走向日常美学的考古学

IF 1.6 2区历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2017-09-06 DOI:10.1017/S0959774317000622

R. Skeates

{"title":"走向日常美学的考古学","authors":"R. Skeates","doi":"10.1017/S0959774317000622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of aesthetics has long been marginalized in archaeology. It was originally formulated in the eighteenth century as part of an appreciation of Greek art and was fundamentally concerned with appreciating a quasi-universal idea of beauty; and as archaeologists and anthropologists recognized the distortion created by applying it to material from non-Western and pre-modern art, it fell into disfavour. An alternative anthropological approach pioneered by Howard Morphy regards aesthetics as the study of the affects of the physical properties of objects on the senses and the qualitative evaluation of those properties; this converges with the emerging philosophical study of ‘everyday aesthetics’. This article explores how archaeologists could apply these concepts, particularly through a study of Maltese Neolithic everyday aesthetics.","PeriodicalId":47164,"journal":{"name":"CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL","volume":"27 1","pages":"607-616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0959774317000622","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an Archaeology of Everyday Aesthetics\",\"authors\":\"R. Skeates\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0959774317000622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of aesthetics has long been marginalized in archaeology. It was originally formulated in the eighteenth century as part of an appreciation of Greek art and was fundamentally concerned with appreciating a quasi-universal idea of beauty; and as archaeologists and anthropologists recognized the distortion created by applying it to material from non-Western and pre-modern art, it fell into disfavour. An alternative anthropological approach pioneered by Howard Morphy regards aesthetics as the study of the affects of the physical properties of objects on the senses and the qualitative evaluation of those properties; this converges with the emerging philosophical study of ‘everyday aesthetics’. This article explores how archaeologists could apply these concepts, particularly through a study of Maltese Neolithic everyday aesthetics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"607-616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0959774317000622\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774317000622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774317000622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

摘要

美学概念在考古学中长期处于边缘地位。它最初是在18世纪形成的，作为希腊艺术欣赏的一部分，从根本上讲，它与欣赏一种准普遍的美的观念有关;当考古学家和人类学家认识到将其应用于非西方和前现代艺术的材料所造成的扭曲时，它就不受欢迎了。由霍华德·莫菲开创的另一种人类学方法认为美学是研究物体的物理性质对感官的影响以及对这些性质的定性评价;这与新兴的“日常美学”哲学研究相结合。本文探讨了考古学家如何应用这些概念，特别是通过对马耳他新石器时代日常美学的研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Towards an Archaeology of Everyday Aesthetics

The concept of aesthetics has long been marginalized in archaeology. It was originally formulated in the eighteenth century as part of an appreciation of Greek art and was fundamentally concerned with appreciating a quasi-universal idea of beauty; and as archaeologists and anthropologists recognized the distortion created by applying it to material from non-Western and pre-modern art, it fell into disfavour. An alternative anthropological approach pioneered by Howard Morphy regards aesthetics as the study of the affects of the physical properties of objects on the senses and the qualitative evaluation of those properties; this converges with the emerging philosophical study of ‘everyday aesthetics’. This article explores how archaeologists could apply these concepts, particularly through a study of Maltese Neolithic everyday aesthetics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Cambridge Archaeological Journal is the leading journal for cognitive and symbolic archaeology. It provides a forum for innovative, descriptive and theoretical archaeological research, paying particular attention to the role and development of human intellectual abilities and symbolic beliefs and practices. Specific topics covered in recent issues include: the use of cultural neurophenomenology for the understanding of Maya religious belief, agency and the individual, new approaches to rock art and shamanism, the significance of prehistoric monuments, ritual behaviour on Pacific Islands, and body metamorphosis in prehistoric boulder artworks. In addition to major articles and shorter notes, the Cambridge Archaeological Journal includes review features on significant recent books.