一个升高的平台(48厘米)上表演dj。在起落阶段(DFPM)和反弹阶段(RIM, DFPM),通过力板记录获得了运动学(BCM位移和速度,回跳高度)和动力学(BCM功率,功,力发展率(RFD),下肢刚度(LLS))变量。DFPM和RIM在组水平上没有任何结果参数的差异。然而,在DFPM和RIM之间观察到BCM位移的巨大个体内差异(CV 9‐10%),以及反弹跳跃高度、LLS和BCM工作(CV 9.8‐14%)。其余大多数变量在两种方法之间表现出较低的个体内变异性(r= 0.73 - 0.96, CV为1 - 5%)。综上所述,DFPM和RIM之间没有系统性差异,表明RIM是评估DJ表现的有效方法。关键结果参数存在显著的方法间个体差异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual vs single force plate analysis of human drop jumping
The aim was to develop a Drop Jump (DJ) protocol on dual force plate recordings (Dual Force Plate method: DFPM) to assess lower limb power production and quantify impact loading, and range of body center of mass (BCM) excursion during human DJ, and to examine if single‐plate analysis (Reverse Integration Method: RIM) was a valid alternative. Nineteen male subjects performed DJs from an elevated platform (48 cm). Kinematic (BCM displacement and velocity, rebound jump height) and kinetic (BCM power, work, rate of force development (RFD), lower limb stiffness (LLS)) variables were obtained by force plate recording during the drop take‐off phase (DFPM) and rebound phase (RIM, DFPM). DFPM and RIM did not differ at the group level for any outcome parameter. However, large intra‐individual differences in BCM displacement were observed between DFPM and RIM (CV 9‐10%) as well as for rebound jump height, LLS, and work performed on BCM (CV 9.8‐14%). A majority of the remaining variables demonstrated low intra‐individual variability between the two methods (r= 0.73‐0.96, CV 1‐5%). In conclusion, No systematic differences were revealed between DFPM and RIM, suggesting that RIM is a valid approach for assessing DJ performance. Substantial between‐method intra‐individual variability was noted for key outcome parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信