评论“不同的人有不同的笔法?”将公共价值转化为官方意义

IF 2.7 4区管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

International Review of Administrative Sciences Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1177/00208523231158079

Edmund C. Stazyk

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的评论是“不同的人有不同的笔法?”“将公共价值观转化为官方意义”考虑了作者论点的优点，并为对公共价值观感兴趣的研究人员提供了一些建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A commentary on “Different strokes for different folks? The translation of public values into official meanings”

This commentary on the article “Different strokes for different folks? The translation of public values into official meanings” considers the merits of the authors’ arguments and offers several recommendations for researchers interested in public values.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Review of Administrative Sciences PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： IRAS is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to academic and professional public administration. Founded in 1927 it is the oldest scholarly public administration journal specifically focused on comparative and international topics. IRAS seeks to shape the future agenda of public administration around the world by encouraging reflection on international comparisons, new techniques and approaches, the dialogue between academics and practitioners, and debates about the future of the field itself.