情绪障碍量表的因子结构——情绪障碍学生3级评定量表

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
M. Lambert, D. Cullinan, M. Epstein, Jodie Martin
{"title":"情绪障碍量表的因子结构——情绪障碍学生3级评定量表","authors":"M. Lambert, D. Cullinan, M. Epstein, Jodie Martin","doi":"10.1177/01987429211012328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the internal structure of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance-3 Rating Scale (RS), a teacher-completed RS developed to measure emotional disturbance (ED). As defined in U.S. law and regulations, ED involves five characteristics or patterns of behavioral and emotional maladaptation. RS data obtained on a sample of students with ED were used to examine validity evidence based on the internal structure of the assessment. Of particular interest was the extent to which multivariate factors derived from the RS data conform to the five characteristics of ED stated in the definition. Results indicate that the RS data fit a 5-factor model reasonably well. A subsequent bifactor analysis identified a considerable proportion of common variance across factors, suggesting the presence of a strong general ED factor, two distinct group factors (Inability to Learn and Inappropriate Behavior), and three weak group factors. The findings provided evidence of the validity of the SAED-3 RS based on internal structure and pointed to support for use of the RS in contributing to the process of determining whether a student qualifies for the ED education disability. Implications for improved research on the nature of ED and how students with ED can be better served are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"47 1","pages":"187 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01987429211012328","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factor Structure of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance – 3 Rating Scale for Students Identified With Emotional Disturbance\",\"authors\":\"M. Lambert, D. Cullinan, M. Epstein, Jodie Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01987429211012328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the internal structure of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance-3 Rating Scale (RS), a teacher-completed RS developed to measure emotional disturbance (ED). As defined in U.S. law and regulations, ED involves five characteristics or patterns of behavioral and emotional maladaptation. RS data obtained on a sample of students with ED were used to examine validity evidence based on the internal structure of the assessment. Of particular interest was the extent to which multivariate factors derived from the RS data conform to the five characteristics of ED stated in the definition. Results indicate that the RS data fit a 5-factor model reasonably well. A subsequent bifactor analysis identified a considerable proportion of common variance across factors, suggesting the presence of a strong general ED factor, two distinct group factors (Inability to Learn and Inappropriate Behavior), and three weak group factors. The findings provided evidence of the validity of the SAED-3 RS based on internal structure and pointed to support for use of the RS in contributing to the process of determining whether a student qualifies for the ED education disability. Implications for improved research on the nature of ED and how students with ED can be better served are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Disorders\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01987429211012328\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211012328\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211012328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究考察了《情绪障碍评定量表-3评定量表》(RS)的内部结构,RS是一套由教师自行编制的情绪障碍评定量表。根据美国法律法规的定义,ED包括五种行为和情绪适应不良的特征或模式。从ED学生样本中获得的RS数据被用于基于评估的内部结构来检验效度证据。特别令人感兴趣的是,从RS数据中得出的多变量因素在多大程度上符合定义中所述的ED的五个特征。结果表明,RS数据较好地拟合了5因子模型。随后的双因素分析确定了各因素之间相当大比例的共同方差,表明存在一个强的一般ED因素,两个不同的群体因素(学习能力低下和行为不当),以及三个弱群体因素。研究结果提供了基于内部结构的SAED-3 RS有效性的证据,并指出支持使用RS来帮助确定学生是否符合ED教育障碍的资格。本文讨论了如何改进对教育教育性质的研究,以及如何更好地为教育教育学生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factor Structure of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance – 3 Rating Scale for Students Identified With Emotional Disturbance
This study examined the internal structure of the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance-3 Rating Scale (RS), a teacher-completed RS developed to measure emotional disturbance (ED). As defined in U.S. law and regulations, ED involves five characteristics or patterns of behavioral and emotional maladaptation. RS data obtained on a sample of students with ED were used to examine validity evidence based on the internal structure of the assessment. Of particular interest was the extent to which multivariate factors derived from the RS data conform to the five characteristics of ED stated in the definition. Results indicate that the RS data fit a 5-factor model reasonably well. A subsequent bifactor analysis identified a considerable proportion of common variance across factors, suggesting the presence of a strong general ED factor, two distinct group factors (Inability to Learn and Inappropriate Behavior), and three weak group factors. The findings provided evidence of the validity of the SAED-3 RS based on internal structure and pointed to support for use of the RS in contributing to the process of determining whether a student qualifies for the ED education disability. Implications for improved research on the nature of ED and how students with ED can be better served are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信